journal article·2016-07-01

Effect of Electrical Surface Charge on Seal Coat Curing and Aggregate Loss Performance

Jusang Lee, Hyungjun Ahn

Journal of Testing and Evaluation· Volume 44· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This study presents quantifications of the electrical interactions between aggregates and emulsions using zeta potentials and evaluates the interaction influence on seal coat curing and aggregate loss performances. Three emulsions and seven aggregates consisting of CRS-2P, RS-2P, and AE-90S for emulsions and Trap Rock, Sandstone, Blast Furnace Slag, Steel Slag, Limestone, Dolomite, and Crushed Gravel were used for the zeta potential for electrostatic interaction, the water content test for the curing performance, and the sweep test for aggregate loss performance. All aggregates and emulsions showed positive zeta potentials at a low pH and negative zeta potentials at high pH with the exception of Blast Furnace Slag, which exhibited negative zeta potential values regardless of pH levels. This observation confirms that the zeta potential sensitively varies with the pH of solution. Conclusively, the electrical surface charge of an aggregate in emulsions varies with the type of emulsion. CRS-2P presented the fastest water evaporation among the three emulsions, which confirms that cationic emulsions show fast curing due to a negatively charged existing pavement surface, in general, like a felt disk used in this study. Another observation made from the water content test is that Limestone aggregate can slow down the water evaporation rate in CRS-2P. RS-2P and AE-90S show similar retardations, but they are statistically insignificant. It should be noted that there was no electrostatic attraction among the emulsions and Limestone based on the zeta potential test results. However, the electrostatic interaction between CRS-2P and Limestone has the smallest repulsion among Limestone with the emulsions. This study also showed that the electrostatic interaction and aggregate loss performance had a poor correlation (R2 = 0.3212), which may lead to a conclusion that repulsion and attraction between emulsion particle and aggregate particle does not significantly affect the aggregate loss performance of seal coat.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Indiana Department of Transportation 1 , Indianapolis, IN46204, US

Purdue Univ. 2 , West Lafayette, IN47907, US

References (16)

Show source-provided references
1. Chip Seal Best Practices
2. Mertens · 1959
3. Johnsson, A.-C. , 2011, “On the Electrolyte Induced Aggregation of Concentrated Silica Dispersions,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Gothenburg, Goteborg, Sweden.
4. Hefer · 2005
5. Zeta Potential Measurements on Bitumen Emulsions and Road Aggregates
6. Schuler · 201110.3141/2235-09 ↗
7. INDOT Standard Specifications. s.l. · 2010
8. ASTM D977-13e1 · 2014
9. ASTM D2397/D2397M-13 · 2013
10. BS EN 933-3:2012 · 2012
11. Malvern Instruments Ltd. · 2004
12. ASTM D6934-08 · 2008
13. ASTM D7000-11 · 2011
14. AASHTO T59 · 2013
15. Overview of Asphalt Emulsion
16. Texas Department of Trasportation, 2006, “Asphalt Emulsion,” ftp://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/cst/AsphaltEmulsions.pdf 04 Aug 2014.