A comparison of multicontinuum theory based failure simulation with experimental results
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper is part of a broader exercise to determine the predictive capability of several currently accepted composite failure criteria. Blind failure and stress–strain predictions were originally submitted by us to the organizers of the exercise for 14 different cases involving four different composite materials. A finite element based analysis was used to simulate progressive failure of the various composite laminates under uniaxial and multiaxial loading. Under the assumption of the composite acting as a multicontinuum, fiber and matrix constituent stress and strain states were derived. This information formed the input to a quadratic, stress-interactive constituent-based failure criteria to predict damage at the composite level. Two-dimensional failure envelopes and stress–strain curves for the composite were developed. In what follows, the experimental results have been made available to us for comparison against our analytical failure simulations. Generally, these analytical predictions were in good agreement with experimental results. The presence of simultaneous normal and shear stresses in a composite laminate was found to significantly enhance shear strength which was not accounted for in the proposed failure criteria.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (10)
Show source-provided references
1. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites10.1115/1.3153664 ↗
2. An invariant-based flow rule for anisotropic plasticity applied to composite materials10.1115/1.2897701 ↗
3. Mayes JS, Hansen AC. Composite laminate failure analysis using multicontinuum theory, Comp Sci Technol [in press].10.1016/B978-008044475-8/50019-6 ↗
4. Mayes JS. Micromechanics based failure analysis of composite structural laminates. Naval Surface Warfare Center, Carderock Division Report, NSWCCD-65-TR–1999/15, September 1999.
5. Lamina properties, lay-up configurations and loading conditions for a range of fibre-reinforced composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00078-5 ↗
6. Herakovich CT. Laminate failures. In Mechanics of fibrous composites. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
7. Experimental failure stresses and deformations for a range of composite laminates subjected to uniaxial and biaxial loads: Failure exercise benchmark data10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00093-3 ↗
8. Hyer · 1998
9. Welsh JS, Adams DF. Unidirectional composite compression strengths obtained by testing mini-sandwich, angle-, and cross-ply laminates. Composite Materials Research Group Report No. UW-CMRG-R-95-106, Laramie, WY, April 1995.
10. A further comparison of the predictive capabilities of current failure theories for composite laminates, judged against experimental evidence