journal article·2019-05-01

Large-Scale and Bench-Scale Test Systems for Assessing Impact of Geogrids on Pavements Founded on Problematic Soils

Steven Williams, Jason Wright, Sangy S. Hanumasagar, S. Sonny Kim, J. David Frost

Journal of Testing and Evaluation· Volume 47· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Geogrid reinforcement is an economically viable alternative to achieve improved performance in highway pavement construction in regions with soft problematic subgrade soils. To examine the potential benefits of using geogrids in pavement foundations, measurement of permanent deformation using laboratory triaxial tests is typical practice. However, since the performance improvement of pavement foundation systems is achieved by distribution of vertical stresses at the reinforcing layer through the tensile properties of the geogrid material, it is desirable to conduct large-scale testing to more accurately monitor the behavior of the geogrid-reinforced aggregate and soil system. This article describes the development of laboratory large-scale and bench-scale pavement testing systems to evaluate the behavior of geogrid-reinforced pavement systems through wheel tests performed with problematic subgrade soils found in North Georgia. The large-scale test specimens are prepared in a 1.8 (6 ft) by 1.8 (6 ft) by 0.6 m (2 ft) metal box and consist of 305 mm (12 in.) of unbound aggregate base (UAB) overlying 305 mm (12 in.) of subgrade soil. Geogrid is placed at the interface between the subgrade soil and UAB layer. Pressure sensors are installed near the bottom of the UAB layer and near the top and bottom of the subgrade layer to monitor stress distributions within the pavement foundation system. The bench-scale system, which measures 914 (36 in.) by 203 (8 in.) by 152 mm (6 in.) is also described. This system is advantageous because not only does it expedite rapid testing but also allows for relative micro- and macroscale comparisons of aggregate-geogrid behavior. This article presents test results showing vertical stress variations obtained experimentally in the UAB and subgrade soils under simulated traffic tire loading. The two systems are shown to be effective in establishing the influence of geogrid reinforcement in pavement systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1 , Atlanta, GA 30092 ,

Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Georgia 2 , Athens, GA 30602 ,

School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology 3 , 790 Atlantic Dr., Atlanta, GA 30332 ,

Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Georgia 4 , 208 Driftmier Engineering Center (Annex), Athens, GA 30602 ,

References (12)

Show source-provided references
1. Bagshaw, S. A., Herrington, P. R., Kathirgamanathan, P., and Cook, S. R., “Geosynthetics in Basecourse Stablisation,” Report No. 574, NZ Transportation Agency, Wellington, New Zealand, 2015, 64p.
2. Barksdale, R. D., Brown, S. F., and Chan, F., “Potential Benefits of Geosynthetics in Flexible Pavement Systems,” Report No. 315, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 1989, 230p.
3. Laboratory Evaluation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Pavement Sections
4. Geogrid in Flexible Pavements: Validated Mechanism10.3141/2045-12 ↗
5. An Assessment of the Use of Geogrids in Unpaved Roads and Unpaved Areas
6. Assessment of Geogrids in Gravel Roads under Cyclic Loading10.1016/j.aej.2016.09.023 ↗
7. Lee, M. S., Choi, Y. S., and Prezzi, M., “Quality Assessment of Geogrids Used for Subgrade Treatment,” Report No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2012/27, Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation, West Lafayette, IN, 2012, 28p.10.5703/1288284315034 ↗
8. Guideline for Pavement Sections for Minor Projects
9. Geosynthetic Design and Construction Guidelines
10. Tensar International Corporation, “Product Specification Tensar Biaxial Geogrid,” Tensar International Corporation, 2013, https://archive.org/details/DTIC_ADA480571?q=tensar (accessed 25 Oct. 2017).
11. Berg, R. R., Christopher, B. R., and Perkins, S., “Geosynthetic Reinforcement of the Aggregate Base/Subbase Courses of Pavement Structures,” Report No. GMA White Paper II, Geosynthetic Materials Association, Roseville, MN, 2000, 190p.
12. ASTM D6951/D6951M-09, Standard Test Method for Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer in Shallow Pavement Applications, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2015, www.astm.org