journal article·2021-10-01Open access

Controlling Topography and Crystallinity of Melt Electrowritten Poly(ɛ-Caprolactone) Fibers

Carina Blum, Jan Weichhold, Gernot Hochleitner, Vladimir Stepanenko, Frank Würthner, Jürgen Groll, Tomasz Jungst

Abstract

Melt electrowriting (MEW) is an aspiring 3D printing technology with an unprecedented resolution among fiber-based printing technologies. It offers the ability to direct-write predefined designs utilizing a jet of molten polymer to fabricate constructs composed of fibers with diameters of only a few micrometers. These dimensions enable unique construct properties. Poly(ɛ-caprolactone) (PCL), a semicrystalline polymer mainly used for biomedical and life science applications, is the most prominent material for MEW and exhibits excellent printing properties. Despite the wealth of melt electrowritten constructs that have been fabricated by MEW, a detailed investigation, especially regarding fiber analysis on a macro- and microlevel is still lacking. Hence, this study systematically examines the influence of process parameters such as spinneret diameter, feeding pressure, and collector velocity on the diameter and particularly the topography of PCL fibers and sheds light on how these parameters affect the mechanical properties and crystallinity. A correlation between the mechanical properties, crystallite size, and roughness of the deposited fiber, depending on the collector velocity and applied feeding pressure, is revealed. These findings are used to print constructs composed of fibers with different microtopography without affecting the fiber diameter and thus the macroscopic assembly of the printed constructs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry at the Institute of Functional Materials and Biofabrication (IFB) University of Würzburg and KeyLab Polymers for Medicine of the Bavarian Polymer Institute (BPI), Würzburg, Germany.

Institut für Organische Chemie, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Center for Nanosystems Chemistry (CNC) & Bavarian Polymer Institute, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 1. Hutmacher DW, Woodfield TBF, Dalton PD. Chapter 10—Scaffold design and fabrication. In: C.A.V. Blitterswijk, J. De Boer (Eds.), Tissue Engineering. Oxford: Academic Press, 2014; pp.311–346.10.1016/B978-0-12-420145-3.00010-9 ↗
2. 10.1002/asia.20100043610.1002/asia.201000436 ↗
3. 10.1039/C2BM00039C10.1039/C2BM00039C ↗
4. 10.1089/ten.teb.2014.034710.1089/ten.teb.2014.0347 ↗
5. 10.1002/adhm.20180132610.1002/adhm.201801326 ↗
6. 10.1002/smll.20180023210.1002/smll.201800232 ↗
7. 10.1089/ten.tec.2018.037310.1089/ten.tec.2018.0373 ↗
8. 10.1038/ncomms793310.1038/ncomms7933 ↗
9. 10.1088/1758-5082/5/2/02500110.1088/1758-5082/5/2/025001 ↗
10. 10.1088/1758-5090/aaaf5010.1088/1758-5090/aaaf50 ↗
11. 10.1002/adhm.20170031110.1002/adhm.201700311 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20190598710.1002/adfm.201905987 ↗
13. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab5f4e10.1088/1758-5090/ab5f4e ↗
14. 14. Kalaskar DM, Alshomer F. Chapter 8—Micro- and nanotopographical cues guiding biomaterial host response. In: S.J. Lee, J.J. Yoo, A. Atala (Eds.), In Situ Tissue Regeneration. Boston: Academic Press, 2016; pp. 137–163.10.1016/B978-0-12-802225-2.00008-8 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20190466410.1002/adfm.201904664 ↗
16. 10.22203/eCM.v005a0110.22203/eCM.v005a01 ↗
17. 10.1088/1758-5090/7/3/03500210.1088/1758-5090/7/3/035002 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20110348210.1002/adma.201103482 ↗
19. 10.1116/1.491438010.1116/1.4914380 ↗
20. 10.1515/bnm-2015-002210.1515/bnm-2015-0022 ↗
21. 10.1063/1.361456010.1063/1.3614560 ↗
22. 10.1088/2053-1591/4/1/01530210.1088/2053-1591/4/1/015302 ↗
23. 10.1088/0960-1317/23/2/02501710.1088/0960-1317/23/2/025017 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.05310.1016/j.matdes.2018.03.053 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.02310.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.023 ↗
26. 10.1023/A:101797401692810.1023/A:1017974016928 ↗
27. 10.1021/ma034417b10.1021/ma034417b ↗
28. 10.1021/ma048635w10.1021/ma048635w ↗
29. 10.1089/ten.teb.2013.012510.1089/ten.teb.2013.0125 ↗
30. 10.3390/polym1101003410.3390/polym11010034 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.wear.2010.03.02910.1016/j.wear.2010.03.029 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10891510.1016/j.matdes.2020.108915 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10856-013-4905-610.1007/s10856-013-4905-6 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 ↗