journal article·2012-12

Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants

Carlos Nelson Elias, Felipe Assis Rocha, Ana Lucia Nascimento, Paulo Guilherme Coelho

Publisher page

Abstract

The primary stability of dental implants has been investigated before, but a study of the influence of implant shape, size and surface morphology (machined, acid etched or anodized), surgical technique (press-fit or undersized) and substrate (natural or simulated bone) on the primary stability of dental implants has not been reported. The present work intends to fill this gap. In this work, six different dental implants were inserted into and removed from synthetic and natural bone while measuring the torque. A total of 255 dental implants with three shapes, four sizes and three surface topographies were inserted into pig rib, PTFE and polyurethane. The implant sites were prepared using straight and tapered drills. The primary stability was estimated from the maximum insertion torque. Comparisons between samples were based on the maximum insertion torque (MIT), the maximum removal torque (MRT) and the torque ratio (TR=MRT/MIT). The insertion torque into pig ribs showed larger dispersion. All parameters (shape, size and surface morphology of the implant, surgical technique and substrate type) were found to have a significant influence on primary stability. The insertion of a tapered implant requires a higher torque than the insertion of a straight implant. Surface treatments improve the primary stability. The influence of the surgical technique is smaller than that of implant size and shape. The highest insertion torque was that of anodized tapered implants inserted into undersized sites. Finally, the primary stability of dental implants is highly dependent on implant design, surgical technique and substrate type.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Dental materials and restorations · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Differences in implant stability associated with various methods of preparation of the implant bed: an in vitro study10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60092-4 ↗
2. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone to implant anchorage in man10.3109/17453678108991776 ↗
3. Undersized implant site preparation to enhance primary implant stability in poor bone density: a prospective clinical study10.1016/j.joms.2011.08.007 ↗
4. Quantifying the influence of bone density and thickness on resonance frequency analysis: an in vitro study of biomechanical test materials
5. Bickford · 1995
6. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period
7. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures with immediate loading: a retrospective multicenter study on 226 consecutive cases10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00007.x ↗
8. The effect of different implant macrogeometries and surface treatment in early biomechanical fixation: an experimental study in dogs10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.06.016 ↗
9. Immediate versus delayed loading of dental implants placed in fresh extraction sockets in the maxillary esthetic zone
10. 7-Year follow-up of 93 immediately loaded titanium dental implants10.1563/0-730.1 ↗
11. Five-year outcome of 111 immediate nonfunctional single restorations10.1563/0.795.1 ↗
12. The effects of superficial roughness and design on the primary stability of dental implants10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00202.x ↗
13. Duckworth · 1968
14. Influence of the coating material on the loosing of dental implant abutment screw joints10.1016/j.msec.2005.08.011 ↗
15. Improving osseointegrtion of dental implants10.1586/erd.09.74 ↗
16. Relationship between surface properties (roughness, wettability and morphology) of titanium and dental implant removal torque10.1016/j.jmbbm.2007.12.002 ↗
17. The effect of implant design on insertion torque and immediate micromotion10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02142.x ↗
18. Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures
19. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review10.1016/j.jdent.2010.05.013 ↗
20. Self-cutting blades and their influence on primary stability of tapered dental implants in a simulated low-density bone model: a laboratory study10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.12.001 ↗
21. Lekholm, U., Zarb, G.A., 1985. Patient selection and preparation. In: Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry, Quintessence International Ed., Chicago, pp. 199–209.
22. Misch, C.E., 2007. Bone density: a key determinant for clinical success. In: Contemporary Implant Dentistry, Edition 3, Elsevier Health Sciences, p. 109.
23. Correlation between placement torque and survival of single-tooth implants
24. Implant loading protocols for partially edentulous maxillary posterior sites
25. The effects of implant surface roughness and surgical technique on implant fixation in an in vitro model10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01202.x ↗
26. Shigley · 1977
27. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in implant dentistry10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011001012.x ↗
28. Timing of loading and effect of micromotion on bone-dental implant interface: review of experimental literature10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199822)43:2<192::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
29. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01692.x ↗
30. Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01679.x ↗
31. Biomechanical aspects of primary implant stability: a human cadaver study10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00097.x ↗
32. Effect of bone density on the damping behavior of dental implants: an in vitro method10.1016/j.msec.2005.08.019 ↗
33. Implant insertional torque values predict outcomes10.1016/j.joms.2010.11.008 ↗
34. Wennerberg, A., Albrektsson, T., Lindhe, J., 2003. Surface topography of titanium implants. In: Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, fourth ed., pp. 821–825.