journal article·2025-07

Boosting water-splitting efficiency: innovative CNTs-infused erbium selenide electrocatalyst for alkaline media

Muhammad Afaq, Sheraz Yousaf, Mohd Zahid Ansari, Abdullah Saad Alsubaie

Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (65)

Show source-provided references
1. P.M. Falcone, Sustainable energy policies in developing countries: a review of challenges and opportunities. Energies 16(18), 6682 (2023)10.3390/en16186682 ↗
2. D. Zheng et al., Essential features of weak current for excellent enhancement of NOx reduction over monoatomic V-based catalyst. Nat. Commun. 15(1), 6688 (2024)10.1038/s41467-024-51034-0 ↗
3. X. Yang et al., Upgrading cycling stability and capability of hybrid Na-CO2 batteries via tailoring reaction environment for efficient conversion CO2 to HCOOH. 14(16), 2304365 (2024)10.1002/aenm.202304365 ↗
4. S. Wang, A. Lu, C.-J. Zhong, Hydrogen production from water electrolysis: role of catalysts. Nano Convergence 8(1), 4 (2021)10.1186/s40580-021-00254-x ↗
5. M.F. Ahmad Kamaroddin et al., Membrane-based electrolysis for hydrogen production: a review. Membranes 11(11), 810 (2021)10.3390/membranes11110810 ↗
6. X. Xu et al., Electrochemical hydrogen storage materials: state-of-the-art and future perspectives. Energy Fuels 38(9), 7579–7613 (2024)10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c05138 ↗
7. A. Balčiūnaitė et al., Steps towards highly-efficient water splitting and oxygen reduction using nanostructured β-Ni (OH)2. RSC Adv. 12(16), 10020–10028 (2022)10.1039/D2RA00914E ↗
8. A. Raveendran, M. Chandran, R. Dhanusuraman, A comprehensive review on the electrochemical parameters and recent material development of electrochemical water splitting electrocatalysts. RSC Adv. 13(6), 3843–3876 (2023)10.1039/D2RA07642J ↗
9. P. Banoth, C. Kandula, P. Kollu, Introduction to electrocatalysts, in Noble Metal-Free Electrocatalysts: New Trends in Electrocatalysts for Energy Applications, vol. 2 (American Chemical Society, 2022), pp. 1–3710.1021/bk-2022-1432.ch001 ↗
10. Q. Wu et al., Boosting Electrocatalytic Performance via Electronic Structure Regulation for Acidic Oxygen Evolution (Iscience, 2024)10.1016/j.isci.2023.108738 ↗
11. Y. Wang et al., Investigation of oxygen evolution performance of highly efficient water electrolysis catalyst: NiFe LDH/BPene. Processes 11(7), 2179 (2023)10.3390/pr11072179 ↗
12. Y. He et al., Recent progress of manganese dioxide based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Industr. Chem. Mater. (2023)10.1039/D3IM00034F ↗
13. G.K. Gebremariam, A.Z. Jovanović, I.A. Pašti, The effect of electrolytes on the kinetics of the hydrogen evolution reaction. Hydrogen 4(4), 776–806 (2023)10.3390/hydrogen4040049 ↗
14. N. Wen et al., Electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction: mechanism, innovative strategies, and beyond. Mater. Chem. Front. 7(20), 4833–4864 (2023)10.1039/D3QM00423F ↗
15. C. Wang et al., Advances in engineering RuO2 electrocatalysts towards oxygen evolution reaction. Chin. Chem. Lett. 32(7), 2108–2116 (2021)10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.051 ↗
16. X. Xu et al., Effect of undercooling on microstructure evolution of Cu based alloys. J. Alloy. Compd. 935, 167998 (2023)10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167998 ↗
17. J. Zhao et al., Metal chalcogenides: an emerging material for electrocatalysis. APL Mater. 9(5) (2021)10.1063/5.0049772 ↗
18. P. Feng et al., Rare-earth-based chalcogenides and their derivatives: an encouraging IR nonlinear optical material candidate. Chem. Sci. 15(16), 5869–5896 (2024)10.1039/D4SC00697F ↗
19. A. Giri, G. Park, U. Jeong, Layer-structured anisotropic metal chalcogenides: recent advances in synthesis, modulation, and applications. Chem. Rev. 123(7), 3329–3442 (2023)10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00455 ↗
20. J. Zhang et al., Deep red PhOLED from dimeric salophen platinum(II) complexes. Dyes Pigm. 162, 590–598 (2019)10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.10.053 ↗
21. S.-L. Liu et al., Global rare earth elements projects: new developments and supply chains. Ore Geol. Rev. 157, 105428 (2023)10.1016/j.oregeorev.2023.105428 ↗
22. D. Monika, C. Iwona, Rare earth elements in new advanced engineering applications, in Rare Earth Elements, ed. by T.A. Michael (IntechOpen, Rijeka, 2022), Ch. 6
23. S.-S. Chai et al., Sustainability applications of rare earths from metallurgy, magnetism, catalysis, luminescence to future electrochemical pseudocapacitance energy storage. RSC Sustain. 1(1), 38–71 (2023)10.1039/D2SU00054G ↗
24. P. Söderlind et al., Ground-state properties of rare-earth metals: an evaluation of density-functional theory. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 26(41), 416001 (2014)10.1088/0953-8984/26/41/416001 ↗
25. X. Wang et al., Recent advances in rare-earth-based materials for electrocatalysis. Chem Catalysis 2(5), 967–1008 (2022)10.1016/j.checat.2022.02.007 ↗
26. L. Saviano et al., Catalytic activity of rare earth elements (REEs) in advanced oxidation processes of wastewater pollutants: a review. Molecules 28(17), 6185 (2023)10.3390/molecules28176185 ↗
27. A.I. Carim et al., Electrocatalysis of the hydrogen-evolution reaction by electrodeposited amorphous cobalt selenide films. J. Mater. Chem. A 2(34), 13835–13839 (2014)10.1039/C4TA02611J ↗
28. P. Thangasamy et al., Collectively exhaustive electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction of polymorphic cobalt selenides derived from organic surfactants modified Co-MOFs. Appl. Catal. B 325, 122367 (2023)10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.122367 ↗
29. P.F. Liu et al., Surface engineering of nickel selenide for an enhanced intrinsic overall water splitting ability. Mater. Chem. Front. 2(9), 1725–1731 (2018)10.1039/C8QM00292D ↗
30. X. Chen et al., Research advances in earth-abundant-element-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction and oxygen reduction reaction. Energy Mater. 3(4), 300031 (2023)
31. H. Lei et al., NiFe nanoparticles embedded N-doped carbon nanotubes as high-efficient electrocatalysts for wearable solid-state Zn-air batteries. Nano Energy 68, 104293 (2020)10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104293 ↗
32. P. Stelmachowski et al., Carbon-based composites as electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline media. Materials 14(17) (2021)10.3390/ma14174984 ↗
33. Z. Chen et al., Local coordination and electronic interactions of Pd/MXene via dual-atom codoping with superior durability for efficient electrocatalytic ethanol oxidation. 6(8), e443 (2024)10.1002/cey2.443 ↗
34. J.K. Kim et al., Rational design and synthesis of extremely efficient macroporous CoSe(2)-CNT composite microspheres for hydrogen evolution reaction. Small 13(27) (2017)10.1002/smll.201700068 ↗
35. B. Wang et al., Self-assembled CoSe(2)-FeSe(2) heteronanoparticles along the carbon nanotube network for boosted oxygen evolution reaction. Nanoscale 13(21), 9651–9658 (2021)10.1039/D1NR01092A ↗
36. M. Yuan et al., Tuning carbon nanotube-grafted core-shell-structured cobalt selenide@carbon hybrids for efficient oxygen evolution reaction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 533, 503–512 (2019)10.1016/j.jcis.2018.08.104 ↗
37. C.C. Hou et al., Ultrafine CoP nanoparticles supported on carbon nanotubes as highly active electrocatalyst for both oxygen and hydrogen evolution in basic media. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(51), 28412–28419 (2015)10.1021/acsami.5b09207 ↗
38. M. Afaq et al., Large-scale sonochemical fabrication of a Co3O4–CoFe2O4@ MWCNT bifunctional electrocatalyst for enhanced OER/HER performances. RSC Adv. 13(28), 19046–19057 (2023)10.1039/D3RA03117A ↗
39. M. Afaq et al., Fabrication of Ni2O2(OH)/CNTs-based electrocatalyst for efficient bifunctional electrocatalytic water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 60, 601–610 (2024)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.02.109 ↗
40. D.H. Manh et al., Determination of the crystalline size of hexagonal La(1−x)Sr(x)MnO(3) (x = 0.3) nanoparticles from X-ray diffraction—a comparative study. RSC Adv. 13(36), 25007–25017 (2023)10.1039/D3RA04018F ↗
41. A. Monshi, M.R. Foroughi, M.R. Monshi, Modified Scherrer equation to estimate more accurately nano-crystallite size using XRD. World J. Nano Sci. Eng. 2(3), 154–160 (2012)10.4236/wjnse.2012.23020 ↗
42. M. Kawsar et al., Synthesis of nano-crystallite hydroxyapatites in different media and a comparative study for estimation of crystallite size using Scherrer method, Halder-Wagner method size-strain plot, and Williamson-Hall model. Heliyon 10(3), e25347 (2024)10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25347 ↗
43. S. Sahu, P.K. Samanta, Microstructural study and crystallite size analysis of chemically grown bougainvillea flower-like zinc oxide nanostructures. Mater. Today Proc. 65, 2502–2505 (2022)10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.474 ↗
44. V. Sannasi et al., H2O2-assisted microwave synthesis of NiO/CNT nanocomposite material for supercapacitor applications. Ionics 26(8), 4067–4079 (2020)10.1007/s11581-020-03563-z ↗
45. B. Jansi Rani et al., CoNiSe2 nanostructures for clean energy production. ACS Omega 5(24), 14702–14710 (2020)10.1021/acsomega.0c01476 ↗
46. A. Kareem, S. Senthilkumar, Defect-induced FexNi1−xSe2 nanoparticles based electrocatalysts towards enhanced hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48(20), 7374–7384 (2023)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.079 ↗
47. Y. Li et al., MoS2 nanoparticles grown on graphene: an advanced catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133(19), 7296–7299 (2011)10.1021/ja201269b ↗
48. N. Pentland, J.O.M. Bockris, E. Sheldon, Hydrogen evolution reaction on copper, gold, molybdenum, palladium, rhodium, and iron: mechanism and measurement technique under high purity conditions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 104(3), 182 (1957)10.1149/1.2428530 ↗
49. B.E. Conway, B.V. Tilak, Interfacial processes involving electrocatalytic evolution and oxidation of H2, and the role of chemisorbed H. Electrochim. Acta 47(22), 3571–3594 (2002)10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00329-8 ↗
50. J. Masud et al., Cobalt selenide nanostructures: an efficient bifunctional catalyst with high current density at low coverage. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8(27), 17292–17302 (2016)10.1021/acsami.6b04862 ↗
51. J. Zhang et al., Self-supported porous NiSe2 nanowrinkles as efficient bifunctional electrocatalysts for overall water splitting. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6(2), 2231–2239 (2018)10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03657 ↗
52. J.-Y. Zhang et al., Rational design of cobalt–iron selenides for highly efficient electrochemical water oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(39), 33833–33840 (2017)10.1021/acsami.7b08917 ↗
53. W. Zhou et al., CoSe2 nanoparticles embedded defective carbon nanotubes derived from MOFs as efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Nano Energy 28, 143–150 (2016)10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.040 ↗
54. T. Liu, A.M. Asiri, X. Sun, Electrodeposited Co-doped NiSe2 nanoparticles film: a good electrocatalyst for efficient water splitting. Nanoscale 8(7), 3911–3915 (2016)10.1039/C5NR07170D ↗
55. Y.-R. Zheng et al., An efficient CeO2/CoSe2 nanobelt composite for electrochemical water oxidation. Small 11(2), 182–188 (2014)10.1002/smll.201401423 ↗
56. K. Premnath et al., Hydrothermally synthesized nickel molybdenum selenide composites as cost-effective and efficient trifunctional electrocatalysts for water splitting reactions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 44(41), 22796–22805 (2019)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.034 ↗
57. X. Cao, J.E. Medvedeva, M. Nath, Copper cobalt selenide as a high-efficiency bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting: combined experimental and theoretical study. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3(3), 3092–3103 (2020)10.1021/acsaem.0c00262 ↗
58. W. Li et al., Heterostructured CoSe2/FeSe2 nanoparticles with abundant vacancies and strong electronic coupling supported on carbon nanorods for oxygen evolution electrocatalysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8(11), 4658–4666 (2020)10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00839 ↗
59. Z. Chen et al., Three-dimensional flower-like bimetallic nickel-iron selenide for efficient oxygen evolution reaction. J. Phys. Chem. C 126(11), 5131–5137 (2022)10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c09962 ↗
60. J. Zhu, Y. Ni, Phase-controlled synthesis and the phase-dependent HER and OER performances of nickel selenide nanosheets prepared by an electrochemical deposition route. CrystEngComm 20(24), 3344–3352 (2018)10.1039/C8CE00381E ↗
61. Y.-Y. Sun et al., Ultra-thin NiFeSe nanosheets as a highly efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. Sustain. Energy Fuels 4(2), 582–588 (2020)10.1039/C9SE00905A ↗
62. A. Hameed et al., CoOx-NCNT-supported NiFe-selenide nanosheets as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for water splitting. Energy Fuels 38(1), 586–597 (2024)10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c03146 ↗
63. H. Singh et al., Multi-walled carbon nanotube supported manganese selenide as a highly active bifunctional OER and ORR electrocatalyst. J. Mater. Chem. A 10(12), 6772–6784 (2022)10.1039/D1TA09864K ↗
64. S. Poorahong et al., Free standing bimetallic nickel cobalt selenide nanosheets as three-dimensional electrocatalyst for water splitting. J. Electroanal. Chem. 897, 115568 (2021)10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115568 ↗
65. Z. Li et al., Ternary FeCoNi alloy nanoparticles embedded in N-doped carbon nanotubes for efficient oxygen evolution reaction electrocatalysis. Electrochim. Acta 339, 135886 (2020)10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135886 ↗