Experimental investigation on fly ash particulate reinforcement for property enhancement of PU foam core FRP sandwich composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Low-cost industrial byproduct fly ash (FA) particulates were used as reinforcement to improve the mechanical performance of Polyurethane (PU) foam core and PU based laminated sandwich composites. PU foam core specimens were prepared with 5–20 wt % variation of FA fillers with surface treatment using silane solution. Surface treated core specimens were found to exhibit higher shear strength than untreated specimens due to superior interface adhesion properties and uniform distribution of particles. Two different face sheet-core combination sandwiched composite specimens were designed using woven fabric glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) and carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) face sheet with surface treated PU foam core. Since shear and bending being the predominant modes of failures in sandwiched composite structures, accordingly shear and three-point bending tests were conducted as per ASTM standard. Enhanced stiffness and up to 39% increase in shear modulus was observed for FA reinforced PU foam (FA-PUF) core than the neat PU core due to a synergistic effect of interfacial bonding between FA and polymer. SEM images explained the enhanced particle dispersion and strut characteristics. With an optimized FA reinforcement, the mechanical performance of the sandwiched composites was found to improve significantly as evidenced from the flexural and shear test diagrams.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer composites and self-healing · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. The effect of sea water exposure on the interfacial fracture of some sandwich systems in marine use10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.01.009 ↗
2. The hierarchical structure and mechanics of plant materials10.1098/rsif.2012.0341 ↗
3. Flexure of layered cranial bone10.1016/0021-9290(71)90031-5 ↗
4. Bioinspired structural materials10.1038/nmat4089 ↗
5. Environmental impacts of coal combustion residues10.2134/jeq1993.00472425002200020002x ↗
6. Gibson · 1999
7. The mechanics of three-dimensional cellular materials
8. Mechanical behavior of reinforced polyurethane foams10.1002/pc.750040206 ↗
9. Tailoring mechanical properties of highly porous polymer foams: silica particle reinforced polymer foams via emulsion templating10.1016/j.polymer.2006.03.114 ↗
10. Tough reinforced open porous polymer foams via concentrated emulsion templating10.1016/j.polymer.2006.09.022 ↗
11. Mechanical properties of a particle‐strengthened polyurethane foam10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19991209)74:11<2724::AID-APP20>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
12. Mechanical properties of high density polyurethane foams: II Effect of the filler size10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.03.008 ↗
13. Critical size effect of particles reinforcing foamed composite materials10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.09.024 ↗
14. Damping and sound absorption properties of particle reinforced Al matrix composite foams10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00215-4 ↗
15. Enhanced mechanical performance of foam core sandwich composites with through the thickness reinforced core10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.04.055 ↗
16. Additive manufacturing of syntactic foams: Part 2: specimen printing and mechanical property characterization10.1007/s11837-017-2731-x ↗
17. Effect of arctic environment on flexural behavior of fly ash cenosphere reinforced epoxy syntactic foams10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.06.035 ↗
18. Effect of surface silanization of carbon fiber on mechanical properties of carbon fiber reinforced polyurethane composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.01.022 ↗
19. Polyurethane rigid foams reinforced by doubly modified nanosilica10.1177/0021955X09350526 ↗
20. Experimental characterization of temperature dependent dynamic properties of glass fiber reinforced polyurethane foams10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.12.013 ↗
21. Analysis of the composite I-beam reinforced with PU foam with the addition of chopped glass fiber10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.03.036 ↗
22. Effect of the cenospheres size and internally lateral constraints on dynamic compressive behavior of fly ash cenospheres polyurethane syntactic foams10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.05.008 ↗
23. The effect of CNT-reinforced polyurethane foam cores to flexural properties of sandwich composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.019 ↗
24. Manufacturing and characterization of polyurethane based sandwich composite structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.12.042 ↗
25. Pulverized polyurethane foam particles reinforced rigid polyurethane foam and phenolic foam10.1002/app.39734 ↗
26. Impact of the maximum foam reaction temperature on reducing foam shrinkage10.1039/C4RA12540A ↗
27. Evaluation of forming mixture composition impact on properties of water blown rigid polyurethane (PUR) foam from rapeseed oil polyol10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.12.032 ↗
28. 2013
29. 2017
30. 2016
31. 2016
32. Compressive behavior of cenosphere/epoxy syntactic foams in arctic conditions10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.10.006 ↗
33. Enhanced dielectric tunability of Ba0. 6Sr0. 4TiO3/Poly (vinylidene fluoride) composites via interface modification by silane coupling agent10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.04.016 ↗
34. Failure mechanism of sandwich beams subjected to three-point bending10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.07.056 ↗