Bird strike event monitoring in a composite UAV wing using high speed optical fiber sensing system
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, high speed bird strikes on a composite structure were successfully monitored using optical fiber sensors. Four multiplexed optical fiber sensors in a single cable were surface-bonded on the leading edge of a composite UAV wing box. In order to acquire those high frequency signals, a newly developed interrogation system was used to process strain signals from four sensors simultaneously at a sampling frequency of 100 kHz. Before the bird strike tests, pre-impact tests using a rubber hammer were performed to verify the suitability of the FBG signal acquisitions. The pre-test data were used in the neural network training procedures to estimate the bird strike locations. Then, the bird strike tests were accomplished using dummy projectiles and a pneumatic gun. The one-pound dummy birds, made of gelatin, hit the leading edge with a maximum speed of 201 km/h. The impact signals were successfully recorded during the tests and their frequency characteristics were then analyzed. Finally, the strike locations were estimated with the neural network which was trained through the pre-tests. The average error was 33.6 mm.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors · Advanced Measurement and Detection Methods · Electromagnetic Launch and Propulsion Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. MacKinnon B. Sharing the skies TP13549. Transport Canada; 2004.
2. Richard AD, Sandra EW, John W, Michael JB. Wildlife strikes to civil aircraft in the United States 1990–2008 FAA; 2009.
3. Anon Sec. A.3.2.24.4 Other FOD joint service specification guide. Aircraft structures, JSSG-2006 Department of Defense; 1998.
4. Anon Sec. 25.631 Bird strike damage certification specification for large aeroplanes CS 25 EASA; 2003.
5. Anon Sec. 25.631 Bird strike damage airworthiness standards; transport category airplanes FAR23 FAA; 2003.
6. Anon Sec. 3.2.24.1 Bird FOD joint service specification guide aircraft structures JSSG-2006 Department of Defense; 1998.
7. Design and testing of a fiber-metal-laminate bird-strike-resistant leading edge10.2514/1.43943 ↗
8. Aluminum foams as a filler for leading edge: improvements in the mechanical behavior under bird strike impact tests10.1016/j.matdes.2010.08.035 ↗
9. A review of soft body impact on composite structure
10. Bird-strike simulation for certification of the Boeing 787 composite movable trailing edge10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.025 ↗
11. Neubauer M, Gunther G, Fullhas K. Structural design aspects and criteria for military UAV RTO-AVT 145; 2007.
12. Staszewski · 2004
13. Damage detection in composite using optical fiber sensors
14. First deminsys (high speed FBG interrogator) flight
15. Guided wave and damage detection in composite laminates using different optic sensors10.3390/s90504005 ↗
16. Structural damage location with fiber Bragg grating Rosettes and Lamb waves10.1177/1475921707081974 ↗
17. Haykin · 1994
18. Acousto-ultrasonic sensing using fiber Bragg gratings10.1088/0964-1726/12/1/314 ↗
19. Multiplexed fiber Bragg grating strain sensor system with a Fabry–Perot wavelength filter10.1364/OL.18.001370 ↗
20. Stabilized interrogation and multiplexing techniques for fibre Bragg grating vibration sensors10.1088/0957-0233/16/3/024 ↗
21. Lee BW, Seo MS, Oh HG, Park CY. Real-time instrument for structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of ICCM18; 2011.
22. Impact monitoring of smart composite laminates using neural network and wavelet analysis10.1106/N5E7-M37Y-3MAR-2KFH ↗
23. Detection of impact location for composite stiffened panel using FBG sensors10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.123-125.895 ↗
24. Howard · 2002
25. Standard test method for bird impact testing of aerospace transparent enclosure
26. Optical fiber sensor systems for simultaneously monitoring of strain and fractures in composites10.1088/0964-1726/14/5/N02 ↗