Effect of multiaxiality, stacking sequence and number of off-axis layers on the mechanical response and damage sequence of carbon/epoxy composite laminates under static loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The mechanical response and damage sequence of composite materials are nowadays still a topic of ongoing research. However, many parameters influencing their overall behavior are still not thoroughly taken into consideration. The effect of multiaxial stresses, the distinction between balanced and unbalanced configurations and the influence of the number of off-axis layers are just a few to mention. Experimental data regarding the effect of all these parameters on the damage progression in composites is of great importance, since it is proven that commonly used failure criteria, neglecting the occurring damage mechanisms, cannot always predict the material response. In this work, a study of the influence of all these parameters is attempted, by testing carbon/epoxy laminates with different off-axis angles to account for different multiaxiality. Both balanced and unbalanced laminates are taken into account, considering the lack of experimental evidence in literature regarding the latter case, and significant differences between the two lay-ups are reported for the first time. Finally, the influence of the number of the off-axis layers on the mechanical response in conjunction with the previous parameters is also studied through elaborate damage observations.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Predicting failure in composite laminates: the background to the exercise10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00074-8 ↗
2. Yield and failure criteria for composite materials under static and dynamic loading10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.11.003 ↗
3. Yield and failure theory for unidirectional polymer-matrix composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.071 ↗
4. Stress based yield/failure criteria for fiber composites10.1016/S0020-7683(96)00038-8 ↗
5. Predictions of the original and truncated maximum-strain failure models for certain fibrous composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00192-9 ↗
6. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00208-1 ↗
7. A re-examination of the analysis of in-plane matrix failures in fibrous composite laminates10.1016/0266-3538(95)00124-7 ↗
8. Mixed-mode quasi-static failure criteria for adhesively-bonded pultruded GFRP joints10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.12.007 ↗
9. Damage and fatigue in composites – a personal account10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.04.042 ↗
10. Effect of axial shear and transverse tension on early failure events in unidirectional polymer matrix composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.01.031 ↗
11. A review of multiaxial/biaxial loading tests for composite materials10.1016/0010-4361(93)90247-6 ↗
12. Failure analysis of plain woven glass/epoxy laminates: comparison of off-axis and biaxial tension loadings10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.04.010 ↗
13. Prediction of the failure locus of C/PEEK composites under transverse compression and longitudinal shear through computational micromechanics10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.07.011 ↗
14. Hinton · 2004
15. Model to predict effects of triaxial loading on ply cracking in general symmetric laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00086-5 ↗
16. A damage model for the simulation of delamination in advanced composites under variable-mode loading10.1016/j.mechmat.2005.10.003 ↗
17. Multiple transverse cracking and stiffness reduction in cross-ply laminates10.1520/CTR10213J ↗
18. A progressive analysis of matrix cracking-induced delamination in composite laminates using an advanced phantom node method10.1177/0021998316684203 ↗
19. Micromechanical prediction of damage due to transverse ply cracking under fatigue loading in composite laminates10.1177/0731684416676635 ↗
20. Statistical model for initiation governed intralaminar cracking in composite laminates during tensile quasi-static and cyclic tests10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.05.030 ↗
21. Damage initiation and evolution in glass/epoxy tubes subjected to combined tension-torsion fatigue loading10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.01.002 ↗
22. A synergistic damage mechanics approach to mechanical response of composite laminates with ply cracks10.1177/0021998312466121 ↗
23. A synergistic damage mechanics based multiscale model for composite laminates subjected to multiaxial strains10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.01.005 ↗
24. Damage in composite laminates with off-axis plies10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00070-6 ↗
25. Multiaxial damage characterization of carbon/epoxy angle-ply laminates under static tension by combining in situ microscopy with acoustic emission10.3390/app8112021 ↗
26. On extension-shearing bending-twisting coupled laminates10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.041 ↗
27. Effects of shallow biangle, thin-ply laminates on structural performance of composite wings10.2514/1.J055465 ↗
28. Optimal configurations of bistable piezo-composites for energy harvesting10.1063/1.3693523 ↗
29. On acoustic emission for failure investigation in CFRP: pattern recognition and peak frequency analyses10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.11.014 ↗
30. Contribution of AE analysis in order to evaluate time to failure of ceramic matrix composites10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.03.006 ↗
31. Health monitoring of FRP using acoustic emission and artificial neural networks10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.02.015 ↗
32. Damage evolution under cyclic multiaxial stress state: a comparative analysis between glass/epoxy laminates and tubes10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.01.056 ↗
33. Nano structural analysis on stiffening phenomena of PAN-based carbon fibers during tensile deformation10.1016/j.carbon.2014.04.073 ↗
34. A variational model for free-edge interlaminar stress analysis in general symmetric and thin-ply composite laminates10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.012 ↗
35. Variational analysis of free-edge stress and displacement fields in general un-symmetric and thin-ply laminates under in-plane, bending and thermal loading10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.07.030 ↗
36. Characterization of matrix crack-induced laminate failure-Part I: Experiments10.1106/7RN1-PFBN-XQR9-3KDK ↗