Improving accuracy in assessing osseointegration in small animal bone using specimen-specific additively-manufactured fixtures based on clinical CT imaging
Source abstract
Abstract
Implant removal is a common method to quantify the level of osseointegration in small animal studies. Due to small implant sizes, precise alignment in removal experiments is crucial to obtain accurate and reproducible results. This study proposes a novel approach using photon counting detector (PCD)-CT data and additive manufacturing to improve implant alignment. A simplified finite element model was designed to investigate the effect of implant misalignment in torque removal tests. Additionally, the geometry of 43 rat tibiae was assessed utilizing PCD-CT scans, and subsequently specimen-specific positioning fixtures were designed and manufactured using computer-aided design and tabletop 3D printers. The accuracy and precision of the specimen alignment within the fixtures were assessed both visually (current state of the art) and through projectional radiography in both cranial-caudal (CC) and anterior-posterior (AP) projections to quantify true misalignment. Finite element analysis demonstrated that stresses and displacements are sensitive to misalignment, potentially leading to substantial inaccuracies in the implant removal measurements. Statistical analysis of visual assessments revealed poor to moderate inter- and intra-operator variability (0.336 ≤ ICC ≤ 0.625) and low correlation with true misalignment (0.024 ≤ R 2 ≤ 0.204). Specimen alignment within the fixtures (CC: 0.23±0.46˚, AP: 1.00±0.82˚) showed improvement in accuracy and precision compared to visual assessments (CC: 0.88±0.92˚, AP: 1.11±1.15˚). The proposed specimen fixation and alignment, which relies on clinical imaging data and inexpensive desktop 3D printers, offers a cost- and time-effective alternative to visual assessments, which could considerably improve the accuracy and precision in osseointegration assessment. • Biomechanical testing is used to quantify osseointegration levels • Test data is potentially affected by accuracy of bone positioning during testing • Finite element analysis highlights measurement sensitivity to specimen misalignment • Visual alignment of specimens shows poor accuracy and precision between operators • Proposed 3D-printed specimen-specific fixtures for standardized alignment
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anatomy and Medical Technology · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. Effect of local vs. systemic bisphosphonate delivery on dental implant fixation in a model of osteonecrosis of the jaw10.1177/0022034512472335 ↗
2. An overview of selected material properties in finite element modeling of the human femur10.3390/biomechanics3010012 ↗
3. Dimensional accuracy and precision and surgeon perception of additively manufactured bone models: effect of manufacturing technology and part orientation10.1186/s41205-024-00203-4 ↗
4. Minimal detectable bone fracture gaps in CT images and digital three-dimensional (3D) radii models10.1007/s10278-024-01185-9 ↗
5. 18
6. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration: an experimental in vivo investigation in the beagle dog10.1002/jor.1100160111 ↗
7. 3D visualization and quantification of rat cortical bone porosity using a desktop micro-CT system: a case study in the tibia10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03381.x ↗
8. The influence of Cisplatin-based chemotherapy on the osseointegration of dental implants: an in vivo mechanical and histometrical study10.1111/clr.13445 ↗
9. Osseointegration in osteoporotic-like condition: a systematic review of preclinical studies10.1111/jre.12566 ↗
10. Analysis of the effect of load direction on the stress distribution in dental implant10.1016/j.matdes.2009.10.042 ↗
11. Agglomeration effect on biomechanical performance of CNT-reinforced dental implant using micromechanics-based approach10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106023 ↗
12. Mandibular bone remodeling around osseointegrated functionally graded biomaterial implant using three dimensional finite element model10.1002/cnm.3750 ↗
13. Photon counting CT: clinical applications and future developments10.1109/TRPMS.2020.3020212 ↗
14. The impact of medication on osseointegration and implant anchorage in bone determined using removal torque-A review10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10844 ↗
15. A guideline of selecting and reporting Intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 ↗
16. Systemic sclerostin antibody treatment increases osseointegration and biomechanical competence of zoledronic-acid-coated dental implants in a rat osteoporosis model10.22203/eCM.v037a20 ↗
17. Mechanically induced periprosthetic osteolysis: a systematic review10.1007/s11420-018-9641-5 ↗
18. Losartan reverses impaired osseointegration in spontaneously hypertensive rats10.1111/clr.13376 ↗
19. Performance of modified anatomic plates is comparable to proximal femoral nail, dynamic hip screw and anatomic plates: finite element and biomechanical testing10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.014 ↗
20. Orthopaedic osseointegration: implantology and future directions10.1002/jor.24576 ↗
21. A comparison between micro-CT and histology for the evaluation of cortical bone: effect of polymethylmethacrylate embedding on structural parameters10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03573.x ↗
22. Osseointegration and biocompatibility of different metal implants-a comparative experimental investigation in sheep
23. Micro computed tomography and immunohistochemistry analysis of dental implant osseointegration in animal experimental model: a scoping review
24. Comparison of push-in versus pull-out tests on bone-implant interfaces of rabbit tibia dental implant healing model10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00357.x ↗
25. Osseointegration improves bone-implant interface of pedicle screws in the growing spine: a biomechanical and histological study using an in vivo immature porcine model10.1007/s00586-017-5062-2 ↗
26. Systemic and local ibandronate enhance screw fixation10.1016/j.orthres.2003.12.015 ↗
27. Biomechanical and biochemical analyses of the effects of propranolol on the osseointegration of implants10.1097/SCS.0000000000006959 ↗
28. Thalji · 2012
29. Stainless steel screws coated with bisphosphonates gave stronger fixation and more surrounding bone. Histomorphometry in rats10.1016/j.bone.2007.10.013 ↗