Deformation and energy absorption of composite egg-box panels
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Static compressive tests of composite egg-box panels, whose stacking sequences and number of plies were controlled, were carried out to investigate their deformation behaviour and energy absorption capacity. Silicon rubber moulds were first moulded from an aluminium egg-box panel template. These moulds were in turn used to fabricate composite specimens. Two fabric prepregs, carbon/epoxy plain weave fabric and glass/epoxy 4-harness satin weave were draped over the rubber mould with various stacking angles. The specimens were cured in an autoclave using vacuum bag degassing moulding and an appropriate cure cycle. The nominal stress–strain relations of the specimens were compared and multiply-interrupted compressive tests were used to identify fracture initiation and development. The energy absorption per unit mass of composite egg-box panels were compared with that of an aluminium egg-box panel. From the test results it was concluded that the compressive behaviour of the composite structure is affected by the local stacking sequence of the fabrics and by shear deformation during initial lay-up and draping. By considering the stress–stain behaviour, energy absorption and material cost, the optimal material and draping condition were proposed for a composite egg-box panel.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures · Material Properties and Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Gibson · 1999
2. FE modelling of deformation localization in metallic foams10.1016/S0168-874X(01)00096-8 ↗
3. Material characterization of a composite-foam sandwich for the front structure of a high speed train10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00028-X ↗
4. Kindervater CM, Georgi H. Composite strength and energy absorption as an aspect of structural crash resistance. In: Structural crashworthiness and failure, 1993. p. 189–235.
5. The plastic collapse and energy absorption capacity of egg-box panels10.1016/S0020-7403(03)00136-X ↗
6. Energy absorption of an egg-box material10.1016/S0022-5096(02)00052-2 ↗
7. Comparison of different thermoplastic cellular textile composites on their energy absorption capacity10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.03.018 ↗
8. The energy-absorbing capacity of grid-domed textile composites10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00174-8 ↗
9. The effect of pin reinforcement upon the through-thickness compressive strength of foam-cored sandwich panels10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00273-2 ↗
10. Mechanical properties balance in novel Z-pinned sandwich panels; out-of-plane properties10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.029 ↗
11. Inverse drape modelling—an investigation of the set of shapes that can be formed from continuous aligned woven fibre reinforcements10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.12.001 ↗
12. Buckling and large deformation behaviour of composite domes compressed between rigid platens10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.05.007 ↗
13. ASTM D695-96 standard test method for compressive properties of rigid plastics.
14. ASTM D3039/D3039M-00 standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials.
15. The relation between compressive strength of carbon/epoxy fabrics and micro-tow geometry with various bias angles10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.04.023 ↗