Sustainable mix design of ultra-high performance concrete incorporating recycled brick powder: mechanical, durability, and microstructural effects
Source abstract
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of recycled brick powder (RBP) as a partial binder replacement (10–40%) on the mechanical, durability, and sustainability performance of UHPC under standard and steam curing. Results indicate that increasing RBP reduced flowability but maintained workable consistency with proper superplasticizer dosage. Strength decreased slightly with higher RBP but remained above 100 MPa at 28 days; steam curing enhanced strength by 4–10%. The mixture with 40% RBP and 2% steel fibers (RBP‑40‑2) achieved optimal performance, with 28‑day compressive and flexural strengths of 118.3 MPa and 25.3 MPa, respectively. The chloride diffusion coefficient decreased from 0.799 × 10–12 m2/s (RBP‑0) to 0.377 × 10–12 m2/s (RBP‑40), attributed to pozzolanic hydration and micro‑filling effects. Sustainability assessment showed 37% lower embodied carbon and 38% cost reduction at 40% replacement. Overall, RBP proves to be an effective, eco-efficient binder substitute for UHPC, offering substantial environmental and economic benefits with minimal compromise in mechanical and durability performance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan University of Technology
College of Civil Engineering, Jilin Jianzhu University
College of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/21650373.2018.156439810.1080/21650373.2018.1564398 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.dibe.2023.10018710.1016/j.dibe.2023.100187 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e0184310.1016/j.cscm.2023.e01843 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13752010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137520 ↗
5. 10.3390/buildings1301018510.3390/buildings13010185 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.05110.1016/j.jmrt.2020.12.051 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10424210.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104242 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0139010.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01390 ↗
9. Yang L, Shi C, Wu ZJ. Mitigation techniques for autogenous shrinkage of ultra-high-performance concrete – a review. Cement Concr B: Emerg Mater. 2019;178:456–472.
10. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0055910.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00559 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0419410.1016/j.cscm.2024.e04194 ↗
12. Azmee NM, Shafiq N. Ultra-high-performance concrete: from fundamentals to applications. Case Stud Constr Mater. 2018;9:197–212.
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12943010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129430 ↗
14. 10.3389/fmats.2023.109486410.3389/fmats.2023.1094864 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10779610.1016/j.jobe.2023.107796 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.09510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.095 ↗
17. Du J, Meng W, Khayat KH, et al. New developments of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC). Cem Concr Res. 2021;224:9220–9234.
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13285710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132857 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.26010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.260 ↗
20. 10.1007/s41062-025-02231-310.1007/s41062-025-02231-3 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11762210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117622 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matlet.2025.13967810.1016/j.matlet.2025.139678 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12721310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127213 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10831110.1016/j.jobe.2023.108311 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.01310.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.013 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10834710.1016/j.jobe.2023.108347 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11816310.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118163 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13149310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131493 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.10375810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103758 ↗
30. 10.3390/buildings1210162210.3390/buildings12101622 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13817010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138170 ↗
32. 10.3390/ma1604157010.3390/ma16041570 ↗
33. He Z, Zhu H, Zhang M, et al. Autogenous shrinkage and nano-mechanical properties of UHPC containing waste brick powder derived from construction and demolition waste. Cem Concr Res. 2021;306:869–883.
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13171810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131718 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.02810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.11.028 ↗
36. 10.1063/5.029506110.1063/5.0295061 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14054310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140543 ↗
38. Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Test method for fluidity of cement mortar. GB/T 2419-2005 Standard of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing; 2005.
39. Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic of China. Test method of cement mortar strength (ISO method). GB/T 17671-2021 Standard of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing; 2021.
40. European Committee for Standardization. Testing hardened concrete – part 3: compressive strength of test specimens. EN 12390-3 Brussels; 2009.
41. Chinese Standard. Standard for test methods of long-term performance and durability of ordinary concrete. GB/T 50082 Standard of the People’s Republic of China, Beijing; 2009.
42. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10397410.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.103974 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0132110.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01321 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e4190010.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41900 ↗
45. 10.3390/buildings1411352010.3390/buildings14113520 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13265110.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132651 ↗
47. 10.1007/s12205-022-0035-310.1007/s12205-022-0035-3 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13226810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132268 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.14175510.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141755 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10426310.1016/j.jobe.2022.104263 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13517210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.135172 ↗
52. Shakib S, Sheikh MN, Hadi MNSC. Mitigation of drying shrinkage in alkali-activated reactive powder concrete through copper-coated micro-wire steel fibers. Smart Cement Mater. 2025;1:1–15.
53. 10.1007/s10973-022-11343-210.1007/s10973-022-11343-2 ↗
54. 10.1038/s41598-024-59020-810.1038/s41598-024-59020-8 ↗
55. Ming X, Liu Q, Wang M, et al. Improved chloride binding capacity and corrosion protection of cement-based materials by incorporating alumina nanoparticles. Constr Build Mater. 2023;136:4898–4910.
56. Wang Y, Shui Z, Gao X, et al. Chloride binding capacity and phase modification of alumina-compound blended cement paste under chloride attack. Cem Concr Res. 2020;108:3537–3554.
57. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10647210.1016/j.jobe.2023.106472 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12097610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120976 ↗
59. 10.3390/buildings1411369110.3390/buildings14113691 ↗
60. Sun D, Hu H, Ma R, et al. Preparation and hydration of low-carbon ultra-high-performance concrete with a high fraction of activated tuff and recycled fine powders. Cem Concr Res. 2024;90:9396–9410.
61. 10.1002/xrs.283910.1002/xrs.2839 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.10444910.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104449 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12828810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128288 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.10549710.1016/j.jobe.2022.105497 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.11262310.1016/j.jobe.2025.112623 ↗