Mechanical behaviour of circular and triangular glass fibres and their composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Single fibre testing of circular (CircGF) and triangular (TriGF) glass fibres of equivalent cross-section has shown the TriGF to have a 25% higher average tensile strength compared to CircGF. Micro-composite compression testing (using resin bonded tows of 12–15 filaments) has revealed the TriGF to have a compression strength 60% greater than CircGF. Some of the increase can be attributed to an effective increase in second moment of area for the TriGF specimens due to imperfect packing. However, allowing for this effect there still appears to be an underlying significant improvement in compressive strength performance attributable to the inherent fibre shape. Mechanical testing under tensile load has shown that the triangular glass fibre reinforced plastic (TriGFRP) performs marginally better (20%) than that manufactured using circular fibre (CircGFRP) for equivalent fibre volume fractions. Similarly, under compressive loading the TriGFRP outperforms CircGFRP by a significant margin of 40%. Interlaminar shear testing has also indicated that TriGFRP may offer a performance advantage of approximately 5%, although this needs further verification to be conclusive.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (12)
Show source-provided references
1. Determining the through-thickness properties of FRP materials10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00026-8 ↗
2. Ball J. Advanced primary composite structures: analysis and guidelines. Part 1: flat plate impact. BAE Systems Airbus Document No.: APRICOS-DE-1.2–03–1/BAE Systems (BE95–1017) December 1999.
3. Crocker P. Advanced primary composite structures: analysis and guidelines. Part 2: flat plate residual compression strength. BAE Systems Airbus Document No.: APRICOS-DE-1.2–03–1/BAE Systems (BE95–1017) November 1999.
4. The relative effects of through-thickness properties and fibre orientation on energy absorption by continuous fibre composites10.1016/S1359-8368(98)00066-3 ↗
5. Translaminar reinforced composites—a review10.1520/CTR10607J ↗
6. Influence of fibre cross-sectional aspect ratio on mechanical properties of glass fibre/epoxy composites. I. Tensile and flexure behaviour10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00168-7 ↗
7. Influence of fibre cross-sectional aspect ratio on mechanical properties of glass fibre/epoxy composites. II. Interlaminar fracture and impact behaviour10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00033-0 ↗
8. Hucker M, Bond I. Optimisation of hollow glass fibres and their composites. Proc. of the 12th International Conference on Composite Materials, June 1999, Paris. Woodhead Publishing. 1999.10.1177/096369359900800406 ↗
9. Optimisation of hollow glass fibres and their composites10.1177/096369359900800406 ↗
10. Hucker MJ, Bond I, Haq S, Bleay S, Foreman A. Influence of manufacturing parameters on the tensile strengths of hollow and solid glass fibres. J Mater Sci 2001 [In Press].10.1023/A:1004812202540 ↗
11. Bond I. Optimisation of hollow glass fibre composites—final report. DERA Agreement No.: MSS/4U3869. Technical Report AE0017. Department of Aerospace Engineering, University of Bristol. May 2000.
12. Curtis P T, editor. “CRAG test methods for the measurement of the engineering properties of fibre reinforced plastics. Unpublished RAE Report, Royal Aerospace Establishment, February, 1988.