Facile synthesis of strontium selenide supported copper sulfide hybrid nanosheets as an efficient electrode for high-performance OER
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.
Source: Not provided · Quality: missing
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Advanced battery technologies research · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. A.W. Rennuit-Mortensen, K.D. Rasmussen, M. Grahn, How replacing fossil fuels with electrofuels could influence the demand for renewable energy and land area. Smart Energy 10, 100107 (2023)10.1016/j.segy.2023.100107 ↗
2. A. Zahoor et al., The carbon neutrality feasibility of worldwide and in China’s transportation sector by E-car and renewable energy sources before 2060. J. Energy Storage 61, 106696 (2023)10.1016/j.est.2023.106696 ↗
3. F.Z. Ainou, M. Ali, M. Sadiq, Green energy security assessment in Morocco: green finance as a step toward sustainable energy transition. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30(22), 61411–61429 (2023)10.1007/s11356-022-19153-7 ↗
4. W. Azam, I. Khan, S.A. Ali, Alternative energy and natural resources in determining environmental sustainability: a look at the role of government final consumption expenditures in France. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 30(1), 1949–1965 (2023)10.1007/s11356-022-22334-z ↗
5. S.S. Ali et al., Bioplastic production in terms of life cycle assessment: a state-of-the-art review. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 15, 100254 (2023)10.1016/j.ese.2023.100254 ↗
6. M.M. Rahman et al., Powering agriculture: present status, future potential, and challenges of renewable energy applications. Renew. Energy 188, 731–749 (2022)10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.065 ↗
7. A. Rahman, O. Farrok, M.M. Haque, Environmental impact of renewable energy source based electrical power plants: solar, wind, hydroelectric, biomass, geothermal, tidal, ocean, and osmotic. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 161, 112279 (2022)10.1016/j.rser.2022.112279 ↗
8. B. Roose et al., Local manufacturing of perovskite solar cells, a game-changer for low-and lower-middle income countries? Energy Environ. Sci. 15(9), 3571–3582 (2022)10.1039/D2EE01343F ↗
9. U.S. Meda, Y.V. Rajyaguru, A. Pandey, Generation of green hydrogen using self-sustained regenerative fuel cells: opportunities and challenges. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48, 28289–28314 (2023)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.03.430 ↗
10. V.M. Avargani et al., A comprehensive review on hydrogen production and utilization in North America: prospects and challenges. Energy Convers. Manage. 269, 115927 (2022)10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115927 ↗
11. M. Gopinath, R. Marimuthu, A review on solar energy-based indirect water-splitting methods for hydrogen generation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47(89), 37742–37759 (2022)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.08.297 ↗
12. P. Pattanayak et al., Recent progress in perovskite transition metal oxide-based photocatalyst and photoelectrode materials for solar-driven water splitting. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 10, 108429 (2022)10.1016/j.jece.2022.108429 ↗
13. A.R. Fareza et al., Nanoscale metal oxides–2D materials heterostructures for photoelectrochemical water splitting—a review. J. Mater. Chem. A 10(16), 8656–8686 (2022)10.1039/D1TA10203F ↗
14. M. Nasser, H. Hassan, Assessment of hydrogen production from waste heat using hybrid systems of Rankine cycle with proton exchange membrane/solid oxide electrolyzer. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48(20), 7135–7153 (2023)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.187 ↗
15. Y. Wu et al., Recent progress in biomass-derived nanoelectrocatalysts for the sustainable energy development. Fuel 323, 124349 (2022)10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124349 ↗
16. A.P. Demchenko, Proton transfer reactions: from photochemistry to biochemistry and bioenergetics. BBA Adv. 3, 100085 (2023)10.1016/j.bbadva.2023.100085 ↗
17. H. Jing et al., Theory-oriented screening and discovery of advanced energy transformation materials in electrocatalysis. Adv. Powder Mater. 1(1), 100013 (2022)10.1016/j.apmate.2021.10.004 ↗
18. N.A. Kamaruzaman et al., Recent advances in transition metals-based materials as electrocatalysts for water splitting. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 18, 100187 (2023)10.1016/j.ijoes.2023.100187 ↗
19. M. Ďurovič, J. Hnát, K. Bouzek, Electrocatalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline and neutral media. A comparative review. J. Power. Sources 493, 229708 (2021)10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229708 ↗
20. E. Loni, A. Shokuhfar, M. Siadati, Cobalt-based electrocatalysts for water splitting: an overview. Catal. Surv. Asia 25, 114–147 (2021)10.1007/s10563-021-09329-5 ↗
21. X. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Fu, Recent advances in rechargeable Zn-based batteries. J. Power. Sources 493, 229677 (2021)10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.229677 ↗
22. M.U. Nisa et al., CdSe supported SnO2 nanocomposite with strongly hydrophilic surface for enhanced overall water splitting. Fuel 321, 124086 (2022)10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124086 ↗
23. A.G. Abid et al., Stainless steel supported NiS/CeS nanocomposite for significantly enhanced oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline media. J. Solid State Electrochem. 26(10), 2107–2118 (2022)10.1007/s10008-022-05202-1 ↗
24. Z. Chen et al., Controllable design of nanoworm-like nickel sulfides for efficient electrochemical water splitting in alkaline media. Mater. Today Energy 18, 100573 (2020)10.1016/j.mtener.2020.100573 ↗
25. A. Farhan et al., Transition-metal sulfides with excellent hydrogen and oxygen reactions: a mini-review. J. Solid State Chem. 329, 124445 (2023)10.1016/j.ijoes.2023.100187 ↗
26. S.K. Ramesh, V. Ganesan, J. Kim, FeSe2-CoSe2/CoSe2 yolk-shell nanoboxes as superior electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. Mater. Lett. 323, 132573 (2022)10.1016/j.matlet.2022.132573 ↗
27. K. Wang et al., Selenide/sulfide heterostructured NiCo2Se4/NiCoS4 for oxygen evolution reaction, hydrogen evolution reaction, water splitting and Zn-air batteries. Electrochim. Acta 368, 137584 (2021)10.1016/j.electacta.2020.137584 ↗
28. J. Yang et al., Metal-organic framework-derived FeS2/CoNiSe2 heterostructure nanosheets for highly-efficient oxygen evolution reaction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 578, 152016 (2022)10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.152016 ↗
29. A. Raveendran, M. Chandran, R. Dhanusuraman, A comprehensive review on the electrochemical parameters and recent material development of electrochemical water splitting electrocatalysts. RSC Adv. 13(6), 3843–3876 (2023)10.1039/D2RA07642J ↗
30. J. Li et al., Optimizing hydrogen production by alkaline water decomposition with transition metal-based electrocatalysts. Environ. Chem. Lett. 31, 2583–2617 (2023)10.1007/s10311-023-01616-z ↗
31. X. Guan et al., Probing the national development from heavy metals contamination in river sediments. J. Clean. Prod. 419, 138164 (2023)10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138164 ↗
32. S. Vignesh, H. Kim, Influence of molybdenum on Co3O4 coupled N-doped reduced graphene oxide composite for improved electrocatalytic alkaline oxygen evolution reaction: stability and mechanism insights. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48, 37234–37247 (2023)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.146 ↗
33. X. Yang et al., Heterogeneous ultra-thin FeCo-LDH@ Co (OH) 2 nanosheets facilitated electrons transfer for oxygen evolution reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 472, 145076 (2023)10.1016/j.cej.2023.145076 ↗
34. G. Calzaferri et al., Multiple equilibria description of type H1 hysteresis in gas sorption isotherms of mesoporous materials. Mater. Chem. Phys. 296, 127121 (2023)10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.127121 ↗
35. Y. Wang et al., Investigation of photo (electro) catalytic water splitting to evolve H2 on Pt-g-C3N4 nanosheets. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47(65), 28007–28018 (2022)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.06.139 ↗
36. J. Jiang et al., Superwetting molybdenum-based sulfide/phosphide heterostructures for efficient water electrolysis and solar thermoelectricity self-powered hydrogen production. Appl. Surf. Sci. 631, 157482 (2023)10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157482 ↗
37. H. Tong, Y. Jiang, L. Xia, Enhancing photoelectrochemical water oxidation activity of BiVO4 photoanode through the Co-catalytic effect of Ni (OH) 2 and carbon quantum dots. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48, 36694–36706 (2023)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.06.003 ↗
38. M. Liu et al., Construction of an electrode with hierarchical three-dimensional NiFe-oxyhydroxides by two-step electrodeposition for large-current oxygen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 51, 626–637 (2023)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.005 ↗
39. S. Bi et al., (Digital Presentation) The effects of sulfur-oxygen ratio at the heterogeneous interface on oxygen evolution reaction performance of Ni3S2@ Ni3Fe catalysts for alkaline water electrolysis. ECS Trans. 111(4), 97 (2023)10.1149/11104.0097ecst ↗
40. Y. Sun et al., Deep neural network based battery impedance spectrum prediction using only impedance at characteristic frequencies. J. Power. Sources 580, 233414 (2023)10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233414 ↗
41. S. Feng, et al., Self-assembled heterojunction CoSe2@ CoO catalysts for efficient seawater electrolysis. Electrochim. Acta 463, 142870 (2023)10.1016/j.electacta.2023.142870 ↗
42. Y. Li et al., Effect of molybdenum phosphorus-based single/double-atom catalysts on hydrogen evolution reaction: first principles. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 51, 957–969 (2023)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.07.119 ↗
43. N. Chen et al., Facile fabrication of flower-like CuS/MnCO3 microspheres clusters on nickel foam as an efficient bifunctional catalyst for overall water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46(38), 19948–19961 (2021)10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.122 ↗
44. W. Li et al., Heterostructured CoSe2/FeSe2 nanoparticles with abundant vacancies and strong electronic coupling supported on carbon nanorods for oxygen evolution electrocatalysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 8(11), 4658–4666 (2020)10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00839 ↗
45. J.A. Rajesh et al., Bifunctional NiCo2Se4 and CoNi2Se4 nanostructures: efficient electrodes for battery-type supercapacitors and electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 79, 370–382 (2019)10.1016/j.jiec.2019.07.013 ↗
46. Y. Yang et al., An interfacial electron transfer on tetrahedral NiS2/NiSe2 heterocages with dual-phase synergy for efficiently triggering the oxygen evolution reaction. Small 16(1), 1905083 (2020)10.1002/smll.201905083 ↗
47. S. Ni et al., Interfacial engineering of the NiSe2/FeSe2 pp heterojunction for promoting oxygen evolution reaction and electrocatalytic urea oxidation. Appl. Catal. B 299, 120638 (2021)10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120638 ↗
48. O.A. Oyetade, R.J. Kriek, NiSe-Ni3Se2/multiwalled carbon nanotube composites as efficient electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline media. Electrocatalysis 11, 35–45 (2020)10.1007/s12678-019-00558-x ↗
49. R. Bose et al., Self-supportive bimetallic selenide heteronanostructures as high-efficiency electro (pre) catalysts for water oxidation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9(38), 13114–13123 (2021)10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05728 ↗
50. X. Zhao et al., Electrical and structural engineering of cobalt selenide nanosheets by Mn modulation for efficient oxygen evolution. Appl. Catal. B 236, 569–575 (2018)10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.05.054 ↗
51. G. Zhu et al., Nanocomposites based on CoSe2-decorated FeSe2 nanoparticles supported on reduced graphene oxide as high-performance electrocatalysts toward oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(22), 19258–19270 (2018)10.1021/acsami.8b04024 ↗
52. S. Sadiq et al., Synergistic modification of end groups in Quinoxaline fused core-based acceptor molecule to enhance its photovoltaic characteristics for superior organic solar cells. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 123, 108518 (2023)10.1016/j.jmgm.2023.108518 ↗