The drilling of an Al/SiCp metal-matrix composites. Part I: microstructure
Source abstract
Abstract
Automotive, aircraft and train companies need to replace steel and cast iron in mechanical components with lighter high strength alloys like Al metal matrix composites (MMC). Despite the superior mechanical and thermal properties of particulate metal matrix composites, their poor machinability is the main deterrent to their substitution of metal parts. Machining is a material removal process and therefore is important for the final fabrication stage prior to application. Consequently the development of effective machining methods, leading to a reduction in the overall cost of components, is one of the major challenges yet to be solved. In this study, the influence of the type of drills, point angles of drills and ageing on the drilling performance of 2124 aluminum alloy reinforced with 17% SiC particulates was investigated experimentally. The workpiece material was drilled in four heat treatment conditions: as-received, solution treated, and solution treated and aged for 4 and 24 h. The experimental studies were conducted under different settings of spindle-speed and feed rate and point angles of drill. Drilling tests were carried out using high-speed steel (HSS), TiN coated HSS and solid carbide drills. The drills used were 5 mm diameter. The experimental results indicated that, the effect of point angles on the sub-surface damage caused by the drilling operation was changed with the type of drills.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Microstructural development in an aluminum alloy-SiC whisker composite10.1016/0001-6160(88)90236-2 ↗
2. Drilling studies of an Al2O3–Al metal matrix composite10.1007/BF00369677 ↗
3. Effect of heat treatment on the drilling performance of aluminium/SiC MMC10.1023/A:1008853525975 ↗
4. Machining of Al/SiC particulate metal–matrix composites part I10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00054-5 ↗
5. Machining of Al/SiC particulate metal–matrix composites part II10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00072-7 ↗
6. A guide to machining metal matrix composites with syndite PCD
7. Aluminum based MMC machining with diamond-coated tools10.1016/S0257-8972(97)00521-5 ↗
8. High-speed turning experiments on metal matrix composites10.1016/S1359-835X(98)00105-5 ↗
9. Lane · 1990
10. Chip formation in machining particle-reinforced metal matrix composites10.1080/10426919808935221 ↗
11. Wear of rotary carbide tools in machining of Al/SiCp composites10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00092-7 ↗
12. Analysis of chip breaking during orthogonal machining of Al/SiCp composites10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00379-3 ↗
13. A study of the surface texture of composite drilled holes10.1016/0924-0136(93)90103-D ↗
14. Machinability of particulates aluminum matrix composites10.1016/S0007-8506(07)61151-2 ↗
15. Wear characteristic of various hard materials for machining SiC-reinforced aluminum alloy10.1016/0043-1648(85)90243-1 ↗
16. The sliding wear behaviour of Al–SiC particulate composites II10.1016/1359-6454(95)00218-9 ↗
17. Danoldson · 1983
18. Wear—a critical synoptic view10.1115/1.3453231 ↗
19. Kendell LA, Tool wear and tool life. In: Metal handbook, vol. 16. 9th ed. 1989. p. 37–48.10.31399/asm.hb.v16.a0002120 ↗