Indentation size effect in Knoop and Vickers hardness measurement of dental resin-based composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Objectives Comparisons of material hardness may be affected by the indentation size effect (ISE), which is characterized by increasing hardness values at decreasing loads. This study aimed to assess the influence of load, dwell time and measurement method on ISE in dental resin-based composites with different filler content. Methods Knoop (HK) and Vickers (HV) microindentation hardness of Filtek Ultimate Universal Restorative (FU) and Filtek Supreme Flowable Restorative (FF) was measured under different loads (0.098-2.96 N, i.e. 10-300 gf) and dwell times (5-30 s). Their effects on HK and HV were evaluated using repeated measures ANOVA, which was also used to compare the measurement methods. Coefficients of Meyer's equation, proportional specimen resistance (PSR) model and a modified PSR model were calculated using regression analyses. Results ISE was more pronounced for the highly-filled FU than for the less-filled FF, and HK was more susceptible to ISE than HV. The effect of dwell time was similar for both materials and measurement methods; hardness values decreased with dwell time, significantly between 5 s and 30 s. Significance The possible presence of ISE should be considered when determining measurement conditions for the microindentation hardness of dental resin-based composites. HV was found to be less sensitive to ISE and provided stable hardness values at lower loads than HK. Due to the high variability of composites, any hardness measurement should be preceded by mapping the effect of load to ensure that load-independent hardness is measured. If hardness values continue to decrease in the whole range of increasing loads, load-independent hardness can be calculated using the PSR model.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments · Dental Erosion and Treatment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 2010
2. Polymerization shrinkage kinetics and shrinkage-stress in dental resin-composites10.1016/j.dental.2016.05.006 ↗
3. Restorative Resins - hardness and strength vs quantity of remaining double-bonds
4. 2022
5. Comparison of conventional Knoop and Vickers hardness of ceramic materials10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.02.014 ↗
6. Correlation of bottom-to-top surface microhardness and conversion ratios for a variety of resin composite compositions
7. On the origins and mechanisms of the indentation size effect
8. Miniature specimens for fracture toughness evaluation of dental resin composites10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.023 ↗
9. Comparison of instrumented Knoop and Vickers hardness measurements on various soft materials and hard ceramics10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.06.011 ↗
10. Strain gradient plasticity effect in indentation hardness of polymers10.1557/JMR.1999.0554 ↗
11. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: characterizing discrete filler particles and agglomerates using a micromanipulation technique10.1016/j.dental.2008.05.013 ↗
12. Nanoindentation of dental composites10.1002/jbm.b.30442 ↗
13. Nanomechanical properties of dental resin-composites10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.007 ↗
14. Nanoindentation creep versus bulk compressive creep of dental resin-composites10.1016/j.dental.2012.08.012 ↗
15. Correlation between hardness and degree of conversion during the setting reaction of unfilled dental restorative resins10.1016/S0109-5641(85)80058-0 ↗
16. Examination of the indentation size effect in low-load vickers hardness testing of ceramics10.1016/S0955-2219(99)00043-6 ↗
17. Effect of the irradiance distribution from light curing units on the local micro-hardness of the surface of dental resins10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.003 ↗
18. The effect of artificial aging on Martens hardness and indentation modulus of different dental CAD/CAM restorative materials10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.06.028 ↗
19. Spatial and cure-time distribution of dynamic-mechanical properties of a dimethacrylate nano-composite10.1016/j.dental.2008.11.008 ↗
20. Indentation size effect: reality or artefact?10.1007/BF00360764 ↗
21. 1987
22. 1990
23. 2015
24. 2016
25. 2019
26. 2023
27. 2023
28. Recent progresses in the phenomenological description for the indentation size effect in microhardness testing of brittle ceramics10.1007/s40145-012-0004-2 ↗
29. Assessment of nano-indentation method in mechanical characterization of heterogeneous nanocomposite materials using experimental and computational approaches10.1038/s41598-019-51904-4 ↗
30. The microhardness indentation load/size effect in rutile and cassiterite single crystals10.1007/BF00400874 ↗
31. Vickers indentation responses of epoxy polymers
32. A simple method for determining elastic-modulus–to-hardness ratios using Knoop indentation measurements10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10357.x ↗
33. Investigations of hardness testing and hardness
34. Depth of cure of dental resin composites: ISO 4049 Depth and microhardness of types of materials and shades10.2341/07-104 ↗
35. The influence of testing protocols on microhardness tests of composite resin with different viscosities
36. On the brittleness of enamel and selected dental materials10.1016/j.dental.2008.03.007 ↗
37. The indentation size effect: a critical examination of experimental observations and mechanistic interpretations10.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104456 ↗
38. Correlation between the beam profile from a curing light and the microhardness of four resins10.1016/j.dental.2014.10.001 ↗
39. Material properties and fractography of an indirect dental resin composite10.1016/j.dental.2010.02.008 ↗
40. Filler characteristics of modern dental resin composites and their influence on physico-mechanical properties10.1016/j.dental.2016.09.034 ↗
41. Martens hardness of CAD/CAM resin-based composites10.3390/app12157698 ↗
42. Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite10.1177/00220345880670060801 ↗
43. Microhardness and fracture toughness of dental materials by indentation method10.1002/jbm.b.30371 ↗
44. Review: indentation size effect, indentation cracks and microhardness measurement of brittle crystalline solids – some basic concepts and trends10.1002/crat.200900385 ↗
45. Analysis of the indentation size effect in the microhardness measurement of some cobalt-based alloys10.1016/S0254-0584(02)00086-X ↗
46. Degree of conversion and microhardness of TPO-containing resin-based composites cured by polywave and monowave LED units10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.007 ↗
47. Hardness measured with traditional Vickers and Martens hardness methods10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.001 ↗
48. On the correlation between hardness and tensile strength in particle reinforced metal matrix composites10.1016/S0921-5093(00)01256-9 ↗
49. Subsurface deformation associated with hardness measurements of composites10.1016/0109-5641(92)90088-T ↗
50. Comparative hardness and modulus of tooth-colored restoratives: a depth-sensing microindentation study10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.003 ↗
51. Influence of different indentation load and dwell time on Knoop microhardness tests for composite materials10.1016/S0142-9418(03)00104-1 ↗