Split Hopkinson pressure bar testing of 3D woven composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Results from a series of split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests on 3D woven tetxile composites (3DWC) are presented. These tests were done to determine the rate dependent compression response of 3DWC. Three different configurations of the 3DWC, corresponding to compression response in the plane of the material and through-the-thickness direction (out-of-plane) were studied. The rate dependent responses were compared against quasi-static test results and it was found that 3DWC showed an increase in strength in all three directions studied, however, accompanied by a transition in the failure mechanism. The in-plane orientations showed the largest increase in (about 100%) strength at the elevated rates of loading. A follow-on paper provides finite element based results that correspond to the experimental results presented here.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Energetic Materials and Combustion · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Compressive stability of delaminated random short-fiber composites, part ii-experimental and analytical results10.1177/002199838501900402 ↗
2. Stobbe D, Mohamed M. 3d woven composites: cost and performance viabiliity in comercial applications. in: 48th international SAMPE symposium, SAMPE; 2003.
3. A 3-d micromechanical model for predicting the elastic behaviour of woven laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.12.019 ↗
4. Garry III GT, ASM handbooks online. vol. 8, ASM International; 2004. [1985, Ch. High Strain Rate Testing].
5. Specimen size and shape effect in split Hopkinson pressure bar testing10.1243/03093247JSA538 ↗
6. Quasi-static and dynamic compressive behaviors of a s-2 glass/sc15 composite10.1177/002199803035189 ↗
7. Use of split Hopkinson pressure bar for testing off-axis composites10.1016/S0734-743X(00)00039-7 ↗
8. Compressive behavior of multi-axial multi-layer warp knitted (mmwk) fabric composite and various strain rates10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.08.011 ↗
9. High strain rate behavior of 4-step 3d braided composites under compressive failure10.1007/s10853-006-1295-x ↗
10. Influence of the strain rate on the uniaxial tensile behavior of 4-step 3d braided composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.012 ↗
11. Shear behavior of 3d orthogonal woven fabric composites under high strain rates10.1177/0731684406068452 ↗
12. Pankow M, Waas A, Yen C, Ghiorse S. Modeling of 3d woven composites under dynamic loading conditions, University of Michigan, Aerospace Engineering Report; 2011.
13. Gama B, Lopatnikov SK, Gillespie Jr J. Hopkinson bar experimental technique: a critical review. Appl Mech Rev 2004;57(4);223–50.10.1115/1.1704626 ↗
14. Song X. Vacuum assisted resin transfer modling (vartm): Model development and verification. Ph.d. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; April 2003.
15. Flow modeling and simulation for vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process with the equivalent premeability method10.1002/pc.20012 ↗
16. Fabrication and characterization of montmorillonite clay-filled sc-15 epoxy10.1016/j.matlet.2005.10.042 ↗
17. Shock loading of 3d woven composites: a validated finite element investigation10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.11.001 ↗
18. A non-dimensional number to classify composite compressive failure10.1115/1.1756923 ↗
19. Song et al. Compression response strength and post-peak response of an axial fiber reinforced tow. Int J Mech Sci 2009;51(7):491–9.10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.03.008 ↗
20. Pankow M. The deformation response of 3d woven composites subjected to high rates of loading. Ph.d. dissertation, The University of Michigan; May 2010.