Towards the classification of recycled concrete aggregates: influence of fundamental aggregate properties on recycled concrete performance
Source abstract
Abstract
This study provides an in-depth evaluation of how fundamental aggregate properties affect mechanical properties of structural concretes produced using 100% coarse Recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) and constant mixture proportions. The key findings presented within this study will assist in developing a framework for classifying RCA sources for use in specific concrete applications. Fourteen mixture proportions were developed using three RCA types with compressive strengths of 30, 40, 50, and 60 MPa. Contrary to other studies, one RCA concrete type had compressive strengths up to 22% greater than the natural aggregate concrete. These results were confirmed by repeated batching and measured to be statistically significant. An analysis of the failure modes of RCA concrete and linking particular aggregate properties to the observed concrete failure mode were used to explain the results. Based on measured correlations, the modulus of elasticity of RCA concrete can be estimated based on the compressive strength and aggregate unit weight.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10022010003410.1007/s100220100034 ↗
2. State of the aggregate resource in Ontario study – consolidated report. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Toronto; 2010.
3. Shayan A · ACI Mater. J · 2002 · 100 · 371
4. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.02010.1016/j.cemconres.2004.09.020 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.03.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.03.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00476-210.1016/S0008-8846(00)00476-2 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.07410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.074 ↗
8. Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) · 2004
9. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2011.06.004 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.04.01210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.04.012 ↗
11. 2009
12. Neville AM · 2011
13. 1990
14. 10.1590/S1516-1439201100500003910.1590/S1516-14392011005000039 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)00938-910.1016/S0008-8846(02)00938-9 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.02.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2007.02.002 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.01910.1016/j.cemconres.2003.12.019 ↗
18. Guide to evaluation of strength test results of concrete, ACI committee 214. ACI 214R-11. ACI committee 214 report. Farmington Hills (MI): American Concrete Institute; 2011.
19. 10.1016/S0008-8846(01)00668-810.1016/S0008-8846(01)00668-8 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00012-910.1016/S0958-9465(01)00012-9 ↗
21. 2002
22. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.03310.1016/j.buildenv.2005.07.033 ↗
23. 2004
24. Pauw A · ACI J · 1960 · 57 · 679