journal article·2025-08-01Open access

Three-Dimensionally Printed Hierarchal Sand Structures for Space Heating Applications

Bharath Seshadri, Demetris Shammas, Illias Hischier, Matthias Leschok, Kunal Masania, Benjamin Dillenburger, Arno Schlüter

Abstract

In addition to the well-documented resource efficiency and geometrical freedom, Digital Fabrication (DFAB) revolutionizes architecture by integrating functionalities into building elements, unlocking untapped potential from the micro- to the macroscales. This study uses binder-jet printed sand for a DFAB prototype—Fireplace2—tailored for indoor heating. Named after its traditional counterpart, Fireplace2 showcases DFAB’s prowess in crafting precise microclimates for heightened thermal comfort. Our research, tuning mechanical and thermal properties across micro and meso scales, illustrates DFAB's utility in architects' hands for crafting tailored microclimates. This approach manipulates the effective thermal conductivity and macroscale topology for stability against toppling (0.8 kN). A vertical infill porosity gradient establishes a surface temperature gradient, countering ventilation-induced thermal gradients. With a minimal operational temperature vertical gradient (+0.2°C), complying with international comfort standards (Predicted Mean Vote −0.23, People Dissatisfied 6%), Fireplace2 stands testament to DFAB’s microclimate-shaping capabilities despite challenges like foot-level ventilation. The study propels DFAB into a sustainable paradigm, aligning occupant comfort with environmental consciousness, thereby fostering more efficient and enjoyable indoor spaces.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Building materials and conservation · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Architecture and Building Systems, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Digital Building Technologies, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Shaping Matter Laboratory, Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Delft, The Netherlands.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Kolarevic B. Digital fabrication manufacturing architecture in the information age. Buffalo (New York) USA; 2001; pp. 10–12; doi: 10.52842/conf.acadia.2001.01010.52842/conf.acadia.2001.010 ↗
2. Iwamoto L. DIgital Fabrications: Architectural and Material Techniques. Princeton Architectural Press; 2013.
3. 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.00510.1016/j.autcon.2016.04.005 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.02610.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.026 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10089410.1016/j.addma.2019.100894 ↗
6. 10.3389/fbuil.2018.0008510.3389/fbuil.2018.00085 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.rser.2021.11079410.1016/j.rser.2021.110794 ↗
8. 10.3390/buildings1207102310.3390/buildings12071023 ↗
9. 10.1108/RPJ-12-2014-017210.1108/RPJ-12-2014-0172 ↗
10. 10.1088/1742-6596/2042/1/01218010.1088/1742-6596/2042/1/012180 ↗
11. Cruz PJS, , Figueiredo B, , Carvalho J, et al. Additive manufacturing of ceramic components for façade construction. Jfde, 2020; 8(1):1–20; doi: 10.7480/jfde.2020.1.4725
12. 10.1002/admt.20220120010.1002/admt.202201200 ↗
13. 10.1177/1351010X2098690110.1177/1351010X20986901 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2019.10708810.1016/j.apacoust.2019.107088 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.11010.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.110 ↗
16. Lydon G, , Hofer J, , Nagy Z, et al. Thermal Analysis of a Multifunctional Floor Element. Newcastle, United Kingdom; 2016.
17. 10.1089/3dp.2015.002210.1089/3dp.2015.0022 ↗
18. 10.3390/biomimetics702004410.3390/biomimetics7020044 ↗
19. Ozkan D Dade-Robertson M Morrow R et al. Designing a Living Material Through Bio-Digital-Fabrication: Guiding the Growth of Fungi through a Robotic System. Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe): Brussels; 2021; pp. 77–84.10.52842/conf.ecaade.2021.1.077 ↗
20. Sachs EM Haggerty JS Cima MJ et al. Three-Dimensional Printing Techniques. 1993.
21. McKenna N, , Singamneni S, , Diegel O, et al. QUT digital repository: Direct metal casting through 3D printing: A critical analysis of the mould characteristics. Global Congress on Manufacturing and Management, 2008; 12–14.
22. 10.1007/s40962-016-0082-y10.1007/s40962-016-0082-y ↗
23. Jipa A, , Barentin CC, , Lydon G, et al. 3D-Printed formwork for integrated funicular concrete slabs. Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia, 2019; 2019(6):1–8.
24. 10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_1110.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_11 ↗
25. 10.1089/3dp.2021.006710.1089/3dp.2021.0067 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.autcon.2019.10296410.1016/j.autcon.2019.102964 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.037 ↗
28. Shakor P, , Nejadi S, , Paul G, et al. Mechanical properties of cement-based materials and effect of elevated temperature on three-dimensional (3-D) printed mortar specimens in Inkjet 3-D printing. ACI Materials Journal; Farmington Hills, 2019; 116(2):55–67.
29. 10.1108/1355254071075089810.1108/13552540710750898 ↗
30. 10.1617/s11527-018-1148-510.1617/s11527-018-1148-5 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.10910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.109 ↗
32. 10.1108/RPJ-11-2020-028410.1108/RPJ-11-2020-0284 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10290910.1016/j.addma.2022.102909 ↗
34. 10.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_1610.1007/978-3-030-49916-7_16 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.measurement.2017.08.05110.1016/j.measurement.2017.08.051 ↗
36. Kaviany M. Principles of Heat Transfer in Porous Media. Springer Science & Business Media; 2012.
37. 10.1002/pat.485810.1002/pat.4858 ↗
38. 10.1163/15685510778232518610.1163/156855107782325186 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.55574910.1063/1.555749 ↗
40. European Commitiee for Standardlzation. B. E.C. 1–Actions on Structures–Part 1–1: General Actions–Densities Self-Weight Imposed Loads for Buildings. 2002.
41. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.10850210.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108502 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.10902010.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109020 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.10814610.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108146 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.rser.2020.11043610.1016/j.rser.2020.110436 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.enbenv.2020.05.00710.1016/j.enbenv.2020.05.007 ↗
46. ISO I. 7730: Ergonomics of the thermal environment Analytical determination and interpretation of thermal comfort using calculation of the PMV and PPD indices and local thermal comfort criteria. Management, 2005; 3(605):e615.
47. Butcher K, , Craig B. Guide A: Environmental Design. CIBSE. 2016.
48. European Committee for Standardization. EN 16798-1. Indoor environmental input parameters for design and assessment of energy performance of buildings addressing indoor air quality, thermal environment. Lighting and Acoustics, 2019.
49. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.02.01110.1016/j.enbuild.2007.02.011 ↗
50. American Society of Heating R, Engineers A-C. Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy: ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2017 (Supersedes ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2013) Includes ANSI/ASHRAE Addenda Listed in Appendix N. Ashrae, 2017.
51. 10.1007/s00421-009-1158-710.1007/s00421-009-1158-7 ↗
52. 10.1080/0014013860896824610.1080/00140138608968246 ↗
53. 10.1111/ina.1251210.1111/ina.12512 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.enbenv.2022.06.00210.1016/j.enbenv.2022.06.002 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.10883110.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108831 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2007.04.01110.1016/j.enbuild.2007.04.011 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.11009410.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110094 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.10638710.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106387 ↗
59. International Organisation for Standards. ISO 7726: Ergonomics of the Thermal Environment—Instruments for Measuring Physical Quantities. 2012.