journal article·2025-03Open access

A multi-analysis framework for uncertainty quantification and data-driven simulation of design allowables in laminated composites

Johannes Reiner

Abstract

This study combines various computational methods informed by statistical data from experimental Compact Tension (CT) testing to simulate progressive damage evolution in composites, including their uncertainty. First, efficient Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is employed to generate large datasets. Second, a global sensitivity analysis identifies influential FEA input parameters. Third, a simplified surrogate model based on polynomial regression is developed. This rapid model enables the coupling with Bayesian parameter estimation in form of Markov Chain Monte Carlo to determine the probability distribution of the FEA input parameters, thereby representing the measured uncertainty in CT tests. The capability of this multi-analysis framework is demonstrated through the simulation of A- and B-Basis design allowables in various open-hole tension tests. The results indicate that B-Basis values are consistent between experiments and simulations, with differences ranging from 2% and 9%. Conversely, the calculations of A-Basis allowables vary significantly due to the enhanced data requirements for their correct calculation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Process models: A cornerstone to composites 4.010.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111621 ↗
2. B. Van Bavel, Y. Zhao, D. Vandepitte, D. Moens, M.G.R. Faes, Bridging the composite meso-macro gap: a numerically efficient spatial uncertainty quantification approach, in: International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, KU Leuven, Belgium, 2022.
3. Estimation of composite laminate design allowables using the statistical characteristics of lamina level test data10.5139/IJASS.2015.16.3.360 ↗
4. Nettles · 2004
5. Design allowables of composite laminates: A review10.1177/00219983221117216 ↗
6. A deep transfer learning approach to construct the allowable load space of notched composite laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110432 ↗
7. Virtual calculation of the B-value allowables of notched composite laminates10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.12.049 ↗
8. A methodology to obtain material design allowables from high-fidelity compression after impact simulations on composite laminates10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106069 ↗
9. A methodology to generate design allowables of composite laminates using machine learning10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2021.111095 ↗
10. Machine learning based algorithms for uncertainty quantification in numerical weather prediction models10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101295 ↗
11. Bayesian forecasting in economics and finance: A modern review10.1016/j.ijforecast.2023.05.002 ↗
12. Bayesian parameter estimation for dynamical models in systems biology10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010651 ↗
13. Bayesian parameter estimation for the inclusion of uncertainty in progressive damage simulation of composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117257 ↗
14. Navigating the unknown: Tackling high-dimensional challenges in composite damage modeling with bootstrapping and Bayesian uncertainty quantification10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110462 ↗
15. Martin · 2016
16. Machine learning assisted intelligent design of meta structures: a review10.20517/microstructures.2023.29 ↗
17. Theory-Guided Machine Learning for Damage Characterization of Composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112407 ↗
18. Machine learning assisted characterisation and simulation of compressive damage in composite laminates10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114290 ↗
19. J. Reiner, Finite Element Analysis Combined With Machine Learning to Simulate Open-Hole Strength and Impact Tests of Fibre-Reinforced Composites, Int. J. Comput. Methods 2241005, http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219876222410055.10.1142/S0219876222410055 ↗
20. Augmentation of scarce data—A new approach for deep-learning modeling of composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110491 ↗
21. A review of machine learning for progressive damage modelling of fiber-reinforced composites10.1007/s10443-024-10255-8 ↗
22. But how can I optimise my high-dimensional problem with only very little data? – A composite manufacturing application10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.112941 ↗
23. Global sensitivity analysis for degraded braided composite with interval process10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110542 ↗
24. Higher-order sensitivity analyses to understand the role of FE input parameters on the simulation of composites in progressive fracture tests10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118585 ↗
25. Intralaminar crack propagation of glass fiber reinforced composite laminate10.1016/j.istruc.2022.05.064 ↗
26. Crack propagation for glass fiber reinforced laminates containing flame retardant: Based on single-edge tensile loading10.37358/MP.22.2.5588 ↗
27. Intralaminar fracture toughness characterisation of woven composite laminates. Part I: Design and analysis of a compact tension (CT) specimen10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.08.012 ↗
28. Intralaminar fracture toughness characterisation of woven composite laminates. Part II: Experimental characterisation10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.08.011 ↗
29. Standard test method for open-hole tensile strength of polymer matrix composite laminates
30. Marlett · 2011
31. A physically based continuum damage mechanics model for thin laminated composite structures10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00016-7 ↗
32. A structural modelling framework for prediction of damage development and failure of composite laminates10.1177/0021998312474044 ↗
33. An orthotropic non-local approach to modeling intra-laminar damage progression in laminated composites10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.07.015 ↗
34. 2016
35. Mechanical properties and details of composite laminates for the test cases used in the third world-wide failure exercise10.1177/0021998313499477 ↗
36. A practical approach for the non-local simulation of progressive damage in quasi-isotropic fibre-reinforced composite laminates10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113761 ↗
37. Virtual characterization of nonlocal continuum damage model parameters using a high fidelity finite element model10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113073 ↗
38. Efficient finite element simulation of compression after impact behaviour in quasi-isotropic composite laminates10.1016/j.coco.2021.100967 ↗
39. SALib: An open-source Python library for sensitivity analysis10.21105/joss.00097 ↗
40. Toward SALib 2.0: Advancing the accessibility and interpretability of global sensitivity analyses
41. Bayesian and Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for identifying nonlinear systems in the presence of uncertainty10.1098/rsta.2014.0405 ↗
42. Objective and automated calibration of progressive damage models for finite element simulation of fiber reinforced composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116618 ↗
43. emcee: The MCMC hammer10.1086/670067 ↗
44. Ensemble samplers with affine invariance10.2140/camcos.2010.5.65 ↗
45. Wichita State University · 2012
46. Reduced allowable strength of composite laminate for unknown distribution due to limited tests10.1177/0021998320903781 ↗
47. Numerical study of the damage behavior of carbon fiber/glass fiber hybrid composite laminates under low-velocity impact10.1007/s12221-020-0026-2 ↗
48. Die theorie der elastizitat und die bedurfnisse der festigkeitslehre
49. Virtual data-driven optimisation for zero defect composites manufacture10.1016/j.matdes.2024.112934 ↗
50. Data-driven parameter identification to simulate progressive damage in fiber reinforced laminates under low velocity impact10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104711 ↗