Effects of defects on interlaminar tensile fatigue behavior of carbon/epoxy composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This work presents a methodology for accurate assessment of the effects of porosity defects on the interlaminar tensile (ILT) fatigue behavior of carbon/epoxy tape composites that can be used in aircraft fatigue-critical structural designs. A primary failure mechanism for such structures is delamination. The ILT fatigue material properties may be helpful for the development of the analysis methods able to predict initiation of delamination at sites that give rise to interlaminar stresses and where a fracture based approach may be more applicable [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] . However, the engineering community lacks reliable ILT fatigue data available in the public domain. A major technical challenge is extreme sensitivity of ILT properties to manufacturing defects including porosity that could lead to unacceptable scatter in the test results. In this work, X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) measurements of porosity defects present in curved-beam test specimens are integrated into finite element stress analysis to capture the effects of defects on the ILT fatigue behavior. Once the effects of manufacturing defects are captured through transfer of the CT measurements into a three-dimensional finite element model, the scatter in the curved-beam fatigue test data is reduced; and material ILT fatigue properties can be determined. In this work, CT and finite element modeling are used to determine a reliable ILT S–N curve for a popular IM7/8552 carbon/epoxy tape composite system at 0.1 load ratio.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Fracture mechanics of composite delaminations
2. Fatigue life methodology for bonded composite skin/stringer configurations10.4050/JAHS.43.146 ↗
3. Fatigue life methodology for bonded composite skin/stringer configurations10.1520/CTR10561J ↗
4. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard test method for mode I. Fatigue delamination growth onset of unidirectional fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composites. ASTM Standard D 6115–97, ASTM International; 2009.
5. US Department of Defense, Military handbook – MIL-HDBK-17-1F: Composite materials handbook, Polymer Matrix composites guidelines for characterization of structural materials; 2002: vol. 1.
6. Helicopter applications and design
7. Nikishkov Y, Makeev A, Cline C, Beasley J, Fay R. Finite element-based damage tolerance methods for aircraft composites. In: Proceedings of the American helicopter society 67th forum. (Updated Cheeseman award paper of the 36th European rotorcraft forum, Paris, France, 2010); 2011.
8. Makeev · 2011
9. Progressive fatigue damage simulation method for composites10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.11.005 ↗
10. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard test method for measuring the curved beam strength of a fiber-reinforced polymer–matrix composite. ASTM Standard D 6415/D 6415M, ASTM International; 2006.
11. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard test method for through-thickness “flatwise” tensile strength and elastic modulus of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite material. ASTM Standard D 7291/D 7291M, ASTM International; 2007.
12. Damage prediction in cross-plied curved composite laminates
13. Static and fatigue interlaminar tensile characterization of laminated composites
14. A curved beam test specimen for determining the interlaminar tensile strength of a laminated composite10.1177/002199839102500705 ↗
15. Interlaminar shear fatigue behavior of glass/epoxy and carbon/epoxy composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2013.03.013 ↗
16. Lekhnitskii · 1968
17. The flexure of simply curved composite shapes10.1016/0010-4361(89)90911-7 ↗
18. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard test method for void content of reinforced plastics. ASTM Standard D 6415–94 (Reapproved 2003), ASTM International; 2006.
19. 3D damage characterization and the role of voids in the fatigue of wind turbine blade materials10.1016/j.compscitech.2011.11.023 ↗
20. Lopes CS, Remmers JJC, Gurdal Z. Influence of porosity on the interlaminar shear strength of fibre-metal laminates. Key Eng Mater 383: 35–52.10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.383.35 ↗
21. Makeev A, Nikishkov Y, Carpentier P, Lee E, Noel J. Manufacturing issues and measurement techniques for assessment of the effects on structural performance of composite parts. In: Proceedings of the AHS 66th annual forum. Phoenix, AZ, May; 2010.
22. Stress fracture criteria for laminated composites containing stress concentrations10.1177/002199837400800303 ↗
23. Stress concentration factors of a general triaxial ellipsoidal cavity10.1111/j.1460-2695.2008.01294.x ↗
24. Characterization of nonlinear shear properties for composite materials using digital image correlation and finite element analysis10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.09.010 ↗
25. Makeev A, Nikishkov Y, Seon G, Armanios E. Methods for assessing interlaminar tensile properties in composite materials. In: Proceedings of American Society for composites 28th technical conference; 2013.
26. A method for measurement of multiple constitutive properties for composite materials10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.07.021 ↗
27. American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard test method for short-beam strength of polymer matrix composite materials and their laminates. ASTM Standard D 2344/D 2344M, ASTM International; 2006.
28. Jackson WC, Martin RH. An interlaminar tensile strength specimen. In: Camponeschi Jr. ET editor Composite materials: testing and design. ASTM STP 1206, vol. 11, 1993. p. 333–54.