journal article·2016-03Open access

Tensile and shear strength of bimaterial interfaces within composite materials

Alberto Barroso, Bernd Lauke, Vladislav Mantič, Federico París

Abstract

The determination of the tensile and shear strengths of homogeneous materials can be easily performed by standard tensile and shear (e.g. Iosipescu) tests. Nevertheless, when the determination of these strengths involves a bimaterial interface, the standard samples present bimaterial corner configurations at their free-edges which generate singular stress fields. In the presence of these singular stress fields, the tensile and shear stress distributions are strongly non-uniform at these edges, where failure initiates and propagates along the bimaterial interface. The apparent strength obtained from these tests is not representative of the regularized strength of the bimaterial interface. To eliminate the stress singularities, a small notch is made on one of the materials along the interface perimeter, in this study. This idea, originally proposed by Lauke and Barroso (Compos. Interface, 18:661-669, 2011) for ascertaining tensile strength, is now adapted to ascertain shear strength, using a modified geometry of the Iosipescu sample, and it has also been generalized to configurations involving composite materials. Both proposals, for the tensile and shear tests, are performed using the bimaterial configuration of a composite and an adhesive; a bimaterial interface which typically appears in adhesive joints with composites. The local notch geometry is defined using semi-analytical tools developed by the authors and numerically verified by Finite Element models. The modified bimaterial geometries, tested under tension, demonstrated a higher tensile strength. However, the modified bimaterial geometries tested in shear did not show any clear influence over the failure load with or without the notch in the particular bimaterial configuration tested in this study. © 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Notched-butt test for the determination of adhesion strength at bimaterial interfaces10.1163/156855412X626243 ↗
2. Representativity of the singular stress state in the failure of adhesively bonded joints between metals and composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.029 ↗
3. Doubly-curved interfaces for adhesion strength testing10.1163/092764411X567468 ↗
4. Determination of interface strength between two polymer materials by a new curved interface tensile test10.1163/156855403763586765 ↗
5. Determination of the interface strength between two polymer materials by a new curved interface tensile test: preliminary experimental results10.1163/156855403322667287 ↗
6. Stress concentration along curved interfaces as basis for adhesion tests10.1163/156855407780452887 ↗
7. Improvement of adhesive strength at a bi-material interface by adjusting the interface angles at the free edge10.1016/j.tafmec.2015.02.002 ↗
8. An innovative method to determine bonding strength envelope based on theory of bi-material interface mechanics10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.022 ↗
9. Stress concentration analyses of bi-material bonded joints without in-plane stress singularities10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2008.01.004 ↗
10. Singularity analysis of anisotropic multimaterial corners10.1023/A:1023937819943 ↗
11. Singular elastic solutions in anisotropic multimaterial corners
12. Reduction of contact stress by use of relief notches10.1007/BF02326071 ↗
13. Convex interfacial joints with least stress singularities in dissimilar materials10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.10.002 ↗
14. Shaw · 2006
15. Ting · 1996
16. Singularities in 2D anisotropic potential problems in multimaterial corners: Real variable approach10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00292-0 ↗
17. Effect of load distribution and placement in the Iosipescu shear test10.1177/073168449801700102 ↗