journal article·2012-08

Core material effect on wave number and vibrational damping characteristics in carbon fiber sandwich composites

James Sargianis, Jonghwan Suhr

Composites Science and Technology· Volume 72· Issue 13
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract A sandwich composite is typically designed to possess high bending stiffness and low density and consists of two thin and stiff skin sheets and a lightweight core. Due to the high stiffness-to-weight and strength-to-weight ratios, sandwich composite materials are widely used in various structural applications including aircraft, spacecraft, automotive, wind-turbine blades and so on. However, sandwich composite structures used in such applications often suffer from poor acoustic performance. Ironically, these superior mechanical properties make the sandwich composites “excellent” noise radiators. There is a growing interest in optimizing and developing a new sandwich composite which will meet the high stiffness-to-weight ratio and offer improved acoustic performance. The focus of this study is to investigate the structural–vibrational performance of carbon-fiber face sheet sandwich composite beams with varying core materials and properties. Core materials utilized in this study included Nomex and Kevlar Honeycomb cores, and Rohacell foam cores with different densities and shear moduli. The structural–vibrational performance including acoustic and vibrational damping properties was experimentally characterized by analyzing the wave number response, and structural damping loss factor (η) from the frequency response functions, respectively. It was observed that the relationship between the slopes of the wave number data for frequencies above 1000 Hz is inversely proportional to the core material’s specific modulus (G/ρ). The analysis also showed the importance of using a honeycomb core’s effective properties for equal comparison to foam-cored sandwich structures. Utilizing analytical modeling, the loss factors of the core materials (β) was determined based upon the measured structural loss factors (η) for a frequency range up to 4000 Hz. It was determined that low shear modulus cores have similar material damping values to structural damping values. However as the core’s shear modulus increases, the percent difference between these values is found to increase linearly. It was also observed that high structural damping values correlated to low wave number amplitudes, which correspond to reductions in the level of noise radiation from the structure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research · Cellular and Composite Structures · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. Li Z. Vibrational and acoustical properties of sandwich composite materials. Ph.D. Thesis, Auburn University; 2006.
2. Sound transmission loss of honeycomb sandwich panels10.3397/1.2888387 ↗
3. Wave speeds of honeycomb sandwich structures: an experimental approach10.1016/j.apacoust.2009.07.017 ↗
4. Low frequency sound insulation using stiffness control with honeycomb panels10.1016/j.apacoust.2006.12.001 ↗
5. Wave propagation in a sandwich structure10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.04.023 ↗
6. He H, Gmerek M. Measurement and prediction of wave speeds of honeycomb structures. Noise Eng Boeing Commer Airplane Group. 1999;AIAA.10.2514/6.1999-1965 ↗
7. Wave propagation in and sound transmission through sandwich plates10.1016/0022-460X(90)90705-5 ↗
8. Grosveld · 2006
9. New wall design for high transmission loss or high damping10.1121/1.1907780 ↗
10. Pierce, Allan D. Acoustics: an introduction to its physical principles and applications. Acoust Soc Am 1989:149.
11. Sargianis, Suhr. Effect of core thickness on noise and vibration mitigation in sandwich composites. Compos Sci Technol 2012; 72:724–30.10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.01.024 ↗
12. Yong-Joe Kim. Acoustical characteristics of honeycomb sandwich composite panels. In: The 160th meeting of the acoustical society of America, Seattle, WA; 2001.
13. Mead · 1999
14. Criteria for comparing the effectiveness of damping treatments10.1121/1.2369445 ↗
15. Introduction to the two-microphone cross-spectral method of determining sound intensity10.3397/1.2827629 ↗
16. Thamburaj P. Structural-acoustic studies of sandwich structures for global transport aircraft, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Delaware; 2001.
17. Thamburaj P, Sun JQ. Optimization of anisotropic sandwich beams for higher sound transmission loss. J Sound Vib 2002;254(1):23–36.10.1006/jsvi.2001.4059 ↗
18. Hueseyin Denli. Structural-acoustic optimization of composite sandwich structures. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Delaware; 2007.10.1177/0583102406074086 ↗
19. Loss factors of composite honeycomb sandwich panels10.1006/jsvi.2001.3602 ↗
20. Vibration damping behavior of fiber reinforced composites: a review10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.425.179 ↗
21. Effects of thickness and delamination on the damping in honeycomb- foam sandwich beams10.1016/j.jsv.2005.11.024 ↗
22. Recent Applications of viscoelastic damping for noise control in automobiles and commercial airplanes10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00106-8 ↗
23. Chandra R, Singh SP, Gupta K. Damping studies in fiber-reinforced composites – a review. Compos Struct 1999;(46):41–51.10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00041-0 ↗
24. Optimal sandwich beam design for maximum viscoelastic damping10.1016/0020-7683(87)90094-1 ↗
25. Yim JH et al. A study on material damping of 0° laminated composite sandwich cantilever beams with a viscoelastic layer. Compos Struct 2003;60:367–74.10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00051-5 ↗
26. Jung WJ, Aref AJ. A combined honeycomb and solid viscoelastic material for structural damping application. Mech Mater 2003;53(8):831–44.10.1016/S0167-6636(02)00210-7 ↗
27. Gill MC. Corporation. www.mcgillcorp.com.
28. Vinson J. The behavior of sandwich structures of isotropic and composite materials. Technomic Publishing; 1999.
29. ASTM Standard E756-05. Standard test method for measuring vibration-damping properties of materials; 2010.
30. ASTM Standard D7250. Standard practice for determining sandwich beam flexural and shear stiffness; 2012.
31. Sun · 1995