journal article·2006-11

Residual strength prediction of damaged composite fuselage panel with R-curve method

John T. Wang, Clarence C. Poe, Damodar R. Ambur, David W. Sleight

Composites Science and Technology· Volume 66· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This study applies the crack growth resistance curve (R-curve) method to predict the residual strength of a composite fuselage panel with discrete source damage. The R-curve is constructed from the energy release rates computed from cracked tensile plate test specimens at their failure loads. To predict the residual strength of a curved fuselage panel with discrete source damage using the R-curve method, G-curves of the energy release rate of the damaged fuselage panel need to be established. These G-curves are generated for various fuselage pressures over a range of crack lengths. Since this study found that the membrane stiffening effect could significantly reduce the energy release rate at the crack tip of a pressurized fuselage, geometrically nonlinear behavior was considered in the calculations. The residual strength of the damaged fuselage panel was determined by comparing the energy release rates with the “allowable-like” R-curve. The correlation between the crack growth predictions and the damage progression results obtained from experiments is very good. Therefore, the R-curve method has the potential to be a practical engineering method for predicting the residual strength of damaged fuselage panels.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. CC Poe Jr, CE Harris, TW Cotes, TH Walker. Tension strength with discrete source damage. In: Proceedings of the fifth NASA/DoD ACT conference, NASA CP 3294, vol. I, part 1, 1994. p. 369–437.
2. TH Walker, LB Ilcewicz, DR Polland, CC Poe Jr. Tension fracture of laminates for transport fuselage. Part II: Large notches. In: Proceedings of the third NASA/DoD ACT conference, NASA CP-3178, part 2, 1992. p. 727–758.
3. TH Walker, LB Ilcewicz , DR Polland, JB Bodine, CC Poe Jr. Tension fracture of laminates for transport fuselage. Part III: Structural configurations. In: Proceedings of the fourth NASA/DoD ACT conference, NASA CP-3229, part 1, 1993. p. 863–880.
4. Tan · 1994
5. A progressive damage model for laminated composites containing stress concentrations10.1177/002199838702100904 ↗
6. Analytical prediction of damage growth in notched composite panels loaded in compression10.2514/2.2688 ↗
7. JT Wang, CG Lotts, DW Sleight. Analysis of discrete-source damage progression in a tensile stiffened composite panel. In: Proceedings of the 40th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, AIAA Paper No. 99–1336, St. Louis, MO, April 12–15, 1999.10.2514/6.1999-1336 ↗
8. Fracture mechanics analysis of pressurized cracked shallow shells10.1016/0013-7944(77)90037-6 ↗
9. Computational schemes for integrity analysis of fuselage panels in aging airplanes10.1007/978-3-642-84364-8_2 ↗
10. Broek · 1986
11. Macroscopic fracture mechanics of advanced composite materials10.1177/002199837100500402 ↗
12. Fracture mechanics correlation for tensile failure of filamentary composites with holes10.2514/3.44618 ↗
13. The buckling behavior of a central crack in a plate under tension10.1016/0013-7944(92)90197-M ↗
14. Some computational tools for the analysis of through cracks in stiffened fuselage shells10.1007/BF00370132 ↗
15. Post-buckling behavior of centrally cracked plates under tension10.1299/jsme1987.30.1714 ↗
16. JT Wang, DY Xue, DW Sleight, JM Housner. Computation of energy release rates for cracked composite panels with nonlinear deformation. In: Proceedings of the 36th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, part 4, AIAA-95-1463-CP, 1995. p. 2713–2727.10.2514/6.1995-1463 ↗
17. JH Starnes Jr, VO Britt, RD Young, CC Rankin, CP Shore, NJC Bains. Nonlinear analysis of damaged stiffened fuselage shells subjected to combined loads. In: Proceedings of the FAA/NASA international symposium on advanced structural integrity methods for airframe durability and damage tolerance, NASA CP-3274, part 2, 1994. p. 1045–1075.
18. A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral10.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3 ↗
19. JT Wang, IS Raju, DW Sleight. Fracture mechanics analysis of composite skin-stiffener debond configurations with shell elements. In: Proceedings of the 35th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, part 2, AIAA-94-1389-CP, 1994. p. 676–693.10.2514/6.1994-1389 ↗
20. The computational structural mechanics testbed user’s manual, NASA TM-100644, 1989.
21. A curved Co plate element based on assumed natural-coordinate strains10.1115/1.3171752 ↗
22. Crisfield · 1991 · vol. 1