journal article·2006-10Open access

Probabilistic strength prediction for double lap joints composed of pultruded GFRP profiles – Part II: Strength prediction

Till Vallée, João R. Correia, Thomas Keller

Composites Science and Technology· Volume 66· Issue 13

Abstract

A probabilistic method for the strength prediction of adhesively bonded double lap joints composed of pultruded GFRP adherends subjected to quasi-static axial tensile loading is presented. The prediction method is based on the experimentally determined material strength of joint materials and its statistical distribution. It takes into consideration the scale sensitivity of the strength, which is modelled using Weibull statistics, and considers not only the magnitude of the stress fields, but also the volume over which stress peaks act. The method therefore presents a mechanical explanation for the increased resistance of local material zones against high strain or stress peaks, which would normally cause failure of bulk material. The predicted joint strengths are slightly underestimated compared to the experimental results due to inaccurate upper tail modeling of the material strength by the Weibull statistical distribution. A comparison of strength results with corresponding results from a maximum stress based failure criterion confirms a statistical size effect with respect to the strength in the order of 10-25%. The probabilistic method provides reasonable results for brittle joint failure, but it cannot be used to predict joint strength of quasi-brittle or pseudo-ductile joint failures, which showed minor statistical scale sensitivity. [All rights reserved Elsevier]
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Vallée T, Correia JR, Keller T. Probabilistic strength prediction for double lap joints composed of GFRP profiles, Part I: experimental and numerical investigations. Compos Sci Technol, in press, doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.04.007.10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.04.007 ↗
2. 1996
3. ASTM D 5573. Standard Practice for Classifying Failure Modes in Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Joints, June 1999.
4. Failure load prediction of structural adhesive joints: Part 1: Analytical method10.1016/0143-7496(91)90003-Z ↗
5. Failure load prediction of structural adhesive joints: Part 2: Experimental study10.1016/0143-7496(91)90004-2 ↗
6. Fracture load predictions for adhesive joints10.1016/0266-3538(94)90091-4 ↗
7. The sensitivity of a Weibull failure criterion to singularity strength and local geometry variations10.1016/S0143-7496(98)00058-X ↗
8. Adhesively bonded lap joints from pultruded GFRP profiles, Part I: stress–strain analysis and failure modes10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.11.001 ↗
9. Adhesively bonded lap joints from pultruded GFRP profiles, Part II: joint strength prediction10.1016/j.compositesb.2004.11.002 ↗
10. Strength prediction of bonded single lap joints by non-linear finite element methods10.1016/0143-7496(84)90103-9 ↗
11. Non-linear adhesive bonded joint design analyses10.1016/0143-7496(90)90025-S ↗
12. Analysing structural adhesive joints for failure10.1016/0143-7496(90)90100-C ↗
13. Global yielding as a failure criterion for bonded joints10.1016/0143-7496(89)90110-3 ↗
14. The influence of local geometry on the strength of adhesive joints10.1016/0143-7496(87)90092-3 ↗
15. A unified approach for predicting the strength of cracked and non-cracked adhesive joints10.1080/00218469508014357 ↗
16. Ultimate tensile stress over a zone: A new failure criterion for adhesive joints10.1080/00218469308026578 ↗
17. Predictions of the original and truncated maximum-strain failure models for certain fibrous composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00192-9 ↗
18. Expanding the capabilities of the Ten-Percent Rule for predicting the strength of fibre-polymer composites10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00092-1 ↗
19. Predictions of a generalized maximum-shear-stress failure criterion for certain fibrous composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00193-0 ↗
20. A general theory of strength for anisotropic materials10.1177/002199837100500106 ↗
21. Puck · 1996
22. Bažant · 2005
23. Leonardo Da Vinci. Notebooks of Leonardo Da Vinci, Edward McCurdy, London, 546; and Les Manuscrits de Léonard de Vinci [French translation by Ravaisson-Mollien C., vol. 3, Inst de France (1981–91)], 1500s.
24. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids10.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
25. Karmarsch K, Mitteilungen der höheren Gewerbeschule in Hannover, 1858. p. 138–55.
26. Tensile tests for cotton yarns
27. The statistical theory of the strength of bundles of threads10.1098/rspa.1945.0011 ↗
28. Scaling of structural failure10.1115/1.3101672 ↗
29. Über die Fließgrenzen bei Zug- und Biegebeanspruchung
30. A statistical distribution function of wide application10.1115/1.4010337 ↗
31. Three-parameter vs. two-parameter Weibull distribution for pultruded composite material properties10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00158-7 ↗
32. Lawless · 1982
33. Rust SW, Todt FR, Harris B, Neal D, Vangel M. Statistical methods for calculating material allowable for MIL-HDBK-17. In: Test methods for design allowable for fibrous composites. ASTM STP 1003, 1989. p. 136–49.10.1520/STP10024S ↗
34. Technology in the 1990s: The promise of advanced materials
35. A new statistical distribution function for fracture toughness10.1098/rspa.1987.0047 ↗
36. Metcalfe AG, Schmitz GK. Effect of length on the strength of glass fibers. American Society for Testing Materials 1964, Preprint 87.
37. The dependence of the strength of carbon fibres on length10.1016/0015-0568(79)90032-0 ↗
38. Specimen size effect during tensile testing of an unreinforced polymer10.1007/BF01107202 ↗
39. Tensile, bending and shear strength distributions of adhesive-bonded butt joint specimens10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.013 ↗
40. Size effects in the testing of fibre-composite materials10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00053-6 ↗
41. Size and scale effects in composites: I. Literature review10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00065-7 ↗
42. Strength ratios of composite materials in flexure and tension10.1177/002199837400800209 ↗
43. The effect of specimen size on the strength of CFRP10.1016/0010-4361(78)90590-6 ↗
44. The effect of specimen size on the bending strength of unidirectional carbon-fibre-epoxy10.1016/0263-8223(91)90013-O ↗
45. Relationship between strength variability and size effect in unidirectional carbon fibre/epoxy10.1016/0010-4361(91)90102-M ↗
46. Characterization of thick glass woven roving/polyester laminates: 1. Tension, compression and shear10.1016/0010-4361(95)92622-J ↗
47. Characterization of thick glass woven roving/polyester laminates: 2. Flexure and statistical considerations10.1016/0010-4361(95)92623-K ↗
48. Size effect and fracture characteristics of composite laminates10.1115/1.2806812 ↗
49. Size effect in blunt fracture: concrete, rock and metal10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1984)110:4(518) ↗
50. Scaling laws in mechanics of failure10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1993)119:9(1828) ↗
51. Reduction in tensile and flexural strength of unidirectional glass fibre-epoxy with increasing specimen size10.1016/S0263-8223(97)00075-5 ↗
52. Apparent strength scaling in continuous fiber composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00124-4 ↗
53. Is there a size effect in composites?10.1016/0010-4361(94)90102-3 ↗