Neural network approach for damaged area location prediction of a composite plate using electromechanical impedance technique
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Nowadays, breakthrough composite technologies are intensifying the complexity of structural components every day and assuring the structural integrity is becoming more essential, thus creating challenges for developing a cost effective and reliable non-destructive evaluation (NDE) technique. As conventional NDE techniques usually require expensive equipments, trained experts and out-of-service period, such techniques may be inadequate for autonomous online health monitoring of structures. In this study, a relatively new technique known as electromechanical impedance (EMI) technique is combined with a neural network technique to predict the damaged areas on a composite plate. Regardless of the advantages such as low cost, robustness, simplicity and online possibilities, this technique still has various problems to be solved. For one, locating a damaged area can be extremely difficult as this non-model based technique heavily relies on the variations in the impedance signatures. The results show that the non-homogenous property is an advantage for the study, successfully identifying the damage location for the prepared test specimen with an acceptable performance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Overview of piezoelectric impedance-based health monitoring and path forward10.1177/05831024030356001 ↗
2. Review of NDT methods in the assessment of concrete and masonry structures10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00032-3 ↗
3. Advanced nanoscale characterization of cement based materials using X-ray synchrotron radiation: a review10.1007/s40069-013-0036-1 ↗
4. Resonant frequency range utilized electro-mechanical impedance method for damage detection performance enhancement on composite structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.02.022 ↗
5. Feasibility of using impedance based damage assessment for pipeline systems10.1002/eqe.72 ↗
6. Steel wire electromechanical impedance method using a piezoelectric material for composite structures with complex surfaces10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.10.046 ↗
7. A technique for improving the damage detection ability of electro-mechanical impedance method on concrete structures10.1088/0964-1726/21/8/085024 ↗
8. A low-cost variant of electro-mechanical impedance (EMI) technique for structural health monitoring10.1111/j.1747-1567.2009.00524.x ↗
9. Electro-mechanical impedance method of fiber–reinforced plastic adhesive joints in corrosive environment using a reusable piezoelectric device10.1177/1045389X12440754 ↗
10. Coupled electro-mechanical analysis of adaptive material system-determination of the actuator power consumption and system energy transfer10.1177/1045389X9400500102 ↗
11. Lopes Jr V, Pereira JA, Weber HI. Using a model updating technique to train neural networking for fault detection. In: 16th Biennial conference on mechanics vib. and noise-symposium on system health monitoring, in CD-ROM 1997. ASME conference, September.10.1115/DETC97/VIB-4233 ↗
12. Integration of electro-mechanical impedance and global dynamic technique for improved structural health monitoring10.1177/1045389X09356609 ↗
13. Impedance-based structural health monitoring incorporating neural network technique for identification of damage type and severity10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.01.012 ↗
14. Impedance-based structural health monitoring with artificial neural networks10.1106/H0EV-7PWM-QYHW-E7VF ↗
15. A damage classification technique for impedance based health monitoring of helicopter blades10.1117/12.776751 ↗
16. Analog devices. AD5933 evaluation board. [accessed on 18.07.13]. .
17. Piezo systems, Inc. PSI-5A4E piezoceramic sheets. [accessed on 18.07.13]. .
18. Truss structure integrity identification using PZT sensor–actuator10.1177/1045389X9500600117 ↗
19. Hankuk carbon Co. Ltd. [accessed on 18.07.13]. .
20. Probabilistic neural networks10.1016/0893-6080(90)90049-Q ↗