journal article·2006-08

A new composite structure impact performance assessment program

Paolo Feraboli, Keith T. Kedward

Composites Science and Technology· Volume 66· Issue 10
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract While previous researchers have conducted their study on the relative impact performance of composite structures from a force or an energy standpoint only, this proposed Composite Structure Impact Performance Assessment Program (CSIPAP) suggests a multi-parameter methodology to gain further insight in the impact behavior of composite structures. These are peak and critical force; critical and dissipated energy; contact duration and coefficient of restitution (COR), which is direct indication of effective structural stiffness; and residual stiffness (normalized contact duration) which yields a plot that bears a striking resemblance with the normalized Compression After Impact (CAI) strength. Using a determinate impactor/target system as baseline configuration, the program is applied toward the understanding of the role played in an impact event by fundamental impactor and target parameters. The equations previously derived for the prediction of the force–energy and residual stiffness curves are shown to apply to the configurations tested, thus confirming their general validity. A modification to the existing effective structural stiffness formulation, which does not account for impactor characteristics, is proposed, and it comprises the impactor material, size and mass characteristics.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Transportation Safety and Impact Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Enhanced evaluation of the low velocity impact response of composite plates10.2514/1.4534 ↗
2. Feraboli P, Kedward K. A multi-parameter approach to impact performance characterization. In: 19th ASC/ASTM Joint Technical Conference; 2004.
3. Modified SDOF models for improved representation of the impact response of composite materials10.1177/0021998306062318 ↗
4. Jackson WC, Poe CC. The use of impact force as a scale parameter for the impact response of composite laminates. J Compos Technol Res, 15/4, Winter; 1993. p. 282–9.10.1520/CTR10380J ↗
5. Nettles AT, Douglas MJ. A comparison of quasi-static indentation to low-velocity impact, NASA TP-2000-210481, Aug.; 2003.10.1520/STP10634S ↗
6. Ambur D, Kemmerly HL. Influence of impactor mass on the damage characteristics and failure strength of laminated composite plates. In: 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference, No. 98-1784; 1998.10.2514/6.1998-1784 ↗
7. Response of laminated composite plates to low speed impact by different impactors10.2514/3.12129 ↗
8. Ambur DR, Starnes JH, Prasad CB. Influence of impact parameters on the response of laminated composite plates. In: Martin RH, editor. ASTM STP 1230; 1995. p. 389–404.10.1520/STP14026S ↗
9. Energy-based approach to impact damage in CFRP10.1016/S1359-835X(96)00151-0 ↗
10. Low velocity impact induced damage of continuous fiber-reinforced composite laminates. Part II. Verification and numerical investigation10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00078-7 ↗
11. Sjöblom P. Simple design approach against low velocity impact damage. In: 32nd international SAMPE symposium; 1987. p. 529–39.
12. On low velocity impact testing of composite materials10.1177/002199838802200103 ↗
13. Effect of impact damage on the residual compressive strength of glass–fibre reinforced polyester (GFRP) laminates10.1016/0263-8223(96)00031-1 ↗
14. Size effects on impact response of composite laminates10.1016/S0734-743X(98)00036-0 ↗
15. Instrumented low-velocity impact of CFRP beams10.1016/0734-743X(94)00048-2 ↗
16. Experiment and analysis on the response of curved laminated composite panels subjected to low velocity impact10.1016/S0734-743X(98)00026-8 ↗
17. Prediction of Impact force and duration due to low-velocity impact on circular composite laminates10.1115/1.3169120 ↗
18. Low velocity impact tests of laminate glass fiber epoxy matrix composite material plates10.1016/S0734-743X(01)00040-9 ↗
19. Delamination threshold loads for low velocity impacts on composite laminates10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00061-0 ↗
20. Liu D, Raju BB. Effects of bending-twisting coupling on impact resistance of composite laminates. In: 18th A.S.C. technical conference; 2003.
21. Tomblin J, Suresh Raju K, Arosteguy G. Damage resistance and tolerance of composite sandwich panels – scaling effects – DOT/FAA AR-03/75. Feb.; 2004.
22. MIL-HDBK-17-3F: vol. 3 – Damage resistance, durability and damage tolerance [chapter 7].
23. Hahn HT, Mitrovic M, Turkgenc O. The effect of loading parameters on fatigue of composite laminates: part III, DOT/FAA/AR-99/22, June: 1999.
24. Shyprykevich P, Tomblin J, Ilcewicz L, Vizzini AJ, Lacy TE, Hwang Y. Guidelines for analysis, testing, and nondestructive inspection of impact-damaged composite sandwich structures – DOT/FAA AR-02/121, March; 2003.
25. The significance of indentation in the inspection of carbon fibre-reinforced plastic panels damaged by low velocity impact10.1016/S0266-3538(99)00196-7 ↗
26. Indentation and penetration of carbon fibre reinforced plastic laminates10.1016/S1359-8368(03)00002-7 ↗