journal article·2016-07-31Open access

Minimization of Recombination Losses in 3D Nanostructured TiO2 Coated with Few Layered g-C3N4 for Extended Photo-response

Suhee Kang, Rajendra C. Pawar, Tae Joon Park, Jin Geum Kim, Sung-Hoon Ahn, Caroline Sunyong Lee

Abstract

We have successfully fabricated 3D (3-dimensional) nanostructures of TiO 2 coated with a g-C 3 N 4 layer via hydrothermal and sintering methods to enhance photoelectrochemical (PEC) performance. Due to the coupling of TiO 2 and g-C 3 N 4 , the nanostructures exhibited good performance as the higher conduction band of g-C 3 N 4 , which can be combined with TiO 2 . To fabricate 3D nanostructures of g-C 3 N 4 /TiO 2 , TiO 2 was first grown as a double layer structure on FTO (Fluorine-doped tin oxide) substrate at 150 o C for 3 h. After this, the g-C 3 N 4 layer was coated on the TiO 2 film at 520 o C for 4 h. As-prepared samples were varied according to loading of melamine powder, with values of loading of 0.25 g, 0.5 g, 0.75 g, and 1 g. From SEM and TEM analysis, it was possible to clearly observe the 3D sample morphologies. From the PEC measurement, 0.5 g of g-C 3 N 4 /TiO 2 film was found to exhibit the highest current density of 0.12 mA/cm 2 , along with a long-term stability of 5 h. Compared to the pristine TiO 2 , and to the 0.25 g, 0.75 g, and 1 g g-C 3 N 4 /TiO 2 films, the 0.5 g of g-C 3 N 4 /TiO 2 sample was coated with a thin g-C 3 N 4 layer that caused separation of the electrons and the holes; this led to a decreasing recombination. This unique structure can be used in photoelectrochemical applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Ga2O3 and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Adv. Energy Mater. · 2016 · 6 · 1
2. Catal. Sci. Technol. · 2015 · 5 · 133710.1039/C5CY90011E ↗
3. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 469-470 · 7910.1016/j.chemphys.2016.02.007 ↗
4. Plasma Process Polym. · 2106 · 13 · 191
5. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2016 · 18 · 1025510.1039/C6CP00353B ↗
6. Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 483010.1039/c3nr05271k ↗
7. Small · 2016 · 12 · 318110.1002/smll.201600534 ↗
8. Anal. Chem. · 2016 · 88 · 339210.1021/acs.analchem.6b00144 ↗
9. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 608210.1021/acsami.6b00030 ↗
10. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. · 2016 · 53 · 5610.4191/kcers.2016.53.1.56 ↗
11. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 1644910.1021/am502925j ↗
12. Scientific Reports · 2013 · 3 · 1
13. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. · 2015 · 54 · 1286810.1002/anie.201501788 ↗
14. Diamond Relat. Mater. · 2013 · 38 · 10910.1016/j.diamond.2013.06.012 ↗
15. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 1139210.1021/am403653a ↗
16. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 2028310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05427 ↗
17. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2015 · 17 · 1740610.1039/C5CP02554K ↗
18. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2015 · 7 · 902310.1021/am508505n ↗
19. Catal. Sci. Technol. · 2014 · 4 · 200610.1039/c4cy00226a ↗
20. Nanoscale · 2013 · 5 · 900110.1039/c3nr02766j ↗
21. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2011 · 3 · 228110.1021/am2006433 ↗