A comparative analysis of acoustic emission sensor embedding in glass fibre composite
Source abstract
Abstract
The manufacturing process of composite structures permits fully embedding acoustic emission (AE) sensors. While the embedding process may pose challenges, its advantages, if proven, can outweigh the challenges. The increased sensitivity resulting from embedding acoustic emission sensors in composites is still not definitively established. A test was set up with pre-determined AE initiation locations (surface and sub-surface) and pre-determined receiving sensor's location (surface and sub-surface) to ensure any sensitivity increase was evident. The receiving sensor's attenuation along (at 90°) and across the fibres (at 45°) was assessed using two test methods: pencil lead breaking (PLB) and actuator methods. The actuator method involved using two pulse generators, the TGP110 pulse generator and the Mistras FieldCal. A range of specific frequencies were utilised, 30, 60, 150 and 300 kHz, using the FieldCal. The results obtained from the test methods were not in agreement with each other. For example, comparing the sensitivity using surface cracks, the PLB method showed decreased sensitivity when embedding the receiving sensor compared to the actuator method, which demonstrated minimal changes in sensitivity. The research aims to clarify the sensitivity increase obtained when embedding an AE sensor while taking into account the crack's position and frequency.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Rumsey · 2008
2. Giurgiutiu · 2016 · 317
3. Online structural integrity monitoring of high-performance composite rocket motor casing
4. Wilkerson · 1996
5. Damage-induced acoustic emission source monitoring in a honeycomb sandwich composite structure10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.071 ↗
6. A new algorithm for acoustic emission localization and flexural group velocity determination in anisotropic structures10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.08.013 ↗
7. Acoustic emission source location in composite materials using Delta T Mapping10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.01.023 ↗
8. Use of piezoelectric as acoustic emission sensor for in situ monitoring of composite structures10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.06.003 ↗
9. Structural health monitoring by acoustic emission of smart composite laminates embedded with piezoelectric sensor10.1007/978-3-642-37143-1_37 ↗
10. Investigation of the strength of the failure modes in GFRP laminates using acoustic emission monitoring
11. Three point bending test of glass/epoxy composite health monitoring by acoustic emission10.1016/j.aej.2019.03.006 ↗
12. Fotouhi M., Heidary H., Ahmadi M., Pashmforoush F. Characterization of composite materials damage under quasi-static three-point bending test using wavelet and fuzzy C-means clustering. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998311425968. SAGE PublicationsSage UK: London, England; 1 February 2012; 46(15): 1795–1808. Available at: DOI:10.1177/0021998311425968 (Accessed: 25 December 2022).10.1177/0021998311425968 ↗
13. Delamination evaluation of composite laminates with different interface fiber orientations using acoustic emission features and micro visualization
14. Cluster analysis of acoustic emission signals and deformation measurement for delaminated glass fiber epoxy composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.04.081 ↗
15. Built-in sensor network for structural health monitoring of composite structure10.1177/1045389X06064353 ↗
16. Use of PVDF as acoustic emission sensor for in situ monitoring of mechanical behaviour of glass/epoxy laminates10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.04.006 ↗
17. Integration of piezoelectric transducers (PZT and PVDF) within polymer-matrix composites for structural health monitoring applications: new success and challenges
18. Fatigue behaviour and structural health monitoring by acoustic emission of E-glass/epoxy laminates with piezoelectric implant10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.10.024 ↗
19. Monitoring of impacted aramid-reinforced composites by embedded PVDF acoustic emission sensors10.1111/j.1475-1305.2007.00374.x ↗
20. Mechanical behavior and health monitoring by Acoustic Emission of unidirectional and cross-ply laminates integrated by piezoelectric implant10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.04.011 ↗
21. Mechanical behaviour and health monitoring by acoustic emission of sandwich composite integrated by piezoelectric implant10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.05.032 ↗
22. Effect of piezoelectric implant on the structural integrity of composite laminates subjected to tensile loads10.1007/s10443-016-9513-4 ↗
23. Towards in-situ acoustic emission-based health monitoring in bio-based composites structures: does embedment of sensors affect the mechanical behaviour of flax/epoxy laminates?
24. Sause · 2017 · 291
25. Hellier · 2020
26. Pant · 2013
27. A review on acoustic emission testing for structural health monitoring of polymer-based composites10.3390/s23156945 ↗