Durability properties of fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete with natural and industrial waste mineral admixtures
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) and quarry rock dust (RD), both industrial and natural mineral wastes were used as binder materials in geopolymer concrete. The influence of these mineral admixtures on the concrete’s durability under aggressive environmental conditions was investigated. Steel, polyester, and hybrid fibers were incorporated at volume fractions of 0%, 0.25%, 0.50%, 0.75%, and 1.0% to further enhance durability performance. Freeze-thaw and sulfate resistance tests were carried out to evaluate the effects of fiber type and content on the durability behavior of the geopolymer concrete. The test results showed that the mineral waste-based binder system itself offered considerable durability while the addition of fibers significantly improved resistance to freeze-thaw cycles and sulfate attacks. Among all types, the geopolymer concrete with 0.5% polyester fiber exhibited the highest resistance to freeze-thaw while hybrid fiber usage provided a balanced enhancement across both test environments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Gümüşhane University
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Mehta PK, Monteiro PJ. Concrete: microstructure, properties, and materials. McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.
2. Erdogan ST, Erdogan TY. Basic materials of construction. Ankara-Turkey: METU Press Publishing Company; 2020.
3. Neville AM. Properties of concrete. Vol. 4. London: Longman; 1995.
4. 10.1021/es100771k10.1021/es100771k ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.00410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2012.01.004 ↗
6. Song XL, Yang JX, Liu JR. Environmental benefits assessment of blast furnace slag recycling for green building materials based on LCA. China Popul Resour Environ. 2012;22:51–54. (in Chinese).
7. McCaffrey R. Climate change and the cement ındustry, environmental overview. London, UK: GCL Magazine, Environmental Special Issue, Cement Trends; 2002.
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12833910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128339 ↗
9. Weerdt KD. Geopolymers—state of the art SINTEF building and infrastructure. 2001.
10. Thakur RN, Ghosh S. Effect of mix composition on compressive strength and microstructure of fly ash based geopolymer composites. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci. 2009;4(4):68–74.
11. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.01810.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10853-009-3934-510.1007/s10853-009-3934-5 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.10.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2012.10.004 ↗
14. Iimail I, Bernal SA, Provis JL, et al. Modification of phase evolution in alkaliactivated blast furnace slag by the incorporation of fly ash. Cem Concr Compos. 2013;45(1):125–135.
15. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.03.02510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2013.03.025 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00298-210.1016/S0008-8846(00)00298-2 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.08010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.13910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.139 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.00110.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.001 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2013.05.00110.1016/j.ijsbe.2013.05.001 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00003-810.1016/S0958-9465(01)00003-8 ↗
22. Van Deventer JSJ Feng D Duxson P. Dry mix cement composition methods and systems involving same. 2010.
23. 10.3390/ma611506910.3390/ma6115069 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b0055910.1021/acs.iecr.6b00559 ↗
25. Aydın S, Baradan B. High temperature resistance of alkali-activated slag and Portland cement-based reactive powder concrete. ACI Mater J. 2012;109.
26. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2018.04.004 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.13910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.139 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.10610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.106 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.08910.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.089 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.04.00410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.04.004 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.10.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.10.005 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.001 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.05310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.053 ↗
34. 10.1007/s12649-018-0213-110.1007/s12649-018-0213-1 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.07010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.070 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.07010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.070 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.15310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.153 ↗
38. Rashad AM. Properties of alkali-activated fly ash concrete blended with slag. Iran J Mater Sci Eng. 2013;10(1):57–64.
39. 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.01.01810.1016/j.fuel.2011.01.018 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.11010.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.08.110 ↗
41. 10.1680/adcr.1995.7.27.9310.1680/adcr.1995.7.27.93 ↗
42. Melo NA. Estudo da retraçao emargamassa com cimento de escoria ativada [master thesis]. Escola politecnica da Universidade de Sao Pablo; 2002.
43. 10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00203-810.1016/S0008-8846(98)00203-8 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00243-X10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00243-X ↗
45. Nindyawati B, Umniati, P, Risdanareni. Flexural test of fly ash bases geopolimer concrete beams. In Engineering technology international conference (ETIC 2016), MATEC Web Conf. 97. 2017. p. 01030.
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.02510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.025 ↗
47. Bentur A. Fiber-reinforced cementitious materials. In Material science concrete. Ohio: The American Ceramic Society; 1989.
48. Bentur A, Mindness S. Fibre reinforced cementitious composites. New York: Elsevier Applied Science; 1990.
49. Yao Y. The effects of fiber’s surface roughness on the mechanical properties of fiber reinforced polymer composites. J Compos Mater. 2013;43(23):0021998312459871.
50. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12674710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126747 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10768910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107689 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.006 ↗
53. Sengül O, Tasdemir C, Koruç S, et al. Effect of aggregate type on the freeze-thaw resistance of concrete. In: 3rd National Crushed Stone Symposium, 3–4 Turkey, Istanbul. 2003, p. 44–50. (In Turkish).
54. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.01910.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.019 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13285110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132851 ↗
56. 10.1002/suco.20190044110.1002/suco.201900441 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12433010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124330 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12524810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125248 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.13021810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130218 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13051710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130517 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.05710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.057 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12424610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124246 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.02210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.08.022 ↗
64. 10.3390/ma1208124710.3390/ma12081247 ↗
65. 10.24200/SCI.2017.422110.24200/SCI.2017.4221 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.05010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.050 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0139310.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01393 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.15310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.153 ↗
69. Kumar BSC, Ramesh K. Durability studies of GGBS and metakaolin based geopolymer concrete. Int J Civil Eng Technol. 2017;8(1):17–28.
70. 10.1002/suco.20190006110.1002/suco.201900061 ↗
71. 10.1080/14488353.2018.145071610.1080/14488353.2018.1450716 ↗
72. B. of Indian Standards IS 3812-1 (2033). Specification for pulverized fuel ash part 1: for use as pozzolana in cement cement mortar and concrete. 2013.
73. 10.3390/su14171063910.3390/su141710639 ↗
74. ACI Committee 544. Guide to design with fiber-reinforced concrete. Farmington Hills (MI): American Concrete Institute; 2018.
75. TS 10514. Mix proportions and rules for the manufacture of fiber-reinforced concrete. Ankara: TSE; 2015.
76. 10.1007/s12633-021-00950-710.1007/s12633-021-00950-7 ↗
77. 10.1007/s11356-022-10.1007/s11356-022- ↗
78. 10.3390/app1119919210.3390/app11199192 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.apt.2020.10.01110.1016/j.apt.2020.10.011 ↗
80. 10.3390/ma1422689010.3390/ma14226890 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.matlet.2018.07.13310.1016/j.matlet.2018.07.133 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11952510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119525 ↗
83. 10.1007/s40996-024-01465-y10.1007/s40996-024-01465-y ↗
84. TS 802. TS 802 design of concrete mixes. Ankara Turkey: Turkish Standard Institute; 2016.
85. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.08.06210.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2018.08.062 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.06110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.061 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12411310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124113 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11750210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117502 ↗
89. Nawar ALI, Canpolat O, Mukhallad M, et al. Effect of using colemanite and basalt fiber on the mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer mortars. J Sustain Constr Mater Technol. n.d.;3:235–241.
90. Bas M, Sürücü C, Fenerl˙ I K, et al. Effect of fiber type, shape and volume fraction on mechanical and flexural properties of concrete. J Sustain Constr Mater Technol. n.d.;7:158–171.
91. 10.2139/ssrn.418927810.2139/ssrn.4189278 ↗
92. Hakan B, Mustafa Ç. 2016. The effects of synthetic and steel fibers admixtures to the abrasion resistance of normal and vacuum concrete. In: International Conference on Engineering and Natural Sciences, 24-28 May, Sarajevo. https://moam.info/isbn-978-605-83575-0-1_59b4ed131723ddd5c6186f97.html
93. 10.1080/19648189.2024.235768210.1080/19648189.2024.2357682 ↗
94. 10.1617/s11527-016-0889-210.1617/s11527-016-0889-2 ↗
95. Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw DMJ, et al. On the development of fly ash-based GP concrete. ACI Mater J. 2004:101:e467–e472.
96. 10.1617/s11527-014-0251-510.1617/s11527-014-0251-5 ↗
97. 10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2016.09.01310.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2016.09.013 ↗
98. 10.47481/jscmt.109331210.47481/jscmt.1093312 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13149610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131496 ↗
100. ASTM C642-13. Standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete. West Conshohocken (PA): ASTM International; 2013.