Constitutive modelling of fibre-reinforced composites with unidirectional plies using a plasticity-based approach
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents the development of a constitutive model able to accurately represent the full non-linear mechanical response of polymer-matrix fibre-reinforced composites with unidirectional (UD) plies under quasi-static loading. This is achieved by utilising an elasto-plastic modelling framework. The model captures key features that are often neglected in constitutive modelling of UD composites, such as the effect of hydrostatic pressure on both the elastic and non-elastic material response, the effect of multiaxial loading and dependence of the yield stress on the applied pressure.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Cellular and Composite Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. A new static failure criterion for isotropic polymers10.1023/A:1014269314272 ↗
2. Effects of hydrostatic pressure on the mechanical behavior of composite materials10.1177/089270579500800403 ↗
3. Effects of hydrostatic pressure on in-plane shear properties of graphite/epoxy composites10.1177/002199839202600604 ↗
4. Compressive failure and kinking in uniaxially aligned glass-resin composite under superposed hydrostatic pressure10.1007/BF00752211 ↗
5. The effect of hydrostatic pressure on the shear yield behaviour of polymers10.1007/BF02427181 ↗
6. Pinho ST, Darvizeh R, Robinson P, Schuecker C, Camanho PP. Material and structural response of polymer–matrix fibre-reinforced composites. Compos Sci Technol, in press (Special issue on Second World Wide Failure Exercise).
7. Physically based non-linear stress strain relations for the inter-fibre fracture analysis of FRP laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.008 ↗
8. Failure of carbon/epoxy lamina under combined stress10.1177/002199838702100703 ↗
9. Yield criteria for quasibrittle and frictional materials10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.12.024 ↗
10. Karner GD, Manatschal G, Pinheiro LM. Imaging, mapping and modelling continental lithosphere extension and breakup, vol. 282. Geological Society Special Publication; 2007.10.1144/SP282.0 ↗
11. Three-parameter yield criterion for a brittle polyester resin10.1007/BF02402937 ↗
12. Abaqus. Abaqus 6.9 Documentation. Simulia, 2009.
13. The macroscopic yield behaviour of polymers10.1007/BF00550671 ↗
14. A yield criterion for anisotropic and pressure dependent solids such as oriented polymers10.1007/BF00754900 ↗
15. Constitutive modeling of polymeric foam material subjected to dynamic crash loading10.1016/S0734-743X(97)00087-0 ↗
16. Simulation of strength difference in elasto-plasticity for adhesive materials10.1002/nme.1315 ↗
17. A constitutive model for thermoplastic materials subjected to high strain rates10.1002/pamm.200510128 ↗
18. A plasticity model for unidirectional composite materials and its applications in modeling composites testing10.1016/0266-3538(95)00035-6 ↗
19. Implementation of an associative flow rule including hydrostatic stress effects into the high strain rate deformation analysis of polymer matrix composites10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2005)18:1(18) ↗
20. Goldberg RK. Implementation of fiber substructuring into strain rate dependent micromechanics analysis of polymer matrix composites. NASA/TM-2001-210822. NASA Glenn Research Center. Cleveland, Ohio; 2001.
21. A new anisotropic failure criterion for transversely isotropic solids
22. Plasticity theory for fibre-reinforced composites10.1007/BF00043230 ↗
23. Invariant based transversely-isotropic material and failure model for fiber-reinforced polymers
24. Jirasek M. Modeling of localized inelastic deformation, Czech Technical University; 2006.
25. Dean G, Crocker L. Prediction of the impact performance of plastics using finite element methods. National Physics Laboratory, Teddington, TW11 0LW, No. 87 edition; 2006.
26. Lubliner J. Plasticity theory. Pearson Education; 2006.
27. Simo · 2000
28. An anisotropic yield surface model for directionally reinforced metal–matrix composites10.1016/S0749-6419(95)00035-6 ↗
29. An experimental study of elastic–plastic behavior of a fibrous boron–aluminum composite10.1016/0022-5096(88)90003-8 ↗
30. Towards a micromechanics based inelastic and damage modeling of composites10.1016/S0749-6419(00)00056-5 ↗
31. A meso–macro finite element modelling of laminate structures: part ii: time-dependent behaviour10.1016/S0263-8223(03)00012-6 ↗
32. Strength of textile composites in multiscale simulation
33. Dunne · 2005
34. Kaddour AS, Hinton MJ. Instructions to contributors of the second world-wide failure exercise (WWFE-II): Part (a); 2007.
35. The effect of hydrostatic pressure on the mechanical properties of glass fibre/epoxy unidirectional composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.06.004 ↗
36. Effects of hydrostatic pressure on the torsional shear behavior of graphite/epoxy composites10.1177/002199839202600401 ↗
37. Christian JT, Desai CS. Constitutive laws for geologic media; 1977.
38. Desai · 1984