journal article·2023-11-01Open access

Modeling Strategies Based on Multiple Neural Network Systems Applied for a Monopolar and Bipolar Electrocoagulation

Ciprian George Piuleac, Kazem Godini, Yousef Rahimi, Reza Zarei, Ghasem Azarian

Abstract

The objective of this research was to evaluate the efficiency of an electrocoagulation system using iron and aluminum electrodes, arranged in both monopolar and bipolar arrangements, for the removal of acid red 18 dye. Experimental and modeling approaches were employed to investigate the system’s performance. The effects of operating parameters: including initial pH (3–9), current density (0.4–5.6 mA cm−2), charge passed (2.16–21.6 C cm−2), and initial dye concentration (50–300 mg l−1) were studied. The results demonstrated that an increase in electric current intensity and passed charge enhanced the removal of COD and dye. However, to minimize energy consumption, these parameters were optimized for different dye concentrations. The monopolar arrangement exhibited favorable performance for the both electrodes, primarily due to reduced ohmic drop effect, although the iron electrode generated sludge with better settling characteristics. The monopolar iron electrode consumed the least energy (38.3 kWh kg−1 COD). Experimental evaluation was conducted to assess the influence of key electrolysis process parameters on dye and COD removal. Additionally, neural network models, employing radial basis function and multilayer perceptron approaches, were utilized to predict system outputs based on initial characteristics (COD and dye) and operation conditions. The neural network models provided accurate predictions, offering practical insights for experimental applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced oxidation water treatment · Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis · Hydrological Forecasting Using AI

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. Da Silva · Chem. Eng. J. · 2013 · 233 · 4710.1016/j.cej.2013.08.023 ↗
2. Zheng · Chemosphere · 2007 · 68 · 114310.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.052 ↗
3. Karbul · J. Adv. Environ. Health Res. · 2022 · 10 · 14910.32598/JAEHR.10.2.1246 ↗
4. Zodi · Sep. Purif. Technol. · 2013 · 108 · 21510.1016/j.seppur.2013.01.052 ↗
5. Li · J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. · 2014 · 394 · 10510.1016/j.molcata.2014.03.014 ↗
6. Hisada · J. Environ. Chem. Eng. · 2019 · 710.1016/j.jece.2019.103157 ↗
7. Koupaie · Bioresour. Technol. · 2013 · 127 · 41510.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.003 ↗
8. Vasudevan · J. Environ. Sci. Eng. · 2011 · 53 · 349
9. Yang · 2011 · p. 3015
10. Barbusinski · Pol. J. Environ. Stud. · 2003 · 12 · 151
11. Song · Dyes Pigm. · 2010 · 87 · 3910.1016/j.dyepig.2010.02.001 ↗
12. Rahmani · Korean J. Chem. Eng. · 2016 · 33 · 53210.1007/s11814-015-0175-y ↗
13. Khandegar · J. Environ. Manage. · 2013 · 128 · 94910.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.043 ↗
14. Electrocoagulation Process Efficiency for Removing Effluent Pollution Caused by Drilling of Oil Rigs10.34172/JAEHR.2023.14 ↗
15. Calvo · Environ. Prog. · 2003 · 22 · 5710.1002/ep.670220117 ↗
16. Kobya · J. Environ. Chem. Eng. · 2020 · 810.1016/j.jece.2019.103526 ↗
17. Ehsani · J. Environ. Chem. Eng. · 2020 · 810.1016/j.jece.2020.104263 ↗
18. Pajootan · J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. · 2012 · 43 · 28210.1016/j.jtice.2011.10.014 ↗
19. El-Ashtoukhy · J. Hazard. Mater. · 2010 · 179 · 11310.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.02.066 ↗
20. Phalakornkule · J. Environ. Manage. · 2010 · 91 · 91810.1016/j.jenvman.2009.11.008 ↗
21. Maier · Environ. Model. Softw. · 2010 · 25 · 89110.1016/j.envsoft.2010.02.003 ↗
22. Oong · Appl. Soft. Comput. · 2012 · 12 · 130310.1016/j.asoc.2011.12.004 ↗
23. Wang · J. Guid. Control Dyn. · 2022 · 45 · 161410.2514/1.G006666 ↗
24. Xi · Appl. Energy · 2022 · 30510.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117962 ↗
25. Asrav · Comput. Chem. Eng. · 2023 · 17310.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108195 ↗
26. Sharma · AlChE J. · 2022 · 6810.1002/aic.17609 ↗
27. Schweidtmann · Chem. Ing. Tech. · 2021 · 93 · 202910.1002/cite.202100083 ↗
28. Azarian · Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy · 2018 · 37 · 63710.1002/ep.12711 ↗
29. A. American Public Health · 2012
30. Balestrassi · Neurocomputing · 2009 · 72 · 116010.1016/j.neucom.2008.02.002 ↗
31. Piuleac · Environ. Model. Softw. · 2010 · 25 · 7410.1016/j.envsoft.2009.07.012 ↗
32. Günay · Chem. Eng. Res. Des. · 2013 · 91 · 87410.1016/j.cherd.2012.08.017 ↗
33. Bates · J. Oper. Res. Soc. · 1969 · 20 · 45110.1057/jors.1969.103 ↗
34. Curteanu · Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2014 · 39 · 403710.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.118 ↗
35. Herrera · Comput. Chem. Eng. · 2009 · 33 · 159310.1016/j.compchemeng.2009.01.009 ↗
36. Multi-objective optimization of a stacked neural network used in modeling of an electrolysis process10.30638/eemj.2012.206 ↗
37. Piuleac · Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. · 2012 · 7 · 628910.1016/S1452-3981(23)19481-8 ↗
38. Llanos · Water Res. · 2014 · 53 · 32910.1016/j.watres.2014.01.041 ↗
39. Azarian · Process Safety Environ. Prot. · 2018 · 119 · 9610.1016/j.psep.2018.07.025 ↗
40. Pourghobadi · J. Electroanal. Chem. · 2020 · 86610.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114180 ↗
41. Chafi · Desalination · 2011 · 281 · 28510.1016/j.desal.2011.08.004 ↗
42. Pirkarami · J. Saudi Chem. Soc. · 2017 · 21 · S17910.1016/j.jscs.2013.12.008 ↗
43. Gevrey · Ecol. Modell. · 2003 · 160 · 24910.1016/S0304-3800(02)00257-0 ↗
44. Yayavaram · Administrative Sci. Quarterly · 2008 · 53 · 33310.2189/asqu.53.2.333 ↗
45. Rahmani · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2018 · 165 · E12110.1149/2.0201803jes ↗
46. Rahmani · Chemosphere · 2021 · 26310.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127761 ↗