Finite element simulation of delamination growth in composite materials using LS-DYNA
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, a modified adaptive cohesive element is presented. The new elements are developed and implemented in LS-DYNA, as a user defined material subroutine (UMAT), to stabilize the finite element simulations of delamination propagation in composite laminates under transverse loads. In this model, a pre-softening zone is proposed ahead of the existing softening zone. In this pre-softening zone, the initial stiffness and the interface strength are gradually decreased. The onset displacement corresponding to the onset damage is not changed in the proposed model. In addition, the critical energy release rate of the materials is kept constant. Moreover, the constitutive equation of the new cohesive model is developed to be dependent on the opening velocity of the displacement jump. The traction based model includes a cohesive zone viscosity parameter (g) to vary the degree of rate dependence and to adjust the maximum traction. The numerical simulation results of DCB in Mode-I is presented to illustrate the validity of the new model. It is shown that the proposed model brings stable simulations, overcoming the numerical instability and can be widely used in quasi-static, dynamic and impact problems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Camanho P, Davila C, Ambur D. Numerical simulation of delamination growth in composite materials. NASA-TP-211041; 2001: 1–19.
2. Modeling compression failure after low velocity impact on laminated composites using interface elements10.1177/002199839703101501 ↗
3. Modeling the initiation and growth of delaminations in composite structures10.1177/002199839703100804 ↗
4. Predicting progressive delamination of composite material specimens via interface elements10.1080/107594199305476 ↗
5. Prediction of delamination initiation and growth from discontinues plies using interface elements10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00134-6 ↗
6. A combined stress-based and fracture mechanics-based model for predicting delamination in composites10.1016/0010-4361(93)90016-2 ↗
7. Shahwan K, Waas A. Non-self-similar decohesion along a finite interface of unilaterally constrained delaminations. In: Proceeding of the Royal Society of London; 1997. p. 515–50.10.1098/rspa.1997.0029 ↗
8. Fracture analysis of composite co-cured structural joints using decohesion elements10.1111/j.1460-2695.2004.00695.x ↗
9. A strain-rate dependent crack model10.1016/0022-5096(71)90012-3 ↗
10. A micromechanical model of crack growth along polymer interfaces10.1016/0167-6636(91)90007-M ↗
11. Analysis of a rate dependent cohesive model for dynamic crack propagation10.1016/S0013-7944(02)00042-5 ↗
12. Effect of strain-dependent cohesive zone model on predictions of crack growth resistance10.1016/0020-7683(95)00261-8 ↗
13. A study of dynamic crack growth in elastic materials using a cohesive zone model10.1016/S0020-7225(97)00030-X ↗
14. Progressive delamination using interface element10.1177/002199839803201401 ↗
15. Interface element including point-to-surface constraints for three-dimensional problems with damage propagation10.1108/02644400010308053 ↗
16. A simple technique for avoiding convergence problems in finite element simulations of crack nucleation and growth on cohesive interfaces10.1088/0965-0393/12/3/007 ↗
17. Stable numerical simulations of propagations of complex damages in composite structures under transverse loads10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.04.014 ↗
18. An incremental approach to the solution of snapping and buckling problems10.1016/0020-7683(79)90081-7 ↗
19. Gustafson PA, Waas AM. Efficient and robust traction laws for the modeling of adhesively bonded joints. In: 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference, Schaumburg, IL, AIAA-2008-1847; 2008. p. 1–16.10.2514/6.2008-1847 ↗
20. Discrete cohesive zone model for mixed-mode fracture using finite element analysis10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.03.006 ↗
21. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, California, USA, LS-DYNA 970; 2005.
22. Davila C, Camanho P, de Moura M. Mixed-mode decohesion elements for analyses of progressive delamination. In: 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structes, structural dynamics and material conference, Washington, USA: AIAA-01-1486; 2001. p. 1–12.10.2514/6.2001-1486 ↗
23. Formulation and implementation of decohesion elements in an explicit finite element code10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.007 ↗
24. Prediction of compressive strength of carbon-epoxy laminates containing delaminations by using a mixed-mode damage model10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00091-X ↗
25. Numerical simulation of mixed-mode progressive delamination in composite materials10.1177/0021998303034505 ↗
26. Numerical simulation of the crushing process of composite materials10.1533/ijcr.2004.0287 ↗
27. Morais A, Marques A, de Castro P. Estudo da aplicacao de ensaios de fractura interlaminar de mode I a laminados compositos multidireccionais. Proceedings of the 7as jornadas de fractura, Sociedade Portuguesa de Materiais, Portugal; 2000. p. 90–5.
28. Camanho P, Davila C. Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials. NASA/TM-2002-211737; 2002. p. 1–37.
29. Moshier M. Ram load simulation of wing skin-spar joints: new rate-dependent cohesive model. RHAMM Technologies LLC, USA, Report No. R-05-01; 2006.10.21236/ADA448143 ↗