Evaluation of failure prediction in composite laminates: background to ‘part C’ of the exercise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Smart Materials for Construction · Textile materials and evaluations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Failure of polymeric composite structures: mechanisms and criteria for prediction of performance. SERC/I.Mech.E Annual expert meeting, 23–25 September 1991, Sopwell House, St. Albans, UK. [A report compiled by C E Neal-Sturgress].
2. Predicting failure in composite laminates: the background to the exercise10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00074-8 ↗
3. Lamina properties and lay-up configurations and loading conditions of a range fibre reinforced composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00078-5 ↗
4. Prediction of composite laminate fracture: micromechanics and progressive fracture10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00014-6 ↗
5. Failure criteria for use in the design environment10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00144-3 ↗
6. Stress based Grant–Sanders method for predicting failure of composite laminates
7. Predicting transverse crack formation in cross-ply laminate10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00142-X ↗
8. Predictions of the original and truncated maximum strain failure models for certain fibrous composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00192-9 ↗
9. Predictions of a generalised maximum-shear-stress failure criterion for certain fibrous composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00193-0 ↗
10. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00140-6 ↗
11. Prediction of laminate failure with Rotem failure criterion10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00143-1 ↗
12. Prediction of failure envelopes and stress strain behaviours of composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00013-4 ↗
13. A progressive quadratic failure criterion of a laminate10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00141-8 ↗
14. A strain energy based failure criterion for nonlinear analysis of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loading10.1016/S0266-3538(96)00145-5 ↗
15. Strength of multilayered composites under plane stress state10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00191-7 ↗
16. Comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00077-3 ↗
17. Evaluation of failure prediction in composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00094-5 ↗
18. Experimental failure stresses and deformations for a range of composite laminates subjected to uniaxial and biaxial loads10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00093-3 ↗
19. Expanding the capabilities of the ten-percent rule for predicting the strength of fibre–polymer composites10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00092-1 ↗
20. Application of progressive fracture analysis for predicting failure envelopes and stress–strain behaviors of composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00095-7 ↗
21. Failure criteria for use in the design environment—Part B10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00206-8 ↗
22. Theory vs experiment comparison for stress based Grant-Sanders method10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00209-3 ↗
23. Comparison between theories and test data concerning the strength of various fibre–polymer composites10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00212-3 ↗
24. Predicting ply crack formation and failure in laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00204-4 ↗
25. Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models—Part B
26. The Rotem failure criterion theory and practice10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00210-X ↗
27. Prediction of failure envelopes and stress–strain behavior of composite laminates
28. A progressive quadratic failure criterion, Part B
29. Strain energy based non-linear failure criterion
30. Tairova, Coupled analysis of experimental and theoretical results on the deformation and failure of laminated composites under a plane state of stress
31. A comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates, judged against experimental evidence10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00125-2 ↗
32. Bogetti TA, Hoppel CPR, Harik VM, Newill JF, Burns BP. Predicting the nonlinear response and progressive failure of composite laminates [in this issue].
33. Cuntze RG, Freund A. The predictive capability of Failure Mode Concept-based strength criteria for multidirectional laminates [in this issue].
34. Mayes SJ, Hansen AC. Composite laminate failure analysis using multicontinuum Theory [in this issue].
35. Zheng Ming Huang. A bridging model prediction of the tensile strength of composite laminates subjected to biaxial loads [in this issue].
36. Bogetti TA, Hoppel CPR, Harik VM, Newill JF, Burns BP. Predicting the nonlinear response and failure of composite laminates: correlation with experimental results [in this issue].
37. Cuntze RG. The predictive capability of failure mode concept- based strength criteria for multidirectional laminates: Part B. [in this issue].
38. Mayes SJ, Hansen AC. A comparison of multicontinuum theory based failure simulation with experimental results [in this issue].
39. Zheng Ming Huang. Correlation of the bridging model predictions of the biaxial failure strengths of fibrous laminates with experiments [in this issue].
40. Kaddour AS, Hinton MJ, Soden, PD. Comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: additional contributions [to be published in this issue].
41. Hinton MJ, Soden PD, Kaddour AS. A further assessment of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates: comparison with experimental evidence [in this issue].
42. Soden PD, Hinton MJ, Kaddour AS. Recommendations for designers and researchers resulting from the World-Wide Failure Exercise [in this issue].