Falling weight impact response of jute/methacrylated soybean oil bio-composites under low velocity impact loading
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, impact performance of bio-composites fabricated from jute/methacrylated soybean oil (MSO) subjected to low-velocity impact loading is presented. The composite laminates were fabricated using compression moulding technique and their thickness and weave architectures effect on the impact response were investigated and the experimental observations are reported. From the results obtained, it was observed that fibre orientation and thickness variation have a significant influence on the impact resistance of jute/MSO composite material. The results show that the total absorbed energy and maximum peak load increase linearly with an increase in the thickness. Among the composite samples investigated where thickness comprised of: 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 and 3 mm, a composite reinforced with 46 yarns per 10 cm weft and 50 warp (W2-3 mm thick) is found to have highest resistance to impact damage compared to 32 and 15 yarn per 10 cm weft samples. This was attributed to the improved fibre/matrix interface as a result of surface treatment of jute fibres and the fibre architectures effect which create the cross-over points which act as stress distributors.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. The potential of plant fibres as crops for industrial use10.1177/003072709502400204 ↗
2. Composites reinforced with cellulose base fibres10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5 ↗
3. Mechanical and viscoelastic properties of soybean oil thermoset reinforced with jute fabrics and carded lyocell fiber10.1002/app.34360 ↗
4. Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of hemp fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.019 ↗
5. Creep behaviour of hemp fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites10.1166/jbmb.2009.1028 ↗
6. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibres: 2000–201010.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
7. Impact properties of natural fibre reinforced epoxy foams10.1177/0021955X9903500605 ↗
8. The low velocity impact response of non-woven hemp fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.10.003 ↗
9. Post-impact static and cyclic flexural characterisation of Hemp fibre reinforced laminates10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.09.012 ↗
10. Low-velocity impact response of non-woven hemp fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites: Influence of impactor geometry and impact velocity10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.04.004 ↗
11. A comparative study on falling weight impact properties of jute/epoxy and hemp/epoxy laminates
12. Impact damage of carbon fibre polymer–matrix composites, studied by electrical resistance measurement10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.005 ↗
13. Low velocity response of a complex geometry pultruded glass/polyester composite10.1023/A:1004564516181 ↗
14. Review of the low velocity impact properties of composites materials10.1016/1359-835X(96)00074-7 ↗
15. The impact resistance of composite materials; a review10.1016/0010-4361(91)90549-V ↗
16. The influence of impactor shape on the damage to composites laminates10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.017 ↗
17. Mechanical properties of sisal/oil palm hybrid fibre reinforced natural rubber composites10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00261-6 ↗
18. Effect of corona discharge and UV treatment on the properties of jute-fiber epoxy composites10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00168-8 ↗
19. Effect of moisture content on mechanical properties, thermal and structural stability and extrudate texture of poly(vinyl chloride)/wood sawdust composites10.1002/pi.1535 ↗
20. Influence of fibre treatment and glass fibre hybridisation on thermal degradation and surface energy characteristics of hemp/unsaturated polyester composites10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.036 ↗
21. Abaca fibre reinforced PP composites and comparison with jute and flax fibre PP composites10.3144/expresspolymlett.2007.104 ↗
22. Instrumented performation impact response of polypropylene composites with hybrid reinfrocement flax/glass and flax/cellulose fibres10.1106/7PQW-D06A-MYU6-8692 ↗
23. Falling weight impact damage characterisation on flax/epoxy laminates10.1504/IJMPT.2009.027833 ↗
24. Impact and flexural properties of flax fabrics and lyocell fiber-reinforced bio-based thermoset10.1177/0731684411405874 ↗
25. Biobased composites prepared by compression molding with a novel thermoset resin from soybean oil and a natural-fiber reinforcement10.1002/app.31634 ↗
26. The response of composite structures with pre-stress subject to low velocity impact damage10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.06.015 ↗
27. Post-impact damage characterization of hybrid configurations of jute/glass polyester laminates using acoustic emission and IR thermography10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.011 ↗
28. Geometrical Effects in the low velocity impact response of GFRP10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.015 ↗
29. Mcwilliams A. Advanced materials, light weight materials in transportation. Report, 2007. Report code: AVM056A.
30. Textile fibre composites and their applications
31. Natural fibre composites in automotive applications
32. A review of bast fibres and their composites. Part I – fibres as reinforcements10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.06.001 ↗