Cyclic martensitic transformations and damage evolution in shape memory zirconia: Single crystals vs polycrystals
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In zirconia‐based shape memory ceramics (SMCs), cracking during the martensitic transformation can be avoided in structures that reduce the relative presence of grain boundaries where high levels of transformation mismatch stress develop. This approach has been well established in single crystals, but only for sample sizes below about 5 microns. In this paper, we extend the strategy of eliminating grain boundaries to bulk specimen scales by fabricating mm‐scale single crystal SMCs via cold crucible induction melting. For 1.5 and 2.0 mol% Y 2 O 3 ‐ZrO 2 , we study the cyclic martensitic transformation of both single crystal and polycrystal structures. Whereas single crystals have very repeatable transformation behavior in terms of hysteresis and strain amplitude, polycrystals degrade dramatically as they accumulate cracking damage with repeated cycling. As the polycrystal evolves from a pellet to granular packing of loose single crystals/grains, the energy dissipation converges with that of the single‐crystal structure, and the energy spent on cracking throughout that process is captured by calorimetry analysis. These results verify that grain boundaries play a key role in damage evolution during martensitic transformation and that microstructural control can extend the size‐scale of viable single crystal or oligocrystal SMCs from the micro‐ to the millimeter scale.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Nuclear materials and radiation effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge MA USA
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03278.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03278.x ↗
2. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01221.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01221.x ↗
3. 10.1002/pssa.221021010210.1002/pssa.2210210102 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb06383.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb06383.x ↗
5. 10.1038/258703a010.1038/258703a0 ↗
6. 10.1007/BF0055392810.1007/BF00553928 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.04210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.042 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.05310.1016/j.actamat.2014.07.053 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.10.04710.1016/j.actamat.2015.10.047 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb06734.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1990.tb06734.x ↗
11. 10.1126/science.123974510.1126/science.1239745 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matlet.2010.03.05210.1016/j.matlet.2010.03.052 ↗
13. 10.1051/jphyscol:1982413110.1051/jphyscol:19824131 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.481717010.1063/1.4817170 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.325737210.1063/1.3257372 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.05410.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.054 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.01.01310.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.01.013 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.04710.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.047 ↗
19. 10.1111/jace.1497210.1111/jace.14972 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.03210.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.03.032 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.05710.1016/j.actamat.2017.04.057 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.02810.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.028 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.03010.1016/j.actamat.2016.06.030 ↗
24. Kuzʹminov I · 2008
25. 10.1016/S1002-0721(08)60372-510.1016/S1002-0721(08)60372-5 ↗
26. 10.1007/978-3-540-74761-1_1410.1007/978-3-540-74761-1_14 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0110512110.1007/BF01105121 ↗
28. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19715.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19715.x ↗
29. Monoclinic‐tetragonal zirconia quantification of commercial nanopowder mixtures by XRD and DTA
30. 10.1007/s12034-014-0033-210.1007/s12034-014-0033-2 ↗
31. 10.1023/A:101795050635610.1023/A:1017950506356 ↗
32. 10.1007/978-3-319-19454-7_130-110.1007/978-3-319-19454-7_130-1 ↗
33. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19618.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1984.tb19618.x ↗
34. 10.1107/S002188986900721710.1107/S0021889869007217 ↗
35. 10.6028/jres.035.02810.6028/jres.035.028 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.01110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2014.03.011 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0955-2219(01)00286-210.1016/S0955-2219(01)00286-2 ↗
38. Otsuka K · 1998
39. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00315-410.1016/S1359-6454(02)00315-4 ↗
40. 10.1007/s11661-009-9958-210.1007/s11661-009-9958-2 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.msea.2013.02.03510.1016/j.msea.2013.02.035 ↗
42. 10.1016/S0921-5093(98)01095-810.1016/S0921-5093(98)01095-8 ↗
43. 10.1038/nature1253210.1038/nature12532 ↗
44. HautcoeurA FouchéF SicreJ.Cu‐Al‐Ni shape memory single crystal wires with high transformation temperature. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Aerospace Mechanisms Symposium; 2016 May 4‐6; Moffett field CA.Moffet field CA:NASA Ames Research Center;2016. p.185–91.
45. 10.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.03810.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.038 ↗
46. A review of shape memory stability in NiTi alloys
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.805010.1103/PhysRevB.58.8050 ↗
48. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07177.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07177.x ↗
49. 10.1016/S0022-5096(96)00074-910.1016/S0022-5096(96)00074-9 ↗