journal article·2023-12-01Open access

Finding Ideal Parameters for Recycled Material Fused Particle Fabrication-Based 3D Printing Using an Open Source Software Implementation of Particle Swarm Optimization

Shane Oberloier, Nicholas G. Whisman, Joshua M. Pearce

Abstract

As additive manufacturing rapidly expands the number of materials including waste plastics and composites, there is an urgent need to reduce the experimental time needed to identify optimized printing parameters for novel materials. Computational intelligence (CI) in general and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms in particular have been shown to accelerate finding optimal printing parameters. Unfortunately, the implementation of CI has been prohibitively complex for noncomputer scientists. To overcome these limitations, this article develops, tests, and validates PSO Experimenter, an easy-to-use open-source platform based around the PSO algorithm and applies it to optimizing recycled materials. Specifically, PSO Experimenter is used to find optimal printing parameters for a relatively unexplored potential distributed recycling and additive manufacturing (DRAM) material that is widely available: low-density polyethylene (LDPE). LDPE has been used to make filament, but in this study for the first time it was used in the open source fused particle fabrication/fused granular fabrication system. PSO Experimenter successfully identified functional printing parameters for this challenging-to-print waste plastic. The results indicate that PSO Experimenter can provide 97% reduction in research time for 3D printing parameter optimization. It is concluded that the PSO Experimenter is a user-friendly and effective free software for finding ideal parameters for the burgeoning challenge of DRAM as well as a wide range of other fields and processes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Injection Molding Process and Properties · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, Michigan, USA.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Ivey School of Business, Western University, London, Canada.

References (76)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ohx.2021.e0018610.1016/j.ohx.2021.e00186 ↗
2. 10.1371/journal.pone.019489010.1371/journal.pone.0194890 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.00410.1016/j.apmt.2017.02.004 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10098810.1016/j.addma.2019.100988 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apmt.2021.10094910.1016/j.apmt.2021.100949 ↗
6. 10.1089/3dp.2018.008810.1089/3dp.2018.0088 ↗
7. 10.1080/10408398.2018.148182310.1080/10408398.2018.1481823 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.02.00410.1016/j.resconrec.2015.02.004 ↗
9. Sanchez FAC Lanza S Boudaoud H et al. Polymer Recycling and Additive Manufacturing in an Open Source Context: Optimization of Processes and Methods; Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium ISSF. 2015 Aug 2015 Austin TX United States. pp. 1591–1600.
10. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.05.01310.1016/j.addma.2017.05.013 ↗
11. 10.1089/3dp.2016.005410.1089/3dp.2016.0054 ↗
12. Pakkanen J Manfredi D Minetola P et al. About the use of recycled or biodegradable filaments for sustainability of 3D Printing. In: Sustainable Design and Manufacturing 2017. (Campana G Howlett RJ Setchi R et al. eds). Cham: Smart Innovation Systems and Technologies Springer International Publishing 2017; pp.776–785.10.1007/978-3-319-57078-5_73 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.02310.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.023 ↗
14. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0236810.1021/acssuschemeng.9b02368 ↗
15. Mohammed MI Wilson D Gomez-Kervin E et al. The Recycling of E-Waste ABS Plastics by Melt Extrusion and 3D Printing Using Solar Powered Devices as a Transformative Tool for Humanitarian Aid. University of Texas at Austin 2018.
16. Mohammed MI, , Wilson D, , Gomez-Kervin E, et al. EcoPrinting: Investigation of solar powered plastic recycling and additive manufacturing for enhanced waste management and sustainable manufacturing. In: 2018 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability (SusTech),, 2018; pp.1–6. DOI:10.1109/SusTech.2018.8671370
17. 10.1016/S0141-3910(03)00107-110.1016/S0141-3910(03)00107-1 ↗
18. 10.1108/1355254131130297810.1108/13552541311302978 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10924-016-0793-410.1007/s10924-016-0793-4 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11837-018-3040-810.1007/s11837-018-3040-8 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.01.01210.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.01.012 ↗
22. 10.3390/technologies504007110.3390/technologies5040071 ↗
23. 10.1002/app.3850210.1002/app.38502 ↗
24. Little HA, , Tanikella NG J. Reich M, et al. Towards distributed recycling with additive manufacturing of PET Flake Feedstocks. Materials, 2020; 13:4273.
25. 10.3390/ma1210164210.3390/ma12101642 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ohx.2018.e0002610.1016/j.ohx.2018.e00026 ↗
27. Pavlo S, , Fabio C, , Hakim B, et al. 3D-printing based distributed plastic recycling: A conceptual model for closed-loop supply chain design. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC),, 2018; pp.1–8. DOI: 10.1109/ICE.2018.8436296
28. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12160210.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121602 ↗
29. Gwamuri J, , Wittbrodt BT, , Anzalone NC, et al. Reversing the trend of large scale and centralization in manufacturing: The case of distributed manufacturing of customizable 3-D-printable self-adjustable glasses. Chall Sustain, 2014; 2:30–40.
30. 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.06.00210.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.06.002 ↗
31. 10.3390/technologies501000710.3390/technologies5010007 ↗
32. 10.3390/technologies503004510.3390/technologies5030045 ↗
33. 10.1057/jibs.2015.4710.1057/jibs.2015.47 ↗
34. 10.1557/opl.2013.25810.1557/opl.2013.258 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.00910.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.009 ↗
36. 10.3390/recycling202001010.3390/recycling2020010 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.13910.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.139 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.08810.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.088 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.10.03110.1016/j.addma.2018.10.031 ↗
40. 10.13073/FPJ-D-17-0004210.13073/FPJ-D-17-00042 ↗
41. Zander NE. Recycled polymer feedstocks for material extrusion additive manufacturing. In: Polymer-Based Additive Manufacturing: Recent Developments. ACS Symposium Series 1315 American Chemical Society,, 2019; pp.37–51. DOI:10.1021/bk-2019-1315.ch003
42. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10481010.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104810 ↗
43. Meyer TK, , Tanikella NG, , Reich MJ, et al. Potential of distributed recycling from hybrid manufacturing of 3-D printing and injection molding of stamp sand and acrylonitrile styrene acrylate waste composite. Sustain Mater Technol, 2020; 25:e00169.
44. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.11.00910.1016/j.addma.2018.11.009 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.00210.1016/j.mattod.2018.02.002 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.addma.2020.10106910.1016/j.addma.2020.101069 ↗
47. 10.3390/ma1108141310.3390/ma11081413 ↗
48. 10.1089/3dp.2019.019510.1089/3dp.2019.0195 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.03.00610.1016/j.addma.2019.03.006 ↗
50. Nilsiam Y, , Sanders P, , Pearce JM. Slicer and process improvements for open-source GMAW-Based Metal 3-D Printing. Addit Manuf, 2017; 18:110–120.
51. Keller JM Liu D Fogel DB. Fundamentals of Computational Intelligence: Neural Networks Fuzzy Systems and Evolutionary Computation. Hoboken New Jersey United States John Wiley & Sons 2016.
52. 10.1007/s00170-019-04568-310.1007/s00170-019-04568-3 ↗
53. Oberloier S. PSO Experimenter 2021. https://osf.io/muevs/ (accessed July22 2021).
54. Hart KR, , Frketic JB, , Brown JR. Recycling Meal-Ready-to-Eat (MRE) pouches into polymer filament for material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf, 2018; 21:536–543.
55. Re3D. Gigabot X Update—Re:3D | Life-Sized Affordable 3D Printing. https://re3d.org/gigabotx-update/ (accessed July7 2021).
56. Banks A, , Vincent J, , Anyakoha C. A review of particle swarm optimization. Part I: Background and development. Nat Comput, 2007; 6:467–484.
57. 10.1007/s00500-016-2474-610.1007/s00500-016-2474-6 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.00510.1016/j.addma.2017.03.005 ↗
59. 10.32614/RJ-2017-00410.32614/RJ-2017-004 ↗
60. Filaments.ca. LLDPE Filament—Natural—1.75mm—1KG Filaments.Ca. 2021. https://filaments.ca/products/lldpe-filament-natural-1-75mm (accessed October26 2021).
61. Amazon.com: Amazon Basics PETG 3D Printer Filament 1.75mm Black 1 kg Spool: Industrial & Scientific. 2021. https://www.amazon.com//dp/B07T4X4D2C/ (accessed November13 2021).
62. Amazon.com: DOITOOL Plastic Stool Childrens Stool Household Stool Anti- Slip Seat Stool Chair for Living Room Study Room Bathroom: Home & Kitchen. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B091GMYGTR/ (accessed October25 2021).
63. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.10453110.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104531 ↗
64. 10.1108/RPJ-09-2018-025210.1108/RPJ-09-2018-0252 ↗
65. 10.1115/1.404353010.1115/1.4043530 ↗
66. 10.1007/s12008-019-00637-910.1007/s12008-019-00637-9 ↗
67. 10.3390/inventions303006410.3390/inventions3030064 ↗
68. 10.3390/jmmp201001810.3390/jmmp2010018 ↗
69. Leon-Garcia A. Probability Statistics and Random Processes for Electrical Engineering. Hoboken New Jersey United States Prentice Hall 2008.
70. Shirke A Choudhari C Rukhande S. Parametric optimization of fused deposition modelling (FDM) process using PSO Algorithm. In International Conference on Advances in Thermal Systems Materials and Design Engineering (ATSMDE2017) Elsevier Netherlands. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.310197810.2139/ssrn.3101978 ↗
71. 10.5334/jors.7810.5334/jors.78 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.10564010.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105640 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.02110.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.021 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10490710.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104907 ↗
75. 10.3390/inventions503002610.3390/inventions5030026 ↗
76. 10.1007/s00170-021-07365-z10.1007/s00170-021-07365-z ↗