journal article·2015-09

Uncorrelated volume element for stochastic modeling of microstructures based on local fiber volume fraction variation

Seyed Hamid Reza Sanei, Ray S. Fertig

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract One source of microstructural variability in fiber reinforced polymers is variability in fiber volume fraction. Despite large scatter in fiber volume fraction, an average value is usually reported without any consideration regarding the variability. Significant variation in fiber volume fraction across the sample reveals that homogeneity throughout the sample is a poor assumption and the commonly employed representative volume element is a poor representation of real microstructures. In this work, the distributions of fiber volume fraction at different length scales are investigated. The variation in distributions suggests that a length scale-dependent distribution must be selected in probabilistic analysis. A cross-correlation between fiber volume fractions of nearest neighbors was computed and an uncorrelated volume element (UVE) is introduced for the length scale at which fiber volume fractions become uncorrelated. The concept of a UVE enables random attribution of properties in stochastic modeling.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Composite Material Mechanics · Mechanical Behavior of Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Effects of fiber arrangement on mechanical behavior of unidirectional composites10.1177/0021998308093910 ↗
2. Subsampling and homogenization to investigate variability of composite material mechanical properties10.1016/j.cma.2012.06.003 ↗
3. Random fiber micromechanics of fatigue damage
4. Influence of non-uniform fiber arrangement on microscopic stress and failure initiation in thermally and transversely loaded CF/epoxy laminated composites10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.07.006 ↗
5. Effect of fiber array irregularities on microscopic interfacial normal stress states of transversely loaded UD-CFRP from viewpoint of failure initiation10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.08.032 ↗
6. Curtis · 1988
7. Fibre volume fraction determination of carbon-epoxy composites using an acid digestion bomb10.1007/BF00744114 ↗
8. Influence of the processing parameters on glass mat reinforced thermoplastic (GMT) stamping10.1016/0956-7143(92)90183-U ↗
9. Determination of the microtexture of reinforced thermoplastics by image analysis10.1016/S0266-3538(97)00125-5 ↗
10. Determination of Fiber Volume Fractions by Optical Numeric Volume Fraction Analysis10.1177/073168448900800605 ↗
11. Characterization of fiber volume fraction gradients in composite laminates10.1177/0021998307086206 ↗
12. Quantitative image processing analysis of composite materials10.1002/pc.750150108 ↗
13. Statistical approach of elastic properties of continuous fiber composite10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.08.039 ↗
14. Effect of material variability on multiscale modeling of rate-dependent composite materials10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000488 ↗
15. Johnston · 2015 · 1
16. Reliability analysis—a review and some perspectives10.1016/S0167-4730(02)00009-7 ↗
17. Reliability in composites – a selective review and survey of current development10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.10.007 ↗
18. Ultimate strength and reliability of composite material structures
19. Reliability analysis of rotorcraft composite structures10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2001)14:4(140) ↗
20. Design of composite wings including uncertainties: a probabilistic approach10.2514/1.39138 ↗
21. Mechanical property variability in FRP laminates and its effect on failure prediction10.1016/j.compositesb.2008.01.004 ↗
22. Fertig · 2014 · 2
23. The stochastic finite element method: past, present and future10.1016/j.cma.2008.11.007 ↗
24. Influence of the fiber geometry on the macroscopic elastic and thermal properties10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2014.05.013 ↗
25. A Micromechanics-based nonlocal constitutive equation and estimates of representative volume element size for elastic composites10.1016/0022-5096(96)00007-5 ↗
26. Representative volume: existence and size determination10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.12.021 ↗
27. Determination of the size of the representative volume element for random composites: statistical and numerical approach10.1016/S0020-7683(03)00143-4 ↗
28. Influence of geometrical parameters on the elastic response of unidirectional composite materials10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.05.004 ↗
29. Material spatial randomness: from statistical to representative volume element10.1016/j.probengmech.2005.07.007 ↗
30. The influence of the representative volume element (RVE) size on the homogenized response of cured fiber composites10.1088/0965-0393/20/7/075007 ↗
31. Determination of the size of the representative volume element for random quasi-brittle composites10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.03.015 ↗
32. An efficient RVE formulation for the analysis of the elastic properties of spherical nanoparticle reinforced polymers10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.09.030 ↗
33. Representative volume element for non-uniform micro-structure10.1016/S0927-0256(01)00257-9 ↗
34. Does representative volume element exist for quasi-brittle composites?10.1016/j.msea.2011.06.063 ↗
35. Determination of the critical size of a statistical representative volume element (SRVE) for carbon reinforced polymers☆10.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.042 ↗
36. A two-scale method for matrix cracking probability in fibre-reinforced composites based on a statistical representative volume element10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.030 ↗
37. Micromechanical FE analysis of UD fibre-reinforced composites with fibres distributed at random over the transverse cross-section10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.01.010 ↗
38. Size effects in the distribution for strength of brittle matrix fibrous composites10.1016/S0020-7683(96)00034-0 ↗
39. The “tough” to brittle transition in brittle matrix composites10.1016/0022-5096(93)90007-3 ↗
40. Gonzalez · 2008
41. Estimating the dimension of a model10.1214/aos/1176344136 ↗
42. A new look at the statistical model identification
43. Sheppared · 2012