journal article·2014-04

Fatigue of hybrid glass/carbon composites: 3D computational studies

Gaoming Dai, Leon Mishnaevsky

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract 3D computational simulations of fatigue of hybrid carbon/glass fiber reinforced composites is carried out using X-FEM and multifiber unit cell models. A new software code for the automatic generation of unit cell multifiber models of composites with randomly misaligned fibers of various properties and geometrical parameters is developed. With the use of this program code and the X-FEM method, systematic investigations of the effect of microstructure of hybrid composites (fraction of carbon versus glass fibers, misalignment, and interface strength) and the loading conditions (tensile versus compression cyclic loading effects) on fatigue behavior of the materials are carried out. It was demonstrated that the higher fraction of carbon fibers in hybrid composites is beneficial for the fatigue lifetime of the composites under tension–tension cyclic loading, but might have negative effect on the lifetime under compression-compression, and has mixed effect for the tension–compression cyclic loading. Further, it was observed that while the fiber misalignment has some potential for increasing the fracture toughness of the hybrid composites, it speeds up the fiber damage and leads to the shortening of fatigue life.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Materials of large wind turbine blades: recent results in testing and modelling10.1002/we.470 ↗
2. Carbon fiber and glass fiber hybrid reinforced plastics10.1016/0010-4361(78)90341-5 ↗
3. Composite materials for wind energy applications: micromechanical modelling and future directions10.1007/s00466-012-0727-5 ↗
4. Ong CH, Tsai SW. The use of carbon fibers in wind turbine blade design: A SERI-8 Blade Example SAND2000-0478, Sandia National Laboratories Contractor Report; 2000.10.2172/752054 ↗
5. Static and dynamic fatigue of glass–carbon hybrid composites in fluid environment10.1177/0021998302036002555 ↗
6. Environmental fatigue of unidirectional glass–carbon fiber reinforced hybrid composite10.1016/S1359-8368(01)00014-2 ↗
7. Micromechanics modeling of fatigue failure mechanisms in a hybrid polymer matrix composite10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.07.017 ↗
8. Tensile fatigue behaviour of FRP and hybrid FRP sheets10.1016/j.compositesb.2010.02.001 ↗
9. Redon O. Fatigue damage development and failure in unidirectional and angle-ply glass fibre/carbon fibre hybrid laminates. Risø, Report 2000; Risø-R-1168 (EN).
10. Bach PW. Fatigue properties of glass- and glass/carbon-polyester composites for wind turbines. Netherlands Energy Research Foundation, Report 1992; ecn-c–92-o72.
11. Bortolotti P. Carbon glass hybrid materials for wind turbine rotor blades. Master Thesis Delft University of Technology; 2012.
12. Three-dimensional numerical modelling of damage initiation in UD fiber-reinforced composites with ductile matrix10.1016/j.msea.2007.09.105 ↗
13. Functionally gradient metal matrix composites: numerical analysis of the microstructure–strength relationships10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.09.003 ↗
14. Single fibre and multifibre unit cell analysis of strength and cracking of unidirectional composites10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.04.024 ↗
15. Nanoreinforced polymer composites: 3D FEM modeling with effective interface concept10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.03.003 ↗
16. Modeling of nano-reinforced polymer composites: Microstructure effect on Young’s modulus10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.03.010 ↗
17. Hybrid carbon and glass fiber composites10.1016/0010-4361(74)90107-4 ↗
18. Damage evolution in nanoclay-reinforced polymers: a three-dimensional computational study10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.10.003 ↗
19. Fatigue of multiscale composites with secondary nanoplatelet reinforcement: 3D computational analysis10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.11.024 ↗
20. Development of a benchmark example for delamination fatigue growth prediction
21. A review of extended/generalized finite element methods for material modeling10.1088/0965-0393/17/4/043001 ↗
22. Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
23. Modelling crack growth by level sets in the extended finite element method10.1002/nme.201 ↗
24. Extended finite element method for three-dimensional crack modeling10.1002/1097-0207(20000820)48:11<1549::AID-NME955>3.0.CO;2-A ↗
25. A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral10.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3 ↗
26. Computational modeling of crack propagation in real microstructures of steels and virtual testing of materials10.1023/A:1025524214322 ↗
27. Virtual crack closure technique: history, approach and applications10.1115/1.1595677 ↗
28. Micromechanical modeling of damage and fracture of unidirectional fiber reinforced composites: a review10.1016/j.commatsci.2008.09.004 ↗
29. Hybrid carbon/glass fiber composites: Micromechanical analysis of structure–damage resistance relationships10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.024 ↗
30. Statistical modelling of compression and fatigue damage of unidirectional fiber reinforced composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.11.024 ↗
31. Mandell JF, Samborsky. DOE/MSU Composite Material Fatigue Database: Test Methods, Materials, and Analysis. Report SAND97-3002, Sandia, Albuquerque (NM); 1997.10.2172/578635 ↗
32. Unidirectional high fiber content composites: automatic 3D FE model generation and damage simulation10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.09.023 ↗
33. Computational modeling of crack propagation in real microstructures of steels and virtual testing of artificially designed materials10.1023/A:1025524214322 ↗
34. Reeder JR. 3D Mixed-mode delamination fracture criteria-an experimentalist’s perspective. NASA Langley Research Center, M/S 188E, Hampton VA 23681–2199, USA.
35. The determination of mode III fracture toughness in thick composite laminates10.1016/0266-3538(96)00009-7 ↗
36. Reeder JR. A bilinear failure criterion for mixed-mode delamination. In: Camponeschi, Jr., editor. Composite Materials: Testing and design, ASTM STP 1206. W. Conshohochen (PA): ASTM Int.; p. 303–22.10.1520/STP12636S ↗
37. Fracture toughness of the tensile and compressive fiber failure modes in laminated composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.023 ↗
38. Intralaminar fracture toughness of cross-ply laminate and its constituent sub-laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00011-2 ↗
39. Tensile strength of glass fibers with carbon nanotube-epoxy nanocomposites coating10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.07.005 ↗
40. Properties of the interphase in organic matrix composites10.1016/0921-5093(90)90137-R ↗
41. The hybrid effect-does it exist?10.1016/0010-4361(76)90273-1 ↗
42. Compressive failure of fiber composites10.1016/0022-5096(93)90068-Q ↗
43. Leon Mishnaevsky Jr., Compressive damage mechanism of GFRP composites under off-axis loading: Experimental and numerical investigations10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.06.007 ↗
44. Hahn HT, Williams JG. Compression failure mechanisms in unidirectional composites. Composite Materials: Testing and Design, ASTM STP 893, Whitney JM, editor, Philadelphia; 1986. p. 115–39.10.1520/STP35345S ↗