Failure mechanisms in bioinspired helicoidal laminates
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Previous research has shown that stacking unidirectional laminates helicoidally with small interply angles resulted in improvements in transverse load resistance. Guided by computational simulations, damage evolution within helicoidal and cross-ply laminates was tracked with further experiments to offer an insight into key differences responsible for their distinct load bearing characteristics. Under transverse loads, the first form of damage is delamination. Unlike cross-plys, which suffer multiple delamination of about the same size throughout the thickness, delamination is harder to initiate in helicoidal laminates due to the small angle between each ply. A large delamination eventually formed at the mid-plane. Transverse cracks then appear on the tensile surface of both types of specimens and propagate upwards with increasing loads. Load drops occur whenever the transverse cracks propagate to the delamination immediately above them. In the case of cross-plys, where there are multiple delamination, multiple load drops occur. Load drops in helicoidal laminates are delayed until the cracks reach the large delamination in the mid-plane. Helicoidal specimens do not experience multiple loads drops and can attain high peak load before catastrophic failure. It is shown that even higher peak load is achieved by selectively seeding delamination in helicoidal laminates to further delay the merging of transverse cracks with the dominant delamination.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (16)
Show source-provided references
1. Sur une architecture torsadée répandue dans de nombreuses cuticules d'Arthropodes
2. Crustacean-inspired helicoidal laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.04.007 ↗
3. Helicoidal composites10.1080/15376490500343808 ↗
4. Mechanical behavior of bioinspired laminated composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.11.009 ↗
5. On the relationship between impact energy and delamination area10.1007/BF02321362 ↗
6. Dependence of fracture toughness of composite laminates on interface ply orientations and delamination growth direction
7. Ravi-Chandar · 2011
8. Model and maximal pull-out force of helicoidal fiber structure in the underpinnings of tumblebug cuticle10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.686.427 ↗
9. An engineering solution for mesh size effects in the simulation of delamination using cohesive zone models10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.08.025 ↗
10. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials10.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
11. Camanho · 2002
12. Physically based failure models and criteria for laminated fibre-reinforced composites with emphasis on fibre kinking. Part II: FE implementation10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.008 ↗
13. Influence of fiber direction and mixed-mode ratio on delamination fracture toughness of carbon/epoxy laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00258-0 ↗
14. Damage resistance and damage tolerance of dispersed CFRP laminates: effect of the mismatch angle between plies10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.026 ↗
15. Impact-induced delamination—a view of bending stiffness mismatching10.1177/002199838802200706 ↗
16. Mechanisms governing the damage resistance of laminated composites subjected to low-velocity impacts10.1177/105678959400300406 ↗