journal article·2013-06

A modified failure envelope method for failure prediction of multi-bolt composite joints

Fengrui Liu, Libin Zhao, Saqib Mehmood, Jianyu Zhang, Binjun Fei

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a modified failure envelope to predict final failure mode and strength of multi-bolt composite joints based on the conventional failure envelope method, which was presented by Hart-Smith from abundant strength tests of open hole laminates, double-lap single and multi-bolt joints with quasi-isotropic or near-quasi-isotropic lay-ups. In contrast to the bearing “cutoff” of conventional failure envelope method, the modified one takes into account the effect of bypass load on the bearing failure and a new polyline consisted of two oblique lines is proposed. It is able to be established by an additional compressive strength test of laminates and semi-analytical or numerical analysis of fastener-hole laminates and open-hole laminates, combined with the point stress criterion. A flowchart of integration structure failure analysis process with the modified failure envelope method is provided. Series of tests were carried out to provide basic parameters and finite element analysis was conducted for the modified failure envelope. The method proposed was applied to two-bolt and four-bolt carbon-to-carbon double-lap joints with near-quasi-isotropic lay-ups. The predictions of the method proposed and the conventional one were compared with the tests data. The results indicate that the method proposed can obtain effective prediction of failure modes, and more accurate ultimate failure loads in double-lap composite bolted joints.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Holzwarth RC. An overview of the advanced lightweight aircraft fuselage structures (ALAFS) program. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference and exhibit, Salt Lake City, IL; 1996, AIAA-96-1573.10.2514/6.1996-1573 ↗
2. Holzwarth RC. The structural cost and weight reduction potential of more unitized aircraft structure. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 39th structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference and exhibit, Long Beach, IL; 1998, AIAA-98-1872.10.2514/6.1998-1872 ↗
3. Sheahen P, Schmidt R. Primary sandwich structure: a unitized approach. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ ASC 41th structures, structural dynamics and materials conference and exhibit, Atlanta, IL; 2000, AIAA-2000-1430.10.2514/6.2000-1430 ↗
4. Brian B. Composites affordability initiative. In: Proceedings of the AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC 41th structures, structural dynamics and materials conference and exhibit, Atlanta, IL; 2000, AIAA-2000-1379.
5. BOJCAS: bolted joints in composite aircraft structures10.1016/S1290-0958(01)90077-2 ↗
6. BOLJAT a tool for designing composite bolted joints using three-dimensional finite element analysis10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00113-6 ↗
7. Three-dimensional stress analysis of bolted single-lap composite joints10.1016/S0263-8223(98)00103-2 ↗
8. McCombs WF, McQueen JC, Perry JL. Analytical design for aircraft structural joints. AD0831711. US Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory; 1968.10.21236/AD0831711 ↗
9. A global bolted joint model for finite element analysis of load distributions in multi-bolt composite joints10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.03.001 ↗
10. A highly efficient user-defined finite element for load distribution analysis of large-scale bolted composite structures
11. Tate MB, Rosenfeld SJ. Preliminary investigation of the loads carried by individual bolts in bolted joints. NACA Technical Notes NO. 1051. Washington: NACA Langley Aeronautical Lab; 1946.
12. Nelson WD, Bunin BL, Hart-Smith LJ. Critical joints in large composite aircraft structure. NASA CR 3710. Long Beach: McDonnell Douglas Corporation; 1983.
13. Load distribution of multi-fastener laminated composite joints10.1016/0020-7683(93)90209-P ↗
14. Failure analysis of composite pin loaded joints10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00056-9 ↗
15. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites10.1115/1.3153664 ↗
16. Failure criteria for FRP laminates10.1177/0021998305046452 ↗
17. Analysis of laminate strength and its distribution10.1177/002199837801200305 ↗
18. A progressive damage model for mechanically fastened joints in composite laminates10.1177/002199839903302402 ↗
19. Progressive damage analysis of composite bolted joints with liquid shim layers using constant and continuous degradation models10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.05.011 ↗
20. Progressive damage analysis of multi-bolt composite joints with variable bolt-hole clearances10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.11.003 ↗
21. A progressive damage model for laminated composites containing stress concentrations10.1177/002199838702100904 ↗
22. A design methodology for mechanically fastened joints in laminated composite materials10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.02.017 ↗
23. Strength of mechanically fastened composite joints10.1177/002199838201600603 ↗
24. Chang FK, Springer GS, Scott RA. Bolted joints in laminated composites. AD-A141826. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan; 1984.10.2514/6.1984-917 ↗
25. Stress fracture criteria for laminated composites containing stress concentrations10.1177/002199837400800303 ↗
26. Design of composite laminates containing pin loaded holes10.1177/002199838401800306 ↗
27. Failure of composite laminates containing pin loaded holes-method of solution10.1177/002199838401800305 ↗
28. Hart-Smith LJ. Bolted joints in graphite-epoxy composites. NASA CR-144899. Long Beach: Douglas Aircraft Company; 1976.
29. Crews JH, Naik RA. Combined bearing and bypass loading on a graphite/epoxy laminate. NASA-TM-87705. Hampton: Langley Research Center; 1986.10.1016/0263-8223(86)90066-8 ↗
30. Stress analysis and strength prediction of mechanically fastened joints in FRP-a review10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00004-3 ↗
31. Rao BS, Shankar GSS, Krishnaraj V, Krishna K. Stress concentration and its effect on composite bolted joints. In: International symposium of research students on materials science and engineering: ISRS-2004. Chennai, India; 2004. p. 1–10.
32. ASTM D 7248/D 7248M-08. Standard test method for bearing/bypass interaction response of polymer matrix composite laminates using 2-fastener specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 2008.
33. ANSYS User’s Guide.
34. Pilkey · 1997
35. Crews JH, Hong CS, Raju IS. Stress-concentration factors for finite orthotropic laminates with a pin-loaded hole. NASA CR 1862. Hampton: Langley Research Center; 1981.
36. Failure strength of nonlinearly elastic composite laminates containing a pin loaded hole10.1177/002199838401800506 ↗
37. A new method to determine the characteristic lengths of composite joints without testing10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.04.053 ↗
38. ASTM D 3039/D 3039M-00. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 2000.
39. ASTM D 3410/D 3410M-03. Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials with unsupported gage section by shear loading. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 2003.
40. ASTM D 5766/D 5766M-02a. Standard test method for open hole tensile strength of polymer matrix composite laminates. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 2002.
41. ASTM D 5961/D 5961M-01. Standard test method for bearing response of polymer matrix composite laminates. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA; 2001.
42. Bearing failure of bolted composite joints. part I: experimental characterization10.1177/002199839603001201 ↗
43. Bearing strength and failure behavior of bolted composite joints (part I: experimental investigation)10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.02.011 ↗