journal article·2018-03-01

Evaluating the Rutting Performance of Geosynthetic Reinforced Pavement Containing Rubberized Asphalt Mixtures

A. K. Khiavi, B. Bakhshi, V. Hojjat

Journal of Testing and Evaluation· Volume 46· Issue 2
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Asphalt-pavement rutting is one of the most commonly observed pavement distresses where crumb rubber could be used to decrease this distress. This research illustrates methods of improving the behavior of flexible pavements with a crumb-rubber modifier in asphalt mixtures and with geosynthetic reinforcement in pavements to protect against rutting. The scope of this research is to predict the rutting depth of pavements containing conventional asphalt with a geosynthetic layer using a 3D model an ABAQUS finite-element (FE) program, and compare that with the rutting depth of pavements containing rubberized asphalt. A dynamic creep test was performed on different specimens to obtain material parameters of low creep power. For each type, a model was developed and then the finite-element method was used to estimate the rut depth of a pavement structure by incorporating realistic material properties of a geosynthetic, asphalt mixture, and base, subbase, and subgrade layers. The results show that crumb rubber causes reduction in rut depth by 36 %. By conducting analytical finite-element modeling in ABAQUS, it found that using geosynthetic in the bottom of the first-, second-, third-, and fourth-quarter causes rut-depth reduction of 74 %, 68 %, 34 %, and 0.5 %, respectively. Therefore, using the geosynthetics on a pavement containing conventional asphalt mixtures is an effective way of decreasing the rut depth.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Dept. of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Zanjan 1 , Zanjan ,

Department of Civil Engineering, University of Zanjan 2 , Zanjan ,

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Evaluation of Rutting Depth in Flexible Pavements by Using Finite Element Analysis and Local Empirical Model10.3844/ajeassp.2012.163.169 ↗
2. On the Characterization of Flexible Pavement Rutting Using Creep Model-Based Finite Element Analysis10.1016/j.finel.2004.03.002 ↗
3. Zhang, Y., “Anisotropic Characterization of Asphalt Mixtures in Compression,” Ph.D. dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 2012.
4. Evaluating the Rutting Resistance of Asphalt Mixtures Using a Simplified Triaxial Repeated Load Test10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04 ↗
5. Estimation of the Rutting Performance of Polyethylene Terephthalate Modified Asphalt Mixtures by Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Methodology10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.043 ↗
6. Performance Evaluation of Rubberized and SBS Modified Porous Asphalt Mixtures10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.006 ↗
7. Evaluation of Permanent Deformation of Unmodified and SBS Modified Asphalt Mixtures Using Dynamic Creep Test10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.015 ↗
8. State-of-the Art Summary of Geosynthetic Interlayer Systems for Retarding the Reflective Cracking10.1007/s40098-015-0161-7 ↗
9. Evaluation of Permanent Deformation of Geogrid Reinforced Asphalt Concrete Using Dynamic Creep Test10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.06.003 ↗
10. 3D FE Analysis of Flexible Pavement with Geosynthetic Reinforcement10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132:5(402) ↗
11. Mechanistic-Empirical Analysis of the Results of Finite Element Analysis on Flexible Pavement with Geogrid Base Reinforcement10.1080/10298436.2012.752823 ↗
12. Gu, J., “Computational Modeling of Geogrid Reinforced Soil Foundation and Geogrid Reinforced Base in Flexible Pavement,” Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 2011.
13. Bohagr, A. A., “Finite Element Modeling of Geosynthetic Reinforced Pavement Subgrades, M. Sc. thesis, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 2013.
14. Application of Semi-Analytical Finite Element Method Coupled with Infinite Element for Analysis of Asphalt Pavement Structural Response10.1016/j.jtte.2015.01.005 ↗
15. Contributions of Pavement Layers to Rutting of Hot Mix Pavement
16. Laboratory Investigation of Dimensional Changes of Crumb Rubber Reacting with Asphalt Binder.
17. ASTM D1559
18. The Effect of Crumb Rubber Modifier (CRM) on the Performance Properties of Rubberized Binders in HMA Pavements
19. Rutting Performance of Rubberized Porous Asphalt Using Finite Element Method (FEM)10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.134 ↗
20. 2004
21. Numerical Approach of Visco-Elastoplastic Analysis for Asphalt Mixtures10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00139-4 ↗
22. 2008
23. Mechanistic Analysis of ST and SBS-Modified Flexible Pavements10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.023 ↗
24. ASTM D4123-82 · 1996
25. Studies Concerning the Use of Asphalt Rubber in Portugal
26. Numerical Modeling of Geosynthetic Reinforced Flexible Pavements
27. Investigation of the Effective Parameters on the Fatigue Behaviour of HMA Containing Waste Glass Cullet
28. Contributions of Pavement Structural Layers to Rutting of Hot Mix Asphalt Pavements
29. Cracked Asphalt Pavement Under Traffic Loading—A 3D Finite Element Analysis10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.12.013 ↗
30. Uzarowski, L., “The Development of Asphalt Mix Creep Parameters and Finite Element Modeling of Asphalt Rutting,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, 2006.
31. ASTM D5-73
32. ASTM D36-76 · 1976
33. ASTM D92-78 · 1978
34. ASTM D1754-78 · 1978
35. ASTM D113-79 · 1979
36. ASTM D70-76 · 1976