journal article·2022-10Open access

Predicting fracture in the proximal humerus using phase field models

L. Hug, G. Dahan, S. Kollmannsberger, E. Rank, Z. Yosibash

Abstract

Proximal humerus impacted fractures are of clinical concern in the elderly population. Prediction of such fractures by CT-based finite element methods encounters several major obstacles such as heterogeneous mechanical properties and fracture due to compressive strains. We herein propose to investigate a variation of the phase field method (PFM) embedded into the finite cell method (FCM) to simulate impacted humeral fractures in fresh frozen human humeri. The force-strain response, failure loads and the fracture path are compared to experimental observations for validation purposes. The PFM (by means of the regularization parameter ℓ0) is first calibrated by one experiment and thereafter used for the prediction of the mechanical response of two other human fresh frozen humeri. All humeri are fractured at the surgical neck and strains are monitored by Digital Image Correlation (DIC). Experimental strains in the elastic regime are reproduced with good agreement (R2=0.726), similarly to the validated finite element method (Dahan et al., 2022). The failure pattern and fracture evolution at the surgical neck predicted by the PFM mimic extremely well the experimental observations for all three humeri. The maximum relative error in the computed failure loads is 3.8%. To the best of our knowledge this is the first method that can predict well the experimental compressive failure pattern as well as the force-strain relationship in proximal humerus fractures.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Numerical methods in engineering · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. A global–local approach for hydraulic phase-field fracture in poroelastic media10.1016/j.camwa.2020.07.013 ↗
2. Specimen-specific modeling of hip fracture pattern and repair10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.033 ↗
3. Phase-field modeling of ductile fracture10.1007/s00466-015-1151-4 ↗
4. Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: Numerical experiments10.1016/j.jmps.2009.04.011 ↗
5. Phase-field formulation for ductile fracture
6. Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00028-9 ↗
7. The variational approach to fracture10.1007/s10659-007-9107-3 ↗
8. The epidemiology of open fractures in adults. A 15-year review10.1016/j.injury.2011.12.007 ↗
9. Can neck fractures in proximal humeri be predicted by CT-based FEA?10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111039 ↗
10. Finite element analyses for predicting anatomical neck fractures in the proximal humerus10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.05.028 ↗
11. An accurate strategy for computing reaction forces and fluxes on trimmed locally refined meshes10.1093/jom/ufac006 ↗
12. A variational approach to fracture and other inelastic phenomena10.1007/s10659-013-9444-3 ↗
13. Robust QCT/FEA models of proximal femur stiffness and fracture load during a sideways fall on the hip10.1007/s10439-010-0196-y ↗
14. The finite cell method for three-dimensional problems of solid mechanics10.1016/j.cma.2008.02.036 ↗
15. Multi-level hp-finite cell method for embedded interface problems with application in biomechanics10.1002/cnm.2951 ↗
16. Cadaveric-biomechanical evaluation of bone-implant construct of proximal humerus fractures (neer type 3)10.1097/01.TA.0000033139.61038.EF ↗
17. Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9 ↗
18. Regularized variational theories of fracture: A unified approach10.1016/j.jmps.2010.02.010 ↗
19. Conversion relations for quantitative CT bone mineral densities measured with solid and liquid calibration standards10.1016/0169-6009(92)90922-Z ↗
20. Subject-specific FE models of the human femur predict fracture path and bone strength under single-leg-stance loading10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.104118 ↗
21. A robust 3D finite element simulation of human proximal femur progressive fracture under stance load with experimental validation10.1007/s10439-013-0864-9 ↗
22. Anisotropy of Young’s modulus of human tibial cortical bone10.1007/BF02347055 ↗
23. A 3D benchmark problem for crack propagation in brittle fracture10.1016/j.cma.2020.112905 ↗
24. Scanner influence on the mechanical response of QCT-based finite element analysis of long bones10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.01.049 ↗
25. Patient-specific finite element analysis of femurs with cemented hip implants10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.06.012 ↗
26. Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone10.1016/0021-9290(94)90056-6 ↗
27. Correlations between orthogonal mechanical properties and density of trabecular bone: Use of different densitometric measures10.1002/jbm.820281111 ↗
28. Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: Nationwide emergency department sample, 200810.1002/acr.21563 ↗
29. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) derived bone mineral density (BMD) in finite element studies: A review of the literature10.1186/s40634-016-0072-2 ↗
30. Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: Variational principles and multi-field FE implementations10.1002/nme.2861 ↗
31. Phase-field modeling of brittle fracture with multi-level hp-FEM and the finite cell method10.1007/s00466-018-1649-7 ↗
32. Multi-phase-field modeling of anisotropic crack propagation for polycrystalline materials10.1007/s00466-017-1409-0 ↗
33. Initiation and propagation of complex 3D networks of cracks in heterogeneous quasi-brittle materials: Direct comparison between in situ testing-microCT experiments and phase field simulations10.1016/j.jmps.2016.06.004 ↗
34. Experimental and numerical investigation of secondary screw perforation in the human proximal humerus10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104344 ↗
35. Finite cell method10.1007/s00466-007-0173-y ↗
36. Young’s modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: Ultrasonic and microtensile measurements10.1016/0021-9290(93)90042-D ↗
37. High-accuracy phase-field models for brittle fracture based on a new family of degradation functions10.1016/j.jmps.2017.10.015 ↗
38. An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.05.017 ↗
39. Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.02.010 ↗
40. Small and large deformation analysis with the p-and B-spline versions of the finite cell method10.1007/s00466-012-0684-z ↗
41. A novel phase field method for modeling the fracture of long bones10.1002/cnm.3211 ↗
42. Radiographic morphometry and densitometry predict strength of cadaveric proximal humeri more reliably than age and DXA scan density10.1002/jor.22994 ↗
43. Crack nucleation in variational phase-field models of brittle fracture10.1016/j.jmps.2017.09.006 ↗
44. Patient-specific FE analyses of metatarsal bones with inhomogeneous isotropic material properties10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.08.030 ↗
45. Epidemiology of fragility fractures and fall prevention in the elderly: A systematic review of the literature10.1097/BCO.0000000000000563 ↗
46. Cohesive finite element modeling of age-related toughness loss in human cortical bone10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.10.018 ↗
47. An efficient integration technique for the voxel-based finite cell method10.1002/nme.4269 ↗
48. Influence of bone composition and apparent density on fracture toughness of the human femur and tibia10.1016/S8756-3282(97)00227-5 ↗
49. Fracture simulation of viscoelastic polymers by the phase-field method10.1007/s00466-019-01769-1 ↗
50. Predicting the stiffness and strength of human femurs with real metastatic tumors10.1016/j.bone.2014.09.022 ↗
51. A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in-vitro experiments10.1115/1.2720906 ↗
52. Predicting the yield of the proximal femur using high-order finite-element analysis with inhomogeneous orthotropic material properties10.1098/rsta.2010.0074 ↗
53. Reliable simulations of the human proximal femur by high-order finite element analysis validated by experimental observations10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.06.017 ↗
54. The finite cell method for linear thermoelasticity10.1016/j.camwa.2012.09.002 ↗
55. Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00111-6 ↗