journal article·2011-11

A cohesive zone model for predicting delamination suppression in z-pinned laminates

Francesco Bianchi, Xiang Zhang

Composites Science and Technology· Volume 71· Issue 16
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a cohesive zone model based finite element analysis of delamination resistance of z-pin reinforced double cantilever beam (DCB). The main difference between this and existing cohesive zone models is that each z-pin bridging force is governed by a traction–separation law derived from a meso-mechanical model of the pin pullout process, which is independent of the fracture toughness of unreinforced laminate. Therefore, two different traction–separation laws are used: one representing the toughness of unreinforced laminate and the other the enhanced delamination toughness owing to the pin bridging action. This approach can account for the large scale bridging effect and avoid using concentrated pin forces, thus removing the mesh dependency and permitting more accurate analysis solution. Computations were performed using a simplified unit strip model. Predicted delamination growth and load vs. displacement relation are in excellent agreement with the prediction by a complete model, and both models are in good agreement with test measured load vs. displacement relation. For a pinned DCB specimen, the unit strip model can reduce the computing time by 85%.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Textile materials and evaluations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Improving the delamination resistance of CFRP by stitching – a review10.1016/0266-3538(94)90019-1 ↗
2. Review of z-pinned composite laminates10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.08.016 ↗
3. 3D reinforcement of stiffener-to-skin T-joints by Z-pinning and tufting10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.06.012 ↗
4. Mechanisms of crack bridging by composite and metallic rods10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.006 ↗
5. Delamination of Z-pinned carbon fibre reinforced laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.12.018 ↗
6. Exploring mechanical property balance in tufted carbon fabric/epoxy composites10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.06.004 ↗
7. Finite element analyses of mode I interlaminar delamination in z-fibre reinforced composite laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00134-9 ↗
8. Concepts for bridged mode II delamination cracks10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00107-0 ↗
9. On the effect of stitching on mode I delamination toughness of laminated composites10.1016/0266-3538(94)90103-1 ↗
10. Mode I DCB testing of composite laminates reinforced with z-direction pins: a simple model for the investigation of data reduction strategies10.1016/S0013-7944(03)00116-4 ↗
11. Bending effect of through-thickness reinforcement rods on mode I delamination toughness of DCB specimen – I – Linearly elastic and rigid-perfectly plastic models10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2004.06.010 ↗
12. The estimate of the effect of z-pins on the strain energy release rate, fracture and fatigue in a composite co-cured z-pinned double cantilever beam10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.02.014 ↗
13. Ratcliffe JG, O’Brien TK. Discrete spring model for predicting delamination growth in z-fibre reinforced DCB specimens. NASA Report NASA/TM-2004-213019, May 2004.
14. Numerical study on the mode I delamination toughness of z-pinned laminates10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00167-2 ↗
15. Mode II delamination toughness of z-pinned laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.02.008 ↗
16. Grassi M. Numerical modelling of composite laminates with through-thickness-reinforcements. PhD Thesis, Cranfield University; 2004.
17. Cohesive modeling of delamination in Z-pin reinforced composite laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.07.024 ↗
18. Simulating DCB, ENF and MMB experiments using shell elements and a cohesive zone model10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00255-0 ↗
19. Modeling of composite fracture using cohesive zone and bridging models10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.013 ↗
20. On using a penalty-based cohesive-zone finite element approach, part I: elastic solution benchmarks10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.06.003 ↗
21. On using a penalty-based cohesive-zone finite element approach, part II: inelastic peeling of an epoxy-bonded aluminum strip10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.06.004 ↗
22. Decohesion finite element with enriched basis functions for delamination10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.08.002 ↗
23. A finite element calculation of stress intensity factors by a modified crack closure integral10.1016/0013-7944(77)90013-3 ↗
24. The effect of stitch distribution on mode I delamination toughness of stitched laminated composites – experimental results and FEA simulation10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.06.002 ↗
25. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids10.1098/rsta.1921.0006 ↗
26. Simulation of pin-reinforced single-lap composite joints10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.013 ↗
27. Finite element modelling of bridging micro-mechanics in through-thickness reinforced composite laminates10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.025 ↗
28. Snubbing effects in the pullout of a fibrous rod from a laminate10.1080/15376490490493899 ↗
29. A constitutive model for through-thickness reinforcement bridging a delamination crack10.1177/096369359900800507 ↗
30. A traction law for inclined fiber tows bridging mixed-mode cracks10.1080/15376490290096973 ↗
31. Analysis of the effect of embedded fibre length on fibre debonding and pull-out from an elastic matrix – part 1 review of theories10.1007/BF00540456 ↗
32. Experimental study on effect of loading rate on mode I delamination of z-pin reinforced laminates10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.10.001 ↗