journal article·2020-07Open access

3D interfacial debonding during microbond testing: Advantages of local strain recording

R. Dsouza, P. Antunes, M. Kakkonen, J. Jokinen, E. Sarlin, P. Kallio, M. Kanerva

Abstract

The microbond (MB) test is the most widely adopted micromechanical test to characterize fibre matrix interfaces but typically lacks reliability and output for determining multi-parameter interface models. In the current research, the MB test is enhanced by incorporating Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors for local fibre strain monitoring. Strain-force data is used to analyse and validate the type and paramter values of a cohesive zone modelling (CZM) basis in the three-dimensional interface damage model. For the prepared epoxy resin droplets, that are used as a benchmark case, a bi-linear CZM traction-separation law is fitted for each droplet. The results confirm the selection of maximum FBG strain, force–strain profile with the two primary peaks in the force–strain derivative, and the peak force to be valid for proper interface characterization. The analysis of the performed tests clearly reveal the droplet fracture process to consist of four distinct stages. Only after the first stage, interfacial crack propagation independent of the point on perimeter is achieved. Full debonding occurs during the fourth stage.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Meso-structure ageing mechanism of 3-D braided composite’s compressive behaviors under accelerated thermo-oxidative ageing environment10.1016/j.mechmat.2017.09.002 ↗
2. Influence of specimen type and reinforcement on measured tension–tension fatigue life of unidirectional GFRP laminates10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.12.008 ↗
3. Characterization of fiber/matrix interface strength: applicability of different tests, approaches and parameters10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.003 ↗
4. A microbond method for determination of the shear strength of a fiber/resin interface10.1016/0266-3538(87)90059-5 ↗
5. Interface strength in glass fibre–polypropylene measured using the fibre pull-out and microbond methods10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.005 ↗
6. Microbond testing and finite element simulation of fibre-microballoon-epoxy ternary composites10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.12.029 ↗
7. Standard test methods for delamination resistance of composite materials: current status10.1023/A:1008869811626 ↗
8. Fracture mechanics tests in adhesively bonded joints: a literature review10.1080/00218464.2013.859075 ↗
9. Determining the interfacial toughness from force–displacement curves in the pull-out and microbond tests using the alternative method10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.10.020 ↗
10. Finite element analysis of the microdroplet test method using cohesive zone model of the fiber/matrix interface10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.10.021 ↗
11. M. von Essen, E. Sarlin, O. Tanhuanpää, M. Kakkonen, P. Laurikainen, M. Hoikkanen, R. Haakana, J. Vuorinen, P. Kallio, Automated high-throughput microbond tester for interfacial shear strength studies, in: The SAMPE Europe Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, Held in November 14–16, 2017.
12. Deformation micromechanics in model carbon fiber reinforced composites part II: The microbond test10.1177/004051759706700204 ↗
13. Finite element evaluation of the microbond test: meniscus effect, interphase region, and vise angle10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00256-7 ↗
14. Optical sensors for bond-slip characterization and monitoring of RC structures10.1016/j.sna.2018.07.042 ↗
15. Influence of a matrix crack on stress transfer to an α-alumina fibre in epoxy resin using FEA and photoelasticity10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.027 ↗
16. R. Dsouza, P. Antunes, M. Kakkonen, J. Jokinen, E. Sarlin, P. Kallio, M. Kanerva, Experimental and numerical dataset of Microbond test using optical fibres for strain, Data in Brief (2020). submitted for publication.10.1016/j.dib.2020.106017 ↗
17. On the influence of the shape of the interface law on the application of cohesive-zone models10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.024 ↗
18. A comparison of several fracture mechanics methods for measuring interfacial toughness with microbond tests10.1080/00218469508014371 ↗
19. Future microbond testing-finite element simulation of optical fibers for strains
20. A cohesive zone model incorporating a Coulomb friction law for fiber-reinforced composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.01.037 ↗