journal article·1991-11

Effect of Interfacial Roughness on the Frictional Stress Measured Using Pushout Tests

Paul D. Jero, Ronald J. Kerans, Triplicane A. Parthasarathy

Publisher page

Abstract

A fiber which is partially pushed out of a surrounding matrix and subsequently pushed in the opposite direction exhibits a substantial decrease in sliding friction as it passes through its original position (its “origin”). This is manifest by a decrease in the load required to push the fiber. It is suggested that interfacial roughness causes this phenomenon and that the decrease in load (friction) is associated with the fiber seating back into its original position. The period of the drop has been correlated with the spatial extent of the interfacial surface roughness, and the magnitude of the drop (referred to hereafter as the seating drop) has been correlated with the amplitude of the interfacial roughness. Observation of the seating drop allows separation of the friction associated with interfacial irregularities from that resulting primarily from residual stresses at the interface. Implications for composite design and use are discussed. The effect of abrasion at the sliding interface is also addressed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. The Role of the Fiber‐Matrix Interface in Ceramic Composites
2. 10.1016/0001-6160(89)90291-510.1016/0001-6160(89)90291-5 ↗
3. 10.1557/PROC-194-26310.1557/PROC-194-263 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19690.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19690.x ↗
5. 10.1002/9780470320402.ch5110.1002/9780470320402.ch51 ↗
6. 10.1002/9780470310496.ch1110.1002/9780470310496.ch11 ↗
7. 10.1557/PROC-120-25310.1557/PROC-120-253 ↗
8. 10.1002/9780470310496.ch3710.1002/9780470310496.ch37 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.1988.tb00265.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.1988.tb00265.x ↗
10. 10.1002/9780470310557.ch4910.1002/9780470310557.ch49 ↗
11. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb06577.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb06577.x ↗
12. 10.1116/1.57701010.1116/1.577010 ↗
13. Mandell J. F. · 1980
14. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb05843.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb05843.x ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0094896210.1007/BF00948962 ↗
16. 10.1016/0956-7151(90)90145-710.1016/0956-7151(90)90145-7 ↗
17. 10.1016/0921-5093(90)90115-J10.1016/0921-5093(90)90115-J ↗
18. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07144.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07144.x ↗
19. 10.1007/BF0054954110.1007/BF00549541 ↗
20. 10.1088/0022-3727/6/17/31010.1088/0022-3727/6/17/310 ↗
21. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1986.tb07480.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1986.tb07480.x ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb05997.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb05997.x ↗
23. 10.1007/BF0072022110.1007/BF00720221 ↗
24. P. D.Jero “Interfacial Properties of SiC/Borosilicate Glass Systems by Indentation Pushout”; presented at the 92d Annual Meeting of the American Ceramic Society Dallas TX April 24 1990(Symposium on Ceramic Matrix Composites Paper No. G1‐SIV‐90).
25. 10.1016/0956-716X(90)90085-U10.1016/0956-716X(90)90085-U ↗
26. 10.1016/0956-716X(91)90095-I10.1016/0956-716X(91)90095-I ↗
27. 10.1016/0266-3538(90)90061-910.1016/0266-3538(90)90061-9 ↗
28. 10.1007/BF0114472310.1007/BF01144723 ↗
29. Kingery W. D. · 1976
30. 10.1002/9780470310496.ch2210.1002/9780470310496.ch22 ↗