Apparent strength scaling in continuous fiber composite laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
The tensile strength of the 0°plies within different cross-ply and quasi-isotropic laminates of varying size and stacking sequence has been investigated. For those lay-ups having failure confined to the gauge section, no size effect was observed in the strength of 0°plies. In laminates exhibiting a size versus strength relationship, failures were found to occur in the gauge section for the smallest laminates, but at the grip for the larger laminates. The occurrence of failure at the grips is not obvious for these lay-ups. A major purpose of this paper is to identify the failure initiation point, and the sequence of events that leads to complete fracture of 0°plies in unidirectional laminates, and the quasi-isotropic and cross-ply lay-ups. A statistically significant set of 3-point bend tests of unidirectional beams was conducted to obtain valid parameters (Weibull modulus and strength) for a Weibull-statistics-based strength model which would be used to predict the ultimate strength of 0°plies within different cross-ply and quasi-isotropic laminates. No significant difference between the maximum stress in bending or strength of the valid tensile tests was found. In contrast Weibull theory predicted unidirectional strength loss of over 30% for the range of volumes tested. Although the dramatic strength scaling observed here has been shown to arise from the test method, the authors are not ready to rule out scaling effects. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Workshop on scaling effects in composite materials and structures, compiled by K.E. Jackson, NASA Conference Publication 3271, July 1994.
2. Is there a size effect in composites?10.1016/0010-4361(94)90102-3 ↗
3. Is there a size effect in composites? Comments on designer's corner by Carl Zweben10.1016/0010-4361(94)90112-0 ↗
4. Note on composite size effects10.1520/CTR10147J ↗
5. Weibull W. A statistical theory of the strength of materials. Ing. Vetenskaps Akad. Handl, Royal Swedish Institute Engineering Research Proceedings, NR 151, 1939.
6. Strength ratios of composite materials in flexure and in tension10.1177/002199837400800209 ↗
7. The relationship between tensile-strength and flexure strength in fiber-reinforced composites10.1007/BF02327601 ↗
8. Relationship between strength variability and size effect in unidirectional carbon fibre/epoxy10.1016/0010-4361(91)90102-M ↗
9. The effect of specimen size on the flexural strength of unidirectional carbon fibre-epoxy10.1016/0263-8223(91)90013-O ↗
10. The relationship between tensile and flexural strength of unidirectional composites10.1177/002199839202600805 ↗
11. Scale effects in the response and failure of fiber reinforced composite laminates loaded in tension and flexure10.1177/002199839202601803 ↗
12. O'Brien TK. The effect of delamination on the tensile-strength of unnotched, quasi-isotropic, graphite/epoxy laminates. Proceedings of the 1982 Joint Conference on Experimental Mechanics, Oahu-Maui, Hawaii, 23–28, May 1982. p. 236–243.
13. Kellas S, Morton J. Strength-scaling in fiber composites. AIAA Journal 1992;30(4):1074–80.10.2514/3.11029 ↗
14. Jackson KE, Kellas S. Effect of specimen size on the tensile-strength of geometrically scaled [+θn/−θn/902n]s composite laminates. Army Symposium on Solid Mechanics, 17–19 August, Plymouth, MA, 1993.
15. Johnson DP, Morton J, Kellas S, Jackson KE. Scaling effects in sublaminate-level scaled composite laminates. AIAA Journal 1998;36(3):441–710.2514/2.384 ↗
16. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. Test method D3039/D3039M-95a. Volume 15.03 space simulation; aerospace and aircraft; high modulus fibers and composites. 1996 Annual Book of ASTM Standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1996. p. 111.
17. Hahn HT, Tsai SW. On the behavior of composite laminates after initial failures. Journal of Composite Materials 1974;8(July):288–30510.1177/002199837400800306 ↗
18. Hart-Smith LJ. Generation of higher composite material allowables using improved test coupons. 36th International SAMPE Symposium, Anaheim, CA, 15–18 April, 1991. p. 1029–1044.
19. Sensmeier MD, Griffin OH, Johnson ER. Static and dynamic large deflection flexural response of graphite-epoxy beams. NASA CR 4118, March, 1988.
20. O'Brien TK, Salpekar SA. Scale effects on the transverse tensile-strength of graphite/epoxy composites. In: Camponeschi Jr. editor. Composite materials: testing and design (11th), ASTM STP 1206, Philadelphia, PA. American Society for Testing and Materials. 1993. p. 23–52.10.1520/STP12618S ↗
21. Jamison RD, Schulte K, Reifsnider KL, Stinchcomb WW. Characterization and analysis of damage mechanisms in tension-tension fatigue of graphite/epoxy laminates. Effects of defects in composite materials, ASTM STP 836. PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1984. p. 21–55.10.1520/STP30196S ↗
22. Chaterjee S, Adams D, Oplinger DW. Test methods for composites A status report volume I: tension test methods. Department of Transportation, and Federal Aviation Administration Report, DOT/FAA/CT-93/17, I, June 1993.
23. Stinchcomb WW, Reifsnider KL, Yeung P, Masters J. Effect of ply constraint on fatigue damage development in composite material laminates. Fatigue of Fibrous Composite Materials, ASTM STP 723. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 1981. p. 64–84.10.1520/STP27614S ↗