On microscopic analysis of fracture in unidirectional composite material using phase field modelling
Source abstract
Abstract
The demand for composite materials is higher than ever before. Effective and reliable modelling techniques allowing for better understanding of their failure are critical for designing future optimised light-weight structures. However, failure of composite at the microscopic level is a complex phenomenon and it has often been analysed using empirical approaches. A promising alternative, that instead takes a physics-based approach, is the phase-field model (PFM). This approach has been applied comprehensively to homogeneous materials and has briefly been extended to composite laminae, as modelled by Kanninen's local heterogeneous region (LHR). Despite this progress, a systematic investigation of the implications and requirements of using PFM for studying fracture in composite materials seems incomplete and missing links between the physical and the numerical aspects. This work aims to fill that gap and discusses in detail the role of the critical parameters in a PFM analysis of fracture, including length-scale interactions and concerns on convergence. The present analysis is framed around the problem of toughening of composites by weakening the matrix/fibre interface. Here, the PFM proves very efficient tool allowing recognition of multiple failure modes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids
2. Analysis of stress and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate10.1115/1.4011547 ↗
3. Origins of the stress intensity factor approach to fracture10.1243/03093247V104198 ↗
4. Sivakumar · 2014 · 829
5. Smith · 2009
6. Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-9 ↗
7. X. Zhang, C. Vignes, S. Sloan, D. Sheng, Numerical evaluation of the phase-field model for brittle fracture with emphasis on the length scale, Comput. Mech. 59.10.1007/s00466-017-1373-8 ↗
8. Phase field modeling of crack propagation10.1080/14786431003773015 ↗
9. A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits10.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011 ↗
10. F. Aksu Denli, O. Gueltekin, G. Holzapfel, H. Dal, A phase-field model for fracture of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites, Comput. Mech. 65.10.1007/s00466-019-01812-1 ↗
11. A length scale insensitive phase-field damage model for brittle fracture10.1016/j.jmps.2018.06.006 ↗
12. A new multiscale phase field method to simulate failure in composites10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.08.010 ↗
13. M. Kanninen, E. Rybicki, W. Griffith, Preliminary Development of a Fundamental Analysis Model for Crack Growth in a Fiber Reinforced Composite Material, Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Fourth Conference).
14. A phase-field model for strength and fracture analyses of fiber-reinforced composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.10.031 ↗
15. Phase field predictions of microscopic fracture and r-curve behaviour of fibre-reinforced composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108539 ↗
16. Gradient damage models and their use to approximate brittle fracture10.1177/1056789510386852 ↗
17. Interface
18. Y. Mao, J. Coenen, J. Riesch, S. Sistla, J. Almanstötter, B. Jasper, A. Terra, T. Hoeschen, H. Gietl, C. Linsmeier, C. Broeckmann, Influence of the interface strength on the mechanical properties of discontinuous tungsten fiber-reinforced tungsten composites produced by field assisted sintering technology, Compos. Appl. Sci. Manuf. 107.10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.01.022 ↗
19. Hinton · 2004
20. Fracture mechanics in composite materials10.1016/0010-4361(79)90023-5 ↗
21. Skovsgaard · 2021 · 114418
22. Fracture analysis of unidirectional composites10.1177/002199837300700207 ↗
23. Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9 ↗
24. Phase-field modeling of fracture10.1016/bs.aams.2019.08.001 ↗
25. Phase field modeling of quasi-static and dynamic crack propagation: comsol implementation and case studies10.1016/j.advengsoft.2018.03.012 ↗
26. Fracture properties prediction of clay/epoxy nanocomposites with interphase zones using a phase field model10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.08.002 ↗
27. Stochastic analysis of the fracture toughness of polymeric nanoparticle composites using polynomial chaos expansions10.1007/s10704-017-0210-6 ↗
28. Transfer learning enhanced physics informed neural network for phase-field modeling of fracture10.1016/j.tafmec.2019.102447 ↗
29. A unified phase-field theory for the mechanics of damage and quasi-brittle failure10.1016/j.jmps.2017.03.015 ↗
30. Phase-field modeling of ductile fracture10.1007/s00466-015-1151-4 ↗
31. Nettles · 1994
32. Mileiko · 1997
33. Phase-field modelling of interface failure in brittle materials10.1016/j.cma.2018.11.020 ↗
34. Interface debonding ahead of a primary crack10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00101-5 ↗
35. A revisited criterion for crack deflection at an interface in a brittle bimaterial10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00067-7 ↗
36. Kinking of a crack out of an interface10.1115/1.3176078 ↗