Failure of silicone gel breast implants: Is the mechanical weakening due to shell swelling a significant cause of prostheses rupture?
Source abstract
Abstract
Silicone gel-filled breast implants nowadays are commonly used in breast surgery. Despite the improvements carried out during the years in the device design and manufacturing technologies, the long-term reliability of such prostheses is still doubted and the phenomena involved in the prostheses failure not yet clearly defined. This study investigates rupture causes by analysing the mechanical properties of failed and intact implants in the recent generation of silicon gel breast implants. The main scope is to assess whether mechanical weakness of the shells should be considered as a major cause of breast implant rupture or, on the contrary, the prosthesis shell damage is likely due to other random factors. Some tests were performed on the shells of a wide number of explanted prostheses, to evaluate the mechanical properties as a function of prostheses status at explantation (intact/ruptured) and variable degree of swelling. A weakening of the shell mechanical properties, so as a significant difference in the ultimate strength and stiffness of intact versus ruptured prostheses, was found. This attenuation of the properties may be justified as a consequence of the shell swelling phenomenon during implantation and has to be considered as a significant mechanism for silicone gel breast implant failure.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Breast Implant and Reconstruction · Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (14)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM D 412-06ae2 Standard (2006)—standard test methods for vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic rubbers and thermoplastic elastomers-tension.
2. ASTM D 624-00 (2007)—standard test method for tear strength of conventional vulcanized rubber and thermoplastic elastomers.
3. Ultimate strength properties of control and explanted Silastic 0 and Silastic I silicone gel-filled breast implant shells10.1053/aq.1999.v19.101951001 ↗
4. Ultimate strength properties of explanted and control Silastic II silicone gel-filled breast implant shells10.1067/maj.2000.106399 ↗
5. In vivo aging characteristics of silicone gel breast implants compared to lot-matched controls10.1097/00006534-200205000-00024 ↗
6. Biodurability of retrieved silicone gel breast implants10.1097/01.PRS.0000060795.16982.1C ↗
7. Protocol for retrieval and analysis of breast implants10.1615/JLongTermEffMedImplants.v13.i1.60 ↗
8. Mechanical analysis of explanted silicone breast implants10.1097/00006534-199608000-00008 ↗
9. Silicone gel breast implant failure: evaluation of properties of shells and gels for explanted prostheses and meta-analysis of literature rupture data10.1097/00000637-200209000-00001 ↗
10. Silicone gel breast implant failure and frequency of additional surgeries: analysis of 35 studies reporting examination of more than 8000 explants10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(1999)48:3<354::AID-JBM21>3.0.CO;2-# ↗
11. Strength of silicone breast implants10.1097/00006534-199605000-00017 ↗
12. Effect of surgical insertion on the local shell properties of SILASTIC II silicone gel breast implants10.1163/156856200743544 ↗
13. Chemical, physical and mechanical analysis of explanted breast implants
14. The effect of cyclic swelling (octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane) on the physical properties of silicone breast implant shells10.1163/156856202753525918 ↗