journal article·2003-05

Bond durability characterization of preservative treated wood and E-glass/phenolic composite interfaces

Cihat Tascioglu, Barry Goodell, Roberto Lopez-Anido

Composites Science and Technology· Volume 63· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of various wood preservative systems and treatment processes (pre- and post-treatment) on wood/FRP composite adhesive bond durability and shear strength. The effects of common wood preservative treatments on the durability of wood and E-glass/phenolic pultruded sheet interfaces and wood/wood interfaces was studied through a standard accelerated cyclic exposure test method. Pre-treatment of individual wood laminations with oil-borne (copper naphthanate, pentachlorophenol and creosote) and water-borne (CCA and CDDC) preservatives increased the delamination between the wood and FRP composite reinforcement with respect to untreated control samples. Post-treatments of wood/FRP composite laminated beams with the same preservative systems had more limited effects than pre-treatments on delamination. In most cases, for both pre and post treatment the wood/FRP delamination was beyond the limit allowed for wood-wood gluelines by the standard. Compatible preservative systems for use with E-glass/phenolic composite reinforcement in pre- and post-treatment applications, which are appropriate for the preservative/pressure treatment used by the wood-lamination industry, were identified. Preservative treatment recommendations were developed.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wood Treatment and Properties · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. Selbo ML. Laminating of preservative treated wood. In: Proceedings of American Wood Preservers' Association. AWPA; 1957. p. 48–55.
2. The gluing of preservative-treated wood for severe service conditions
3. Laminating preservative treated scotch pine
4. Truax TR, Blew JO, Selbo ML. Production of preservative-treated laminated timbers. In Proceedings of American Wood Preservers' Association. AWPA; 1953. p. 113–23.
5. AITC, AITC109-98—standard for preservative treatment of structural glued laminated timber. Englewood (CO): American Institute of Timber Construction; 1998. p. 1–11.
6. Longitudinal glued laminated timber bridge modeling10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:4(1121) ↗
7. McCutcheon · 1973
8. McCutcheon · 1974
9. Davalos JF, Salim HA, Munipalle U. Glulam-GFRP composite beams for stress-laminated T-system timber bridges. In: Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Advanced Composite Materials in Bridges and Structures [CSCE-CGC], Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, 1992. p. 455–63.
10. Dagher HJ, Poulin J, Abdel-Magid B, Shaler SM, Tjoelker W, Yeh B. FRP reinforcement of Douglas fir and Western hemlock glulam beams. In: Proceedings of International Composites Expo '98, vol. 22C, Nashville, TN, 1998. p. 1–4.
11. Dagher HJ, Kimball T, Abdel-Magid B, Shaler SM. Effect of FRP reinforcement on low-grade eastern hemlock glulams. In: Proceedings of National Conference on Wood Transportation Structures, Madison, WI: Morgantown (WV): NWTIC; 1996.
12. Dagher HJ, Lindyberg R. FRP reinforced wood in bridge applications. In: Proceedings of 1st RILEM Symposium on Timber Engineering. Stockholm (Sweden): RILEM; 1999. p. 591–8.
13. Brody J, Richard A, Sebesta K, Wallace K, Hong Y, Lopez-Anido R, Davids W, Landis E. FRP-wood-concrete composite bridge girders. In: Proceedings of Structures Congress 2000—Advanced Technology in Structural Engineering. Philadelphia (PA): ASCE Press; 2000.10.1061/40492(2000)189 ↗
14. Structural characterization of hybrid FRP-glulam panels for bridge decks10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:3(194) ↗
15. Adhesive bonding of pultruded fiber-reinforced plastic to wood
16. Vick CB. Hydroxymethylated resorcinol coupling agent for enhanced adhesion of epoxy and other thermosetting adhesives to wood. In: Proceedings of Wood Adhesives—Proceedings no. 7296. Madision (WI): Forest Products Society; 1998. p. 47–55.
17. Sonti SS, GangaRao HVS, Talakanti DR. Accelerated aging of wood-composite members. In: Proceedings of 41st International SAMPE Symposium. Covina (CA): Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering; 1996. p. 1632–41.
18. Adhesive bonding of eastern hemlock glulam panels with E-glass/vinyl ester reinforcement
19. 1999
20. Compatibility of non-acidic waterborne preservatives with phenol-formaldehyde adhesive
21. Cure of phenol-formaldehyde adhesive in the presence of CCA-treated wood by differential scanning calorymetry
22. Vick CB. Preliminary findings on adhesive bonding of CCA-treated southern pine. In: Proceedings of Adhesive and Bonded Wood Products Symposium, 1994. p. 158–76.
23. The development of preservative treatment recommendations for red oak and red maple glued-laminated timber bridge members
24. Laminating creosote-treated hardwoods
25. Creosote treatment effect on hardwood glulam beam properties
26. Baileys RT, Webb DA, Blankenhorn PR, Janowiak JJ, Labosky P, Kessler KR, Kilmer WR, Manbeck HB, Schaffer KR. Hardwood glulam and creosote treatment—an evaluation of glue bond performance and structural strength characteristics. In: Proceedings of American Wood Preservers Association. Granbury (TX): AWPA; 1994. p. 1–8.
27. Characteristics of creosote treated LVL materials
28. Shaffer · 1991
29. 1999
30. Selbo ML. Summary of information on gluing of treated wood [report no. 1959]. Madison (WI): Forest Products Laboratory [USDA-FPL report no. 1789].
31. ASTM. ASTM D2559-99 standard specification for adhesives for structural laminated wood products for use under exterior (wet use) exposure conditions. In: Annual book of ASTM standards. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society of Testing and Materials; 2000. p. 167–72.
32. 2000
33. Mechanical interlocking of adhesive bonds to CCA-treated southern pine—a scanning electron microscopy study
34. Gluing of wood pressure-treated with water-borne preservatives and flame retardants
35. Fiber-reinforced composite and wood bonded interface, part 1. Durability and shear strength10.1520/CTR10544J ↗
36. Fiber-reinforced composite and wood bonded interface, part 2. Fracture10.1520/CTR10545J ↗
37. Strength properties of exterior adhesives on preservative treated hardwoods
38. Performance of stress-laminated bridges
39. Effects of preservative Treatment on bar force in stress-laminated bridge decks
40. Evaluation of method for testing adhesive—preservative compatibility
41. Evaluation of three adhesive systems for CCA-treated lumber
42. Kajander R. Personal communication. Toledo (OH): Johns Manville Corp.; 2002.
43. Tascioglu C, Goodell B, Lopez-Anido R. Effects of wood preservative treatments on mechanical properties of E-glass/phenolic pultruded reinforcement for wood. Forest Products Journal [in-press].
44. Alexander, JP, Shaler SM, Gardner DJ. Evaluating wood/FRP adhesive bond durability through chemical kinetics. In: Proceedings of Wood Adhesives 2000, Lake Tahoe, NV, 2000. p. 58–60.
45. Gamache C. Preliminary investigation on the durability of FRP reinforced glulam bridge girders. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. 2001, University of Maine, Orono, ME.
46. Coupling agent improves durability of PRF bonds to CCA treated southern pine
47. Bauccio · 1994
48. Mechanisms of chemical attack, corrosion resistance, and failure of plastic materials